Cargando…

Systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is a common problem in the general population and is responsible for prolonged periods of disability, loss of productivity, absence from work and inability to carry out household activities. Rotator cuff problems account for up to 70% of shoulder pain problems and are the t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenall, Gemma, Carr, Andrew, Beard, David, Rees, Jonathan, Rangan, Amar, Merritt, Naomi, Dritsaki, Melina, Nagra, Navraj S., Baldwin, Mathew, Hopewell, Sally, Cook, Jonathan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30424809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0851-1
_version_ 1783370743008985088
author Greenall, Gemma
Carr, Andrew
Beard, David
Rees, Jonathan
Rangan, Amar
Merritt, Naomi
Dritsaki, Melina
Nagra, Navraj S.
Baldwin, Mathew
Hopewell, Sally
Cook, Jonathan A.
author_facet Greenall, Gemma
Carr, Andrew
Beard, David
Rees, Jonathan
Rangan, Amar
Merritt, Naomi
Dritsaki, Melina
Nagra, Navraj S.
Baldwin, Mathew
Hopewell, Sally
Cook, Jonathan A.
author_sort Greenall, Gemma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is a common problem in the general population and is responsible for prolonged periods of disability, loss of productivity, absence from work and inability to carry out household activities. Rotator cuff problems account for up to 70% of shoulder pain problems and are the third most prevalent musculoskeletal disorder after those occurring in the lower back and neck. Rotator cuff surgery has high failure rates (25–50% within 12 months), and as a result, there is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff surgery. Patch augmented surgery for rotator cuff repairs has recently been developed and is increasingly being used within the UK National Health Service. Patch augmented surgery could lead to a dramatic improvement in patient and surgical outcomes, but its clinical and cost effectiveness needs rigorous evaluation. The existing evidence on the use of patches may be at risk of bias as currently only a small number of single-centre comparative studies appear to have been carried out. Additionally, it is unclear for which patches a clinical study (comparative and non-comparative) has been conducted. This paper outlines the protocol for a systematic review intended to summarise the best available clinical evidence and will indicate what further research is required. METHODS: Electronic databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) will be systematically searched between April 2006 and the present day for relevant publications using a specified search strategy, which can be adapted for the use in multiple electronic databases, and inclusion criteria. Screening of both titles and abstracts will be done by two independent reviewers with any discrepancies resolved by a third independent reviewer. Data extraction will include information regarding the type of participants, type of intervention and outcomes including but not limited to shoulder-specific function and pain scores, patch-related adverse events and type of study. The results will be summarised in a narrative review where qualitative analysis is not possible. DISCUSSION: This review aims to collate the current evidence base regarding the use of patches to augment rotator cuff repair. The results of this review will help to develop, using consensus methods, the design of a definitive randomised trial assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a patch to augment surgical repair of the rotator cuff that is both acceptable to stakeholders and is feasible. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42017057908 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0851-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6234662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62346622018-11-23 Systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol Greenall, Gemma Carr, Andrew Beard, David Rees, Jonathan Rangan, Amar Merritt, Naomi Dritsaki, Melina Nagra, Navraj S. Baldwin, Mathew Hopewell, Sally Cook, Jonathan A. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is a common problem in the general population and is responsible for prolonged periods of disability, loss of productivity, absence from work and inability to carry out household activities. Rotator cuff problems account for up to 70% of shoulder pain problems and are the third most prevalent musculoskeletal disorder after those occurring in the lower back and neck. Rotator cuff surgery has high failure rates (25–50% within 12 months), and as a result, there is a pressing need to improve the outcome of rotator cuff surgery. Patch augmented surgery for rotator cuff repairs has recently been developed and is increasingly being used within the UK National Health Service. Patch augmented surgery could lead to a dramatic improvement in patient and surgical outcomes, but its clinical and cost effectiveness needs rigorous evaluation. The existing evidence on the use of patches may be at risk of bias as currently only a small number of single-centre comparative studies appear to have been carried out. Additionally, it is unclear for which patches a clinical study (comparative and non-comparative) has been conducted. This paper outlines the protocol for a systematic review intended to summarise the best available clinical evidence and will indicate what further research is required. METHODS: Electronic databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) will be systematically searched between April 2006 and the present day for relevant publications using a specified search strategy, which can be adapted for the use in multiple electronic databases, and inclusion criteria. Screening of both titles and abstracts will be done by two independent reviewers with any discrepancies resolved by a third independent reviewer. Data extraction will include information regarding the type of participants, type of intervention and outcomes including but not limited to shoulder-specific function and pain scores, patch-related adverse events and type of study. The results will be summarised in a narrative review where qualitative analysis is not possible. DISCUSSION: This review aims to collate the current evidence base regarding the use of patches to augment rotator cuff repair. The results of this review will help to develop, using consensus methods, the design of a definitive randomised trial assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a patch to augment surgical repair of the rotator cuff that is both acceptable to stakeholders and is feasible. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42017057908 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0851-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6234662/ /pubmed/30424809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0851-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Greenall, Gemma
Carr, Andrew
Beard, David
Rees, Jonathan
Rangan, Amar
Merritt, Naomi
Dritsaki, Melina
Nagra, Navraj S.
Baldwin, Mathew
Hopewell, Sally
Cook, Jonathan A.
Systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol
title Systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol
title_full Systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol
title_fullStr Systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol
title_short Systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol
title_sort systematic review of the surgical management of rotator cuff repair with an augmentative patch: a feasibility study protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30424809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0851-1
work_keys_str_mv AT greenallgemma systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT carrandrew systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT bearddavid systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT reesjonathan systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT ranganamar systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT merrittnaomi systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT dritsakimelina systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT nagranavrajs systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT baldwinmathew systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT hopewellsally systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT cookjonathana systematicreviewofthesurgicalmanagementofrotatorcuffrepairwithanaugmentativepatchafeasibilitystudyprotocol