Cargando…

Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry

AIMS: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline on high blood pressure (BP) lowered the threshold defining hypertension and BP target in high-risk patients to 130/80 mmHg. Patients with coronary artery disease and systolic BP 130–139 mmHg or diastolic BP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle, Sorbets, Emmanuel, Bhatt, Deepak L, Ducrocq, Gregory, Elbez, Yedid, Ferrari, Roberto, Ford, Ian, Tardif, Jean-Claude, Tendera, Michal, Fox, Kim M, Steg, Philippe Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30124796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy488
_version_ 1783370789480824832
author Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle
Sorbets, Emmanuel
Bhatt, Deepak L
Ducrocq, Gregory
Elbez, Yedid
Ferrari, Roberto
Ford, Ian
Tardif, Jean-Claude
Tendera, Michal
Fox, Kim M
Steg, Philippe Gabriel
author_facet Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle
Sorbets, Emmanuel
Bhatt, Deepak L
Ducrocq, Gregory
Elbez, Yedid
Ferrari, Roberto
Ford, Ian
Tardif, Jean-Claude
Tendera, Michal
Fox, Kim M
Steg, Philippe Gabriel
author_sort Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline on high blood pressure (BP) lowered the threshold defining hypertension and BP target in high-risk patients to 130/80 mmHg. Patients with coronary artery disease and systolic BP 130–139 mmHg or diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg should now receive medication to achieve this target. We aimed to investigate the relationship between BP and cardiovascular events in ‘real-life’ patients with coronary artery disease considered as having normal BP until the recent guideline. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 5956 patients with stable coronary artery disease, no history of hypertension or heart failure, and average BP <140/90 mmHg, enrolled in the CLARIFY registry (November 2009 to June 2010), were analysed. In a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, after a median follow-up of 5.0 years, diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg, but not systolic BP 130–139 mmHg, was associated with increased risk of the primary endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.22–3.81 vs. 70–79 mmHg and 1.12, 0.64–1.97 vs. 120–129 mmHg). No significant increase in risk for the primary endpoint was observed for systolic BP <120 mmHg or diastolic BP <70 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In patients with stable coronary artery disease defined as having normal BP according to the 140/90 mmHg threshold, diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg was associated with increased cardiovascular risk, whereas systolic BP 130–139 mmHg was not, supporting the lower diastolic but not the lower systolic BP hypertension-defining threshold and treatment target in coronary artery disease. CLINICALTRIALS IDENTIFIER: ISRCTN43070564.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6234847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62348472018-11-19 Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle Sorbets, Emmanuel Bhatt, Deepak L Ducrocq, Gregory Elbez, Yedid Ferrari, Roberto Ford, Ian Tardif, Jean-Claude Tendera, Michal Fox, Kim M Steg, Philippe Gabriel Eur Heart J Fast Track Clinical Research AIMS: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline on high blood pressure (BP) lowered the threshold defining hypertension and BP target in high-risk patients to 130/80 mmHg. Patients with coronary artery disease and systolic BP 130–139 mmHg or diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg should now receive medication to achieve this target. We aimed to investigate the relationship between BP and cardiovascular events in ‘real-life’ patients with coronary artery disease considered as having normal BP until the recent guideline. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 5956 patients with stable coronary artery disease, no history of hypertension or heart failure, and average BP <140/90 mmHg, enrolled in the CLARIFY registry (November 2009 to June 2010), were analysed. In a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, after a median follow-up of 5.0 years, diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg, but not systolic BP 130–139 mmHg, was associated with increased risk of the primary endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.22–3.81 vs. 70–79 mmHg and 1.12, 0.64–1.97 vs. 120–129 mmHg). No significant increase in risk for the primary endpoint was observed for systolic BP <120 mmHg or diastolic BP <70 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In patients with stable coronary artery disease defined as having normal BP according to the 140/90 mmHg threshold, diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg was associated with increased cardiovascular risk, whereas systolic BP 130–139 mmHg was not, supporting the lower diastolic but not the lower systolic BP hypertension-defining threshold and treatment target in coronary artery disease. CLINICALTRIALS IDENTIFIER: ISRCTN43070564. Oxford University Press 2018-11-14 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6234847/ /pubmed/30124796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy488 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Fast Track Clinical Research
Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle
Sorbets, Emmanuel
Bhatt, Deepak L
Ducrocq, Gregory
Elbez, Yedid
Ferrari, Roberto
Ford, Ian
Tardif, Jean-Claude
Tendera, Michal
Fox, Kim M
Steg, Philippe Gabriel
Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry
title Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry
title_full Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry
title_fullStr Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry
title_full_unstemmed Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry
title_short Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry
title_sort potential impact of the 2017 acc/aha guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the clarify registry
topic Fast Track Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30124796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy488
work_keys_str_mv AT vidalpetiotemmanuelle potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry
AT sorbetsemmanuel potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry
AT bhattdeepakl potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry
AT ducrocqgregory potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry
AT elbezyedid potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry
AT ferrariroberto potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry
AT fordian potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry
AT tardifjeanclaude potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry
AT tenderamichal potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry
AT foxkimm potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry
AT stegphilippegabriel potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry