Comparative Assessment of Cephalometric and Tympanometric Readings in Down Syndrome

Aim The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative assessment of the various cephalometric and auditory parameters between patients with Down syndrome (DS) and healthy controls. Methods The cephalometric and auditory parameters were divided among 50 participants into two equal sets, DS (n = 25) and controls (n=25), and assessed. While a standard cephalometric analysis was conducted to measure the hard tissue parameters, tympanometry was used to assess the audiological parameters. Results The values of the linear and angular cephalometric parameters of the DS group were found to be lower than the controls. All the controls recorded type A tympanogram while the DS group recorded type A, B, and C tympanograms. A significant relationship was observed in the cephalometric readings – eustachian tube (ET) length, posterior upper facial height (PUFH) length, sella (s)-basion (ba)-palatal length (PL), and s-ba-ET angles – among the subjects who presented with type B or C tympanogram in comparison to those with type A. Conclusion Tympanometry, a highly sensitive and relatively simple test to assess audiological parameters, has a significant relationship with a number of cephalometric indicators of growth and development. A deviation from the normal tympanometric readings can be used as an early indicator of the impending craniometric aberrations and handicap. This can be used as an effective tool for early intervention in cases of DS. Patients who have recorded abnormal tympanograms on multiple occasions over a period of six months can be subjected to a further cephalometric analysis.