Cargando…

Who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? Investigating stakeholders’ opinions using modified Delphi approach

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to realize that learning in a clinical setting, the interactions of the students with teachers, learning materials, and learning environments are essential. In clinical education, different groups may play the role of the teacher for medical students. This stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaterjalali, Maria, Yamani, Nikoo, Changiz, Tahereh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6235154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30519136
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S176480
_version_ 1783370830726561792
author Shaterjalali, Maria
Yamani, Nikoo
Changiz, Tahereh
author_facet Shaterjalali, Maria
Yamani, Nikoo
Changiz, Tahereh
author_sort Shaterjalali, Maria
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to realize that learning in a clinical setting, the interactions of the students with teachers, learning materials, and learning environments are essential. In clinical education, different groups may play the role of the teacher for medical students. This study was designed to determine the optimal characteristics for medical clinical teachers, their selection criteria, and their responsibilities. METHODS: The modified Delphi technique was used in this study. Participants comprised vice-chancellors of education, deans of medical schools, and deputies of education in medical schools across Iran. This study was conducted in three rounds. In the first round, the participants were selected using purposive sampling, and the data were collected through focus group discussions and analyzed through content analysis. The data collection tool in the second and third rounds involved a questionnaire derived from the first round, and the consensus criterion to accept or reject the questionnaire items was frequency distribution. RESULTS: The final number of statements in the first round was 157. The second-round questionnaire was designed in the four sections of teaching team, selection criteria, task description of the teaching team (including faculties, specialist staffs, residents, general practitioners, and health and treatment staff), and incentives separately for the specialist staff, residents, general practitioners, and health and treatment staff. The third-round questionnaire included feedback and items that were not agreed upon in the second round. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicated the necessity of forming a teaching team, paying attention to the selection criteria, and planning requirements for assigning responsibilities to the teaching team in accordance with the objectives, programs, and requirements of medical schools, along with using strategies to attract participation and create motivation in the teaching team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6235154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62351542018-12-05 Who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? Investigating stakeholders’ opinions using modified Delphi approach Shaterjalali, Maria Yamani, Nikoo Changiz, Tahereh Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to realize that learning in a clinical setting, the interactions of the students with teachers, learning materials, and learning environments are essential. In clinical education, different groups may play the role of the teacher for medical students. This study was designed to determine the optimal characteristics for medical clinical teachers, their selection criteria, and their responsibilities. METHODS: The modified Delphi technique was used in this study. Participants comprised vice-chancellors of education, deans of medical schools, and deputies of education in medical schools across Iran. This study was conducted in three rounds. In the first round, the participants were selected using purposive sampling, and the data were collected through focus group discussions and analyzed through content analysis. The data collection tool in the second and third rounds involved a questionnaire derived from the first round, and the consensus criterion to accept or reject the questionnaire items was frequency distribution. RESULTS: The final number of statements in the first round was 157. The second-round questionnaire was designed in the four sections of teaching team, selection criteria, task description of the teaching team (including faculties, specialist staffs, residents, general practitioners, and health and treatment staff), and incentives separately for the specialist staff, residents, general practitioners, and health and treatment staff. The third-round questionnaire included feedback and items that were not agreed upon in the second round. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicated the necessity of forming a teaching team, paying attention to the selection criteria, and planning requirements for assigning responsibilities to the teaching team in accordance with the objectives, programs, and requirements of medical schools, along with using strategies to attract participation and create motivation in the teaching team. Dove Medical Press 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6235154/ /pubmed/30519136 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S176480 Text en © 2018 Shaterjalali et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shaterjalali, Maria
Yamani, Nikoo
Changiz, Tahereh
Who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? Investigating stakeholders’ opinions using modified Delphi approach
title Who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? Investigating stakeholders’ opinions using modified Delphi approach
title_full Who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? Investigating stakeholders’ opinions using modified Delphi approach
title_fullStr Who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? Investigating stakeholders’ opinions using modified Delphi approach
title_full_unstemmed Who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? Investigating stakeholders’ opinions using modified Delphi approach
title_short Who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? Investigating stakeholders’ opinions using modified Delphi approach
title_sort who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? investigating stakeholders’ opinions using modified delphi approach
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6235154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30519136
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S176480
work_keys_str_mv AT shaterjalalimaria whoaretherightteachersformedicalclinicalstudentsinvestigatingstakeholdersopinionsusingmodifieddelphiapproach
AT yamaninikoo whoaretherightteachersformedicalclinicalstudentsinvestigatingstakeholdersopinionsusingmodifieddelphiapproach
AT changiztahereh whoaretherightteachersformedicalclinicalstudentsinvestigatingstakeholdersopinionsusingmodifieddelphiapproach