Cargando…

Development and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among French general practitioners

BACKGROUND: There is currently an absence of valid and relevant instruments to evaluate how Evidence-based Practice (EBP) training improves, beyond knowledge, physicians’ skills. Our aim was to develop and test a tool to assess physicians’ EBP skills. METHODS: The tool we developed includes four par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rousselot, Nicolas, Tombrey, Thomas, Zongo, Drissa, Mouillet, Evelyne, Joseph, Jean-Philippe, Gay, Bernard, Salmi, Louis Rachid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1368-y
_version_ 1783370778634354688
author Rousselot, Nicolas
Tombrey, Thomas
Zongo, Drissa
Mouillet, Evelyne
Joseph, Jean-Philippe
Gay, Bernard
Salmi, Louis Rachid
author_facet Rousselot, Nicolas
Tombrey, Thomas
Zongo, Drissa
Mouillet, Evelyne
Joseph, Jean-Philippe
Gay, Bernard
Salmi, Louis Rachid
author_sort Rousselot, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is currently an absence of valid and relevant instruments to evaluate how Evidence-based Practice (EBP) training improves, beyond knowledge, physicians’ skills. Our aim was to develop and test a tool to assess physicians’ EBP skills. METHODS: The tool we developed includes four parts to assess the necessary skills for applying EBP steps: clinical question formulation; literature search; critical appraisal of literature; synthesis and decision making. We evaluated content and face validity, then tested applicability of the tool and whether external observers could reliably use it to assess acquired skills. We estimated Kappa coefficients to measure concordance between raters. RESULTS: Twelve general practice (GP) residents and eleven GP teachers from the University of Bordeaux, France, were asked to: formulate four clinical questions (diagnostic, prognosis, treatment, and aetiology) from a proposed clinical vignette, find articles or guidelines to answer four relevant provided questions, analyse an original article answering one of these questions, synthesize knowledge from provided synopses, and decide about the four clinical questions. Concordance between two external raters was excellent for their assessment of participants’ appraisal of the significance of article results (K = 0.83), and good for assessment of the formulation of a diagnostic question (K = 0.76), PubMed/Medline (K = 0.71) or guideline (K = 0.67) search, and of appraisal of methodological validity of articles (K = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Our tool allows an in-depth analysis of EBP skills, thus could supplement existing instruments focused on knowledge or specific EBP step. The actual usefulness of such tools to improve care and population health remains to be evaluated. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1368-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6234795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62347952018-11-20 Development and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among French general practitioners Rousselot, Nicolas Tombrey, Thomas Zongo, Drissa Mouillet, Evelyne Joseph, Jean-Philippe Gay, Bernard Salmi, Louis Rachid BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: There is currently an absence of valid and relevant instruments to evaluate how Evidence-based Practice (EBP) training improves, beyond knowledge, physicians’ skills. Our aim was to develop and test a tool to assess physicians’ EBP skills. METHODS: The tool we developed includes four parts to assess the necessary skills for applying EBP steps: clinical question formulation; literature search; critical appraisal of literature; synthesis and decision making. We evaluated content and face validity, then tested applicability of the tool and whether external observers could reliably use it to assess acquired skills. We estimated Kappa coefficients to measure concordance between raters. RESULTS: Twelve general practice (GP) residents and eleven GP teachers from the University of Bordeaux, France, were asked to: formulate four clinical questions (diagnostic, prognosis, treatment, and aetiology) from a proposed clinical vignette, find articles or guidelines to answer four relevant provided questions, analyse an original article answering one of these questions, synthesize knowledge from provided synopses, and decide about the four clinical questions. Concordance between two external raters was excellent for their assessment of participants’ appraisal of the significance of article results (K = 0.83), and good for assessment of the formulation of a diagnostic question (K = 0.76), PubMed/Medline (K = 0.71) or guideline (K = 0.67) search, and of appraisal of methodological validity of articles (K = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Our tool allows an in-depth analysis of EBP skills, thus could supplement existing instruments focused on knowledge or specific EBP step. The actual usefulness of such tools to improve care and population health remains to be evaluated. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1368-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6234795/ /pubmed/30413196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1368-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rousselot, Nicolas
Tombrey, Thomas
Zongo, Drissa
Mouillet, Evelyne
Joseph, Jean-Philippe
Gay, Bernard
Salmi, Louis Rachid
Development and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among French general practitioners
title Development and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among French general practitioners
title_full Development and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among French general practitioners
title_fullStr Development and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among French general practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Development and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among French general practitioners
title_short Development and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among French general practitioners
title_sort development and pilot testing of a tool to assess evidence-based practice skills among french general practitioners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1368-y
work_keys_str_mv AT rousselotnicolas developmentandpilottestingofatooltoassessevidencebasedpracticeskillsamongfrenchgeneralpractitioners
AT tombreythomas developmentandpilottestingofatooltoassessevidencebasedpracticeskillsamongfrenchgeneralpractitioners
AT zongodrissa developmentandpilottestingofatooltoassessevidencebasedpracticeskillsamongfrenchgeneralpractitioners
AT mouilletevelyne developmentandpilottestingofatooltoassessevidencebasedpracticeskillsamongfrenchgeneralpractitioners
AT josephjeanphilippe developmentandpilottestingofatooltoassessevidencebasedpracticeskillsamongfrenchgeneralpractitioners
AT gaybernard developmentandpilottestingofatooltoassessevidencebasedpracticeskillsamongfrenchgeneralpractitioners
AT salmilouisrachid developmentandpilottestingofatooltoassessevidencebasedpracticeskillsamongfrenchgeneralpractitioners