Cargando…
Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry
AIMS: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline on high blood pressure (BP) lowered the threshold defining hypertension and BP target in high-risk patients to 130/80 mmHg. Patients with coronary artery disease and systolic BP 130–139 mmHg or diastolic BP...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30124796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy488 |
_version_ | 1783370789480824832 |
---|---|
author | Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle Sorbets, Emmanuel Bhatt, Deepak L Ducrocq, Gregory Elbez, Yedid Ferrari, Roberto Ford, Ian Tardif, Jean-Claude Tendera, Michal Fox, Kim M Steg, Philippe Gabriel |
author_facet | Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle Sorbets, Emmanuel Bhatt, Deepak L Ducrocq, Gregory Elbez, Yedid Ferrari, Roberto Ford, Ian Tardif, Jean-Claude Tendera, Michal Fox, Kim M Steg, Philippe Gabriel |
author_sort | Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline on high blood pressure (BP) lowered the threshold defining hypertension and BP target in high-risk patients to 130/80 mmHg. Patients with coronary artery disease and systolic BP 130–139 mmHg or diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg should now receive medication to achieve this target. We aimed to investigate the relationship between BP and cardiovascular events in ‘real-life’ patients with coronary artery disease considered as having normal BP until the recent guideline. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 5956 patients with stable coronary artery disease, no history of hypertension or heart failure, and average BP <140/90 mmHg, enrolled in the CLARIFY registry (November 2009 to June 2010), were analysed. In a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, after a median follow-up of 5.0 years, diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg, but not systolic BP 130–139 mmHg, was associated with increased risk of the primary endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.22–3.81 vs. 70–79 mmHg and 1.12, 0.64–1.97 vs. 120–129 mmHg). No significant increase in risk for the primary endpoint was observed for systolic BP <120 mmHg or diastolic BP <70 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In patients with stable coronary artery disease defined as having normal BP according to the 140/90 mmHg threshold, diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg was associated with increased cardiovascular risk, whereas systolic BP 130–139 mmHg was not, supporting the lower diastolic but not the lower systolic BP hypertension-defining threshold and treatment target in coronary artery disease. CLINICALTRIALS IDENTIFIER: ISRCTN43070564. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6234847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62348472018-11-19 Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle Sorbets, Emmanuel Bhatt, Deepak L Ducrocq, Gregory Elbez, Yedid Ferrari, Roberto Ford, Ian Tardif, Jean-Claude Tendera, Michal Fox, Kim M Steg, Philippe Gabriel Eur Heart J Fast Track Clinical Research AIMS: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline on high blood pressure (BP) lowered the threshold defining hypertension and BP target in high-risk patients to 130/80 mmHg. Patients with coronary artery disease and systolic BP 130–139 mmHg or diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg should now receive medication to achieve this target. We aimed to investigate the relationship between BP and cardiovascular events in ‘real-life’ patients with coronary artery disease considered as having normal BP until the recent guideline. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 5956 patients with stable coronary artery disease, no history of hypertension or heart failure, and average BP <140/90 mmHg, enrolled in the CLARIFY registry (November 2009 to June 2010), were analysed. In a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, after a median follow-up of 5.0 years, diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg, but not systolic BP 130–139 mmHg, was associated with increased risk of the primary endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.22–3.81 vs. 70–79 mmHg and 1.12, 0.64–1.97 vs. 120–129 mmHg). No significant increase in risk for the primary endpoint was observed for systolic BP <120 mmHg or diastolic BP <70 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In patients with stable coronary artery disease defined as having normal BP according to the 140/90 mmHg threshold, diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg was associated with increased cardiovascular risk, whereas systolic BP 130–139 mmHg was not, supporting the lower diastolic but not the lower systolic BP hypertension-defining threshold and treatment target in coronary artery disease. CLINICALTRIALS IDENTIFIER: ISRCTN43070564. Oxford University Press 2018-11-14 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6234847/ /pubmed/30124796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy488 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Fast Track Clinical Research Vidal-Petiot, Emmanuelle Sorbets, Emmanuel Bhatt, Deepak L Ducrocq, Gregory Elbez, Yedid Ferrari, Roberto Ford, Ian Tardif, Jean-Claude Tendera, Michal Fox, Kim M Steg, Philippe Gabriel Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry |
title | Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry |
title_full | Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry |
title_fullStr | Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry |
title_short | Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry |
title_sort | potential impact of the 2017 acc/aha guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the clarify registry |
topic | Fast Track Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30124796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy488 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vidalpetiotemmanuelle potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry AT sorbetsemmanuel potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry AT bhattdeepakl potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry AT ducrocqgregory potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry AT elbezyedid potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry AT ferrariroberto potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry AT fordian potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry AT tardifjeanclaude potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry AT tenderamichal potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry AT foxkimm potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry AT stegphilippegabriel potentialimpactofthe2017accahaguidelineonhighbloodpressureinnormotensivepatientswithstablecoronaryarterydiseaseinsightsfromtheclarifyregistry |