Cargando…
A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are frequent after on-pump cardiac surgery. Cardiac surgery results in a complex pulmonary insult leading to high susceptibility to perioperative pulmonary atelectasis. For technical reasons, ventilator settings interact with the surgical proc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30424770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y |
_version_ | 1783370718233231360 |
---|---|
author | Lagier, David Fischer, François Fornier, William Fellahi, Jean-Luc Colson, Pascal Cholley, Bernard Jaber, Samir Baumstarck, Karine Guidon, Catherine |
author_facet | Lagier, David Fischer, François Fornier, William Fellahi, Jean-Luc Colson, Pascal Cholley, Bernard Jaber, Samir Baumstarck, Karine Guidon, Catherine |
author_sort | Lagier, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are frequent after on-pump cardiac surgery. Cardiac surgery results in a complex pulmonary insult leading to high susceptibility to perioperative pulmonary atelectasis. For technical reasons, ventilator settings interact with the surgical procedure and traditionally, low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been used. The objective is to compare a perioperative, multimodal and surgeon-controlled open-lung approach with conventional protective ventilation with low PEEP to prevent PPCs in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: The perioperative open-lung protective ventilation in cardiac surgery (PROVECS) trial is a multicenter, two-arm, randomized controlled trial. In total, 494 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp will be randomized into one of the two treatment arms. In the experimental group, systematic recruitment maneuvers and perioperative high PEEP (8 cmH2O) are associated with ultra-protective ventilation during CPB. In this group, the settings of the ventilator are controlled by surgeons in relation to standardized protocol deviations. In the control group, no recruitment maneuvers, low levels of PEEP (2 cmH2O) and continuous positive airway pressure during CPB (2 cmH2O) are used. Low tidal volumes (6–8 mL/kg of predicted body weight) are used before and after CPB in each group. The primary endpoint is a composite of the single PPCs evaluated during the first 7 postoperative days. DISCUSSION: The PROVECS trial will be the first multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a perioperative and multimodal open-lung ventilatory strategy on the occurrence of PPCs after on-pump cardiac surgery. The trial design includes standardized surgeon-controlled protocol deviations that guarantee a pragmatic approach. The results will help anesthesiologists and surgeons aiming to optimize ventilatory settings during cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT 02866578. Registered on 15 August 2016. Last updated 11 July 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6234562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62345622018-11-23 A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Lagier, David Fischer, François Fornier, William Fellahi, Jean-Luc Colson, Pascal Cholley, Bernard Jaber, Samir Baumstarck, Karine Guidon, Catherine Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are frequent after on-pump cardiac surgery. Cardiac surgery results in a complex pulmonary insult leading to high susceptibility to perioperative pulmonary atelectasis. For technical reasons, ventilator settings interact with the surgical procedure and traditionally, low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been used. The objective is to compare a perioperative, multimodal and surgeon-controlled open-lung approach with conventional protective ventilation with low PEEP to prevent PPCs in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: The perioperative open-lung protective ventilation in cardiac surgery (PROVECS) trial is a multicenter, two-arm, randomized controlled trial. In total, 494 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp will be randomized into one of the two treatment arms. In the experimental group, systematic recruitment maneuvers and perioperative high PEEP (8 cmH2O) are associated with ultra-protective ventilation during CPB. In this group, the settings of the ventilator are controlled by surgeons in relation to standardized protocol deviations. In the control group, no recruitment maneuvers, low levels of PEEP (2 cmH2O) and continuous positive airway pressure during CPB (2 cmH2O) are used. Low tidal volumes (6–8 mL/kg of predicted body weight) are used before and after CPB in each group. The primary endpoint is a composite of the single PPCs evaluated during the first 7 postoperative days. DISCUSSION: The PROVECS trial will be the first multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a perioperative and multimodal open-lung ventilatory strategy on the occurrence of PPCs after on-pump cardiac surgery. The trial design includes standardized surgeon-controlled protocol deviations that guarantee a pragmatic approach. The results will help anesthesiologists and surgeons aiming to optimize ventilatory settings during cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT 02866578. Registered on 15 August 2016. Last updated 11 July 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6234562/ /pubmed/30424770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lagier, David Fischer, François Fornier, William Fellahi, Jean-Luc Colson, Pascal Cholley, Bernard Jaber, Samir Baumstarck, Karine Guidon, Catherine A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | A perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (PROVECS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | perioperative surgeon-controlled open-lung approach versus conventional protective ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (provecs): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30424770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2967-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lagierdavid aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fischerfrancois aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fornierwilliam aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fellahijeanluc aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT colsonpascal aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cholleybernard aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jabersamir aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baumstarckkarine aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT guidoncatherine aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aperioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lagierdavid perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fischerfrancois perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fornierwilliam perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fellahijeanluc perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT colsonpascal perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cholleybernard perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jabersamir perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baumstarckkarine perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT guidoncatherine perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT perioperativesurgeoncontrolledopenlungapproachversusconventionalprotectiveventilationwithlowpositiveendexpiratorypressureincardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassprovecsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |