Cargando…

Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments

BACKGROUND: The seeding of scaffolds with the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue is a common prevascularization strategy in tissue engineering. Alternatively, adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (ad-MVF) may serve as vascularization units. In contrast to SVF single cells, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Später, Thomas, Frueh, Florian S., Nickels, Ruth M., Menger, Michael D., Laschke, Matthias W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3
_version_ 1783370745109282816
author Später, Thomas
Frueh, Florian S.
Nickels, Ruth M.
Menger, Michael D.
Laschke, Matthias W.
author_facet Später, Thomas
Frueh, Florian S.
Nickels, Ruth M.
Menger, Michael D.
Laschke, Matthias W.
author_sort Später, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The seeding of scaffolds with the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue is a common prevascularization strategy in tissue engineering. Alternatively, adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (ad-MVF) may serve as vascularization units. In contrast to SVF single cells, they represent a mixture of intact arteriolar, capillary and venular vessel segments. Therefore, we herein hypothesized that the ad-MVF-based prevascularization of scaffolds is superior to the conventional SVF single cells-based approach. RESULTS: SVF single cells and ad-MVF were enzymatically isolated from epididymal fat pads of green fluorescent protein (GFP)(+) donor mice to assess their viability and cellular composition using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Moreover, collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices (Integra®) were seeded with identical amounts of the isolates and implanted into full-thickness skin defects within dorsal skinfold chambers of GFP(−) recipient mice for the intravital fluorescent microscopic, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of implant vascularization and incorporation throughout an observation period of 2 weeks. Non-seeded matrices served as controls. While both isolates contained a comparable fraction of endothelial cells, perivascular cells, adipocytes and stem cells, ad-MVF exhibited a significantly higher viability. After in vivo implantation, the vascularization of ad-MVF-seeded scaffolds was improved when compared to SVF-seeded ones, as indicated by a significantly higher functional microvessel density. This was associated with an enhanced cellular infiltration, collagen content and density of CD31(+)/GFP(+) microvessels particularly in the center of the implants, demonstrating a better incorporation into the surrounding host tissue. In contrast, non-seeded matrices exhibited a poor vascularization, incorporation and epithelialization over time. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that ad-MVF are highly potent vascularization units that markedly accelerate and improve scaffold vascularization when compared to the SVF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6234670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62346702018-11-23 Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments Später, Thomas Frueh, Florian S. Nickels, Ruth M. Menger, Michael D. Laschke, Matthias W. J Biol Eng Research BACKGROUND: The seeding of scaffolds with the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue is a common prevascularization strategy in tissue engineering. Alternatively, adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (ad-MVF) may serve as vascularization units. In contrast to SVF single cells, they represent a mixture of intact arteriolar, capillary and venular vessel segments. Therefore, we herein hypothesized that the ad-MVF-based prevascularization of scaffolds is superior to the conventional SVF single cells-based approach. RESULTS: SVF single cells and ad-MVF were enzymatically isolated from epididymal fat pads of green fluorescent protein (GFP)(+) donor mice to assess their viability and cellular composition using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Moreover, collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices (Integra®) were seeded with identical amounts of the isolates and implanted into full-thickness skin defects within dorsal skinfold chambers of GFP(−) recipient mice for the intravital fluorescent microscopic, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of implant vascularization and incorporation throughout an observation period of 2 weeks. Non-seeded matrices served as controls. While both isolates contained a comparable fraction of endothelial cells, perivascular cells, adipocytes and stem cells, ad-MVF exhibited a significantly higher viability. After in vivo implantation, the vascularization of ad-MVF-seeded scaffolds was improved when compared to SVF-seeded ones, as indicated by a significantly higher functional microvessel density. This was associated with an enhanced cellular infiltration, collagen content and density of CD31(+)/GFP(+) microvessels particularly in the center of the implants, demonstrating a better incorporation into the surrounding host tissue. In contrast, non-seeded matrices exhibited a poor vascularization, incorporation and epithelialization over time. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that ad-MVF are highly potent vascularization units that markedly accelerate and improve scaffold vascularization when compared to the SVF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6234670/ /pubmed/30473729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Später, Thomas
Frueh, Florian S.
Nickels, Ruth M.
Menger, Michael D.
Laschke, Matthias W.
Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title_full Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title_fullStr Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title_full_unstemmed Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title_short Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title_sort prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3
work_keys_str_mv AT spaterthomas prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments
AT fruehflorians prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments
AT nickelsruthm prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments
AT mengermichaeld prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments
AT laschkematthiasw prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments