Cargando…
Guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: The use of heuristics
BACKGROUND: End of life care (EOLC) for people with dementia can present a multitude of challenges and difficult decisions for practitioners. These challenges may include assessment and management of difficulties with eating and swallowing, responding to agitation, treating pain, and managing recurr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6235299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30427873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206422 |
_version_ | 1783370852487659520 |
---|---|
author | Davies, Nathan Manthorpe, Jill Sampson, Elizabeth L. Lamahewa, Kethakie Wilcock, Jane Mathew, Rammya Iliffe, Steve |
author_facet | Davies, Nathan Manthorpe, Jill Sampson, Elizabeth L. Lamahewa, Kethakie Wilcock, Jane Mathew, Rammya Iliffe, Steve |
author_sort | Davies, Nathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: End of life care (EOLC) for people with dementia can present a multitude of challenges and difficult decisions for practitioners. These challenges may include assessment and management of difficulties with eating and swallowing, responding to agitation, treating pain, and managing recurrent infections. Practitioners sometimes lack both confidence in making end of life decisions and guidance. This study developed an alternative to lengthy guidelines, in the form of heuristics which were tested in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to test the usability and acceptability of a set of heuristics which could be used by practitioners providing EOLC for people with dementia in a variety of clinical and care settings. METHODS: A three phase co-design process was adopted: 1) Synthesis of evidence and outputs from interviews and focus groups with family carers and practitioners, by a co-design group, to develop heuristics; 2) Testing of the heuristics in five clinical or care settings for six months; 3) Evaluation of the heuristics at three and six months using qualitative individual and group interviews. RESULTS: Four heuristics were developed covering: eating and swallowing difficulties, agitation and restlessness, reviewing treatment and interventions at the end of life, and providing routine care. The five sites reported that the heuristics were simple and easy to use, comprehensive, and made implicit, tacit knowledge explicit. Four themes emerged from the qualitative evaluation: authority and permission; synthesis of best practice; providing a structure and breaking down complexity; and reassurance and instilling confidence. CONCLUSION: Use of heuristics is a novel approach to end of life decision making in dementia which can be useful to both experienced and junior members of staff making decisions. Heuristics are a practical tool which could overcome a lack of care pathways and direct guidance in end of life care for people with dementia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6235299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62352992018-12-01 Guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: The use of heuristics Davies, Nathan Manthorpe, Jill Sampson, Elizabeth L. Lamahewa, Kethakie Wilcock, Jane Mathew, Rammya Iliffe, Steve PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: End of life care (EOLC) for people with dementia can present a multitude of challenges and difficult decisions for practitioners. These challenges may include assessment and management of difficulties with eating and swallowing, responding to agitation, treating pain, and managing recurrent infections. Practitioners sometimes lack both confidence in making end of life decisions and guidance. This study developed an alternative to lengthy guidelines, in the form of heuristics which were tested in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to test the usability and acceptability of a set of heuristics which could be used by practitioners providing EOLC for people with dementia in a variety of clinical and care settings. METHODS: A three phase co-design process was adopted: 1) Synthesis of evidence and outputs from interviews and focus groups with family carers and practitioners, by a co-design group, to develop heuristics; 2) Testing of the heuristics in five clinical or care settings for six months; 3) Evaluation of the heuristics at three and six months using qualitative individual and group interviews. RESULTS: Four heuristics were developed covering: eating and swallowing difficulties, agitation and restlessness, reviewing treatment and interventions at the end of life, and providing routine care. The five sites reported that the heuristics were simple and easy to use, comprehensive, and made implicit, tacit knowledge explicit. Four themes emerged from the qualitative evaluation: authority and permission; synthesis of best practice; providing a structure and breaking down complexity; and reassurance and instilling confidence. CONCLUSION: Use of heuristics is a novel approach to end of life decision making in dementia which can be useful to both experienced and junior members of staff making decisions. Heuristics are a practical tool which could overcome a lack of care pathways and direct guidance in end of life care for people with dementia. Public Library of Science 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6235299/ /pubmed/30427873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206422 Text en © 2018 Davies et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Davies, Nathan Manthorpe, Jill Sampson, Elizabeth L. Lamahewa, Kethakie Wilcock, Jane Mathew, Rammya Iliffe, Steve Guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: The use of heuristics |
title | Guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: The use of heuristics |
title_full | Guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: The use of heuristics |
title_fullStr | Guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: The use of heuristics |
title_full_unstemmed | Guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: The use of heuristics |
title_short | Guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: The use of heuristics |
title_sort | guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: the use of heuristics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6235299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30427873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daviesnathan guidingpractitionersthroughendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiatheuseofheuristics AT manthorpejill guidingpractitionersthroughendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiatheuseofheuristics AT sampsonelizabethl guidingpractitionersthroughendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiatheuseofheuristics AT lamahewakethakie guidingpractitionersthroughendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiatheuseofheuristics AT wilcockjane guidingpractitionersthroughendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiatheuseofheuristics AT mathewrammya guidingpractitionersthroughendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiatheuseofheuristics AT iliffesteve guidingpractitionersthroughendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiatheuseofheuristics |