Cargando…

A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are frequent after on-pump cardiac surgery. Cardiac surgery results in a complex pulmonary insult leading to high susceptibility to perioperative pulmonary atelectasis. For technical reasons, ventilator settings interact with the surgical proc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lagier, David, Fischer, François, Fornier, William, Fellahi, Jean-Luc, Colson, Pascal, Cholley, Bernard, Jaber, Samir, Baumstarck, Karine, Guidon, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30424770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y
_version_ 1783370718233231360
author Lagier, David
Fischer, François
Fornier, William
Fellahi, Jean-Luc
Colson, Pascal
Cholley, Bernard
Jaber, Samir
Baumstarck, Karine
Guidon, Catherine
author_facet Lagier, David
Fischer, François
Fornier, William
Fellahi, Jean-Luc
Colson, Pascal
Cholley, Bernard
Jaber, Samir
Baumstarck, Karine
Guidon, Catherine
author_sort Lagier, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are frequent after on-pump cardiac surgery. Cardiac surgery results in a complex pulmonary insult leading to high susceptibility to perioperative pulmonary atelectasis. For technical reasons, ventilator settings interact with the surgical procedure and traditionally, low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been used. The objective is to compare a perioperative, multimodal and surgeon-controlled open-lung approach with conventional protective ventilation with low PEEP to prevent PPCs in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: The perioperative open-lung protective ventilation in cardiac surgery (PROVECS) trial is a multicenter, two-arm, randomized controlled trial. In total, 494 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp will be randomized into one of the two treatment arms. In the experimental group, systematic recruitment maneuvers and perioperative high PEEP (8 cmH2O) are associated with ultra-protective ventilation during CPB. In this group, the settings of the ventilator are controlled by surgeons in relation to standardized protocol deviations. In the control group, no recruitment maneuvers, low levels of PEEP (2 cmH2O) and continuous positive airway pressure during CPB (2 cmH2O) are used. Low tidal volumes (6–8 mL/kg of predicted body weight) are used before and after CPB in each group. The primary endpoint is a composite of the single PPCs evaluated during the first 7 postoperative days. DISCUSSION: The PROVECS trial will be the first multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a perioperative and multimodal open-lung ventilatory strategy on the occurrence of PPCs after on-pump cardiac surgery. The trial design includes standardized surgeon-controlled protocol deviations that guarantee a pragmatic approach. The results will help anesthesiologists and surgeons aiming to optimize ventilatory settings during cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT 02866578. Registered on 15 August 2016. Last updated 11 July 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6234562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62345622018-11-23 A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Lagier, David Fischer, François Fornier, William Fellahi, Jean-Luc Colson, Pascal Cholley, Bernard Jaber, Samir Baumstarck, Karine Guidon, Catherine Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are frequent after on-pump cardiac surgery. Cardiac surgery results in a complex pulmonary insult leading to high susceptibility to perioperative pulmonary atelectasis. For technical reasons, ventilator settings interact with the surgical procedure and traditionally, low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been used. The objective is to compare a perioperative, multimodal and surgeon-controlled open-lung approach with conventional protective ventilation with low PEEP to prevent PPCs in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: The perioperative open-lung protective ventilation in cardiac surgery (PROVECS) trial is a multicenter, two-arm, randomized controlled trial. In total, 494 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp will be randomized into one of the two treatment arms. In the experimental group, systematic recruitment maneuvers and perioperative high PEEP (8 cmH2O) are associated with ultra-protective ventilation during CPB. In this group, the settings of the ventilator are controlled by surgeons in relation to standardized protocol deviations. In the control group, no recruitment maneuvers, low levels of PEEP (2 cmH2O) and continuous positive airway pressure during CPB (2 cmH2O) are used. Low tidal volumes (6–8 mL/kg of predicted body weight) are used before and after CPB in each group. The primary endpoint is a composite of the single PPCs evaluated during the first 7 postoperative days. DISCUSSION: The PROVECS trial will be the first multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a perioperative and multimodal open-lung ventilatory strategy on the occurrence of PPCs after on-pump cardiac surgery. The trial design includes standardized surgeon-controlled protocol deviations that guarantee a pragmatic approach. The results will help anesthesiologists and surgeons aiming to optimize ventilatory settings during cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT 02866578. Registered on 15 August 2016. Last updated 11 July 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6234562/ /pubmed/30424770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lagier, David
Fischer, François
Fornier, William
Fellahi, Jean-Luc
Colson, Pascal
Cholley, Bernard
Jaber, Samir
Baumstarck, Karine
Guidon, Catherine
A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (provecs): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30424770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lagierdavid aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fischerfrancois aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fornierwilliam aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fellahijeanluc aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT colsonpascal aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cholleybernard aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jabersamir aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baumstarckkarine aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guidoncatherine aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lagierdavid perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fischerfrancois perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fornierwilliam perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fellahijeanluc perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT colsonpascal perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cholleybernard perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jabersamir perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baumstarckkarine perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guidoncatherine perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial