Cargando…

Conventional and complementary cancer treatments: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities?

BACKGROUND: Both conventional health care providers and complementary therapists treat cancer patients. To provide effective treatment, both types of providers should to be familiar with their own as well as alternative types of treatment. Our aim was to compare how conventional health care provider...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stub, Trine, Quandt, Sara A., Arcury, Thomas A., Sandberg, Joanne C., Kristoffersen, Agnete E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30428878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3674-9
_version_ 1783370723306242048
author Stub, Trine
Quandt, Sara A.
Arcury, Thomas A.
Sandberg, Joanne C.
Kristoffersen, Agnete E.
author_facet Stub, Trine
Quandt, Sara A.
Arcury, Thomas A.
Sandberg, Joanne C.
Kristoffersen, Agnete E.
author_sort Stub, Trine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both conventional health care providers and complementary therapists treat cancer patients. To provide effective treatment, both types of providers should to be familiar with their own as well as alternative types of treatment. Our aim was to compare how conventional health care providers (oncology doctors, oncology nurses, family physicians) and complementary therapists (acupuncturists, reflexologists, massage therapists) seek information about conventional and complementary cancer treatments. METHOD: This analysis was conducted on the basis of feedback from 466 participants. We used self-administered questionnaires in a cross-sectional study. RESULTS: The majority of the medical doctors (96%) searched for evidence-based information regarding conventional cancer treatments. They gathered this information mostly from guidelines, which is considered best practice and is expected from Norwegian health personnel. Eighty-one percent of the nurses gather this information from evidence based resources such as UpToDate. Colleagues were asked for information by 58% of the medical doctors and 64% of the nurses. Moreover, 50% of the medical doctors and 57% of the nurses searched for evidence-based information about complementary cancer modalities. The acupuncturists gathered evidence-based information for both conventional (79%) and complementary (77%) modalities, followed by the reflexologists (54 and 54%, respectively) and massage therapists (54 and 52%, respectively). Nearly half of the acupuncturist (49%) asked a colleague for information. CONCLUSION: To provide safe cancer care, it is important that advice about complementary modalities is based on current and evidence-based evaluations. The majority of the medical doctors and nurses in this study sought information according to evidence-based medicine regarding conventional cancer treatments, and about half of them gathered evidence-based information about complementary cancer modalities. This was also true for the complementary therapists as they gathered information about complementary and conventional treatments from evidence-based evaluations. This demonstrates that since the term evidence-based medicine was first introduced in 1991, the approach has grown extensively and both conventional and complementary providers use this approach to seek information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6234581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62345812018-11-23 Conventional and complementary cancer treatments: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities? Stub, Trine Quandt, Sara A. Arcury, Thomas A. Sandberg, Joanne C. Kristoffersen, Agnete E. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Both conventional health care providers and complementary therapists treat cancer patients. To provide effective treatment, both types of providers should to be familiar with their own as well as alternative types of treatment. Our aim was to compare how conventional health care providers (oncology doctors, oncology nurses, family physicians) and complementary therapists (acupuncturists, reflexologists, massage therapists) seek information about conventional and complementary cancer treatments. METHOD: This analysis was conducted on the basis of feedback from 466 participants. We used self-administered questionnaires in a cross-sectional study. RESULTS: The majority of the medical doctors (96%) searched for evidence-based information regarding conventional cancer treatments. They gathered this information mostly from guidelines, which is considered best practice and is expected from Norwegian health personnel. Eighty-one percent of the nurses gather this information from evidence based resources such as UpToDate. Colleagues were asked for information by 58% of the medical doctors and 64% of the nurses. Moreover, 50% of the medical doctors and 57% of the nurses searched for evidence-based information about complementary cancer modalities. The acupuncturists gathered evidence-based information for both conventional (79%) and complementary (77%) modalities, followed by the reflexologists (54 and 54%, respectively) and massage therapists (54 and 52%, respectively). Nearly half of the acupuncturist (49%) asked a colleague for information. CONCLUSION: To provide safe cancer care, it is important that advice about complementary modalities is based on current and evidence-based evaluations. The majority of the medical doctors and nurses in this study sought information according to evidence-based medicine regarding conventional cancer treatments, and about half of them gathered evidence-based information about complementary cancer modalities. This was also true for the complementary therapists as they gathered information about complementary and conventional treatments from evidence-based evaluations. This demonstrates that since the term evidence-based medicine was first introduced in 1991, the approach has grown extensively and both conventional and complementary providers use this approach to seek information. BioMed Central 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6234581/ /pubmed/30428878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3674-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stub, Trine
Quandt, Sara A.
Arcury, Thomas A.
Sandberg, Joanne C.
Kristoffersen, Agnete E.
Conventional and complementary cancer treatments: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities?
title Conventional and complementary cancer treatments: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities?
title_full Conventional and complementary cancer treatments: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities?
title_fullStr Conventional and complementary cancer treatments: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities?
title_full_unstemmed Conventional and complementary cancer treatments: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities?
title_short Conventional and complementary cancer treatments: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities?
title_sort conventional and complementary cancer treatments: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30428878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3674-9
work_keys_str_mv AT stubtrine conventionalandcomplementarycancertreatmentswheredoconventionalandcomplementaryprovidersseekinformationaboutthesemodalities
AT quandtsaraa conventionalandcomplementarycancertreatmentswheredoconventionalandcomplementaryprovidersseekinformationaboutthesemodalities
AT arcurythomasa conventionalandcomplementarycancertreatmentswheredoconventionalandcomplementaryprovidersseekinformationaboutthesemodalities
AT sandbergjoannec conventionalandcomplementarycancertreatmentswheredoconventionalandcomplementaryprovidersseekinformationaboutthesemodalities
AT kristoffersenagnetee conventionalandcomplementarycancertreatmentswheredoconventionalandcomplementaryprovidersseekinformationaboutthesemodalities