Cargando…
Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
BACKGROUND: The seeding of scaffolds with the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue is a common prevascularization strategy in tissue engineering. Alternatively, adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (ad-MVF) may serve as vascularization units. In contrast to SVF single cells, t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3 |
_version_ | 1783370745109282816 |
---|---|
author | Später, Thomas Frueh, Florian S. Nickels, Ruth M. Menger, Michael D. Laschke, Matthias W. |
author_facet | Später, Thomas Frueh, Florian S. Nickels, Ruth M. Menger, Michael D. Laschke, Matthias W. |
author_sort | Später, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The seeding of scaffolds with the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue is a common prevascularization strategy in tissue engineering. Alternatively, adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (ad-MVF) may serve as vascularization units. In contrast to SVF single cells, they represent a mixture of intact arteriolar, capillary and venular vessel segments. Therefore, we herein hypothesized that the ad-MVF-based prevascularization of scaffolds is superior to the conventional SVF single cells-based approach. RESULTS: SVF single cells and ad-MVF were enzymatically isolated from epididymal fat pads of green fluorescent protein (GFP)(+) donor mice to assess their viability and cellular composition using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Moreover, collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices (Integra®) were seeded with identical amounts of the isolates and implanted into full-thickness skin defects within dorsal skinfold chambers of GFP(−) recipient mice for the intravital fluorescent microscopic, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of implant vascularization and incorporation throughout an observation period of 2 weeks. Non-seeded matrices served as controls. While both isolates contained a comparable fraction of endothelial cells, perivascular cells, adipocytes and stem cells, ad-MVF exhibited a significantly higher viability. After in vivo implantation, the vascularization of ad-MVF-seeded scaffolds was improved when compared to SVF-seeded ones, as indicated by a significantly higher functional microvessel density. This was associated with an enhanced cellular infiltration, collagen content and density of CD31(+)/GFP(+) microvessels particularly in the center of the implants, demonstrating a better incorporation into the surrounding host tissue. In contrast, non-seeded matrices exhibited a poor vascularization, incorporation and epithelialization over time. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that ad-MVF are highly potent vascularization units that markedly accelerate and improve scaffold vascularization when compared to the SVF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6234670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62346702018-11-23 Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments Später, Thomas Frueh, Florian S. Nickels, Ruth M. Menger, Michael D. Laschke, Matthias W. J Biol Eng Research BACKGROUND: The seeding of scaffolds with the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue is a common prevascularization strategy in tissue engineering. Alternatively, adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (ad-MVF) may serve as vascularization units. In contrast to SVF single cells, they represent a mixture of intact arteriolar, capillary and venular vessel segments. Therefore, we herein hypothesized that the ad-MVF-based prevascularization of scaffolds is superior to the conventional SVF single cells-based approach. RESULTS: SVF single cells and ad-MVF were enzymatically isolated from epididymal fat pads of green fluorescent protein (GFP)(+) donor mice to assess their viability and cellular composition using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Moreover, collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices (Integra®) were seeded with identical amounts of the isolates and implanted into full-thickness skin defects within dorsal skinfold chambers of GFP(−) recipient mice for the intravital fluorescent microscopic, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of implant vascularization and incorporation throughout an observation period of 2 weeks. Non-seeded matrices served as controls. While both isolates contained a comparable fraction of endothelial cells, perivascular cells, adipocytes and stem cells, ad-MVF exhibited a significantly higher viability. After in vivo implantation, the vascularization of ad-MVF-seeded scaffolds was improved when compared to SVF-seeded ones, as indicated by a significantly higher functional microvessel density. This was associated with an enhanced cellular infiltration, collagen content and density of CD31(+)/GFP(+) microvessels particularly in the center of the implants, demonstrating a better incorporation into the surrounding host tissue. In contrast, non-seeded matrices exhibited a poor vascularization, incorporation and epithelialization over time. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that ad-MVF are highly potent vascularization units that markedly accelerate and improve scaffold vascularization when compared to the SVF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6234670/ /pubmed/30473729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Später, Thomas Frueh, Florian S. Nickels, Ruth M. Menger, Michael D. Laschke, Matthias W. Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments |
title | Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments |
title_full | Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments |
title_fullStr | Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments |
title_short | Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments |
title_sort | prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spaterthomas prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments AT fruehflorians prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments AT nickelsruthm prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments AT mengermichaeld prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments AT laschkematthiasw prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments |