Cargando…

Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis

BACKGROUND: Digital technology has the potential to improve outcomes for people with psychosis. However, to date, research has largely ignored service user views on digital health interventions (DHIs). OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to explore early psychosis service users’ subjective vie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bucci, Sandra, Morris, Rohan, Berry, Katherine, Berry, Natalie, Haddock, Gillian, Barrowclough, Christine, Lewis, Shôn, Edge, Dawn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30381280
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10091
_version_ 1783370984039907328
author Bucci, Sandra
Morris, Rohan
Berry, Katherine
Berry, Natalie
Haddock, Gillian
Barrowclough, Christine
Lewis, Shôn
Edge, Dawn
author_facet Bucci, Sandra
Morris, Rohan
Berry, Katherine
Berry, Natalie
Haddock, Gillian
Barrowclough, Christine
Lewis, Shôn
Edge, Dawn
author_sort Bucci, Sandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital technology has the potential to improve outcomes for people with psychosis. However, to date, research has largely ignored service user views on digital health interventions (DHIs). OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to explore early psychosis service users’ subjective views on DHIs. METHODS: Framework analysis was undertaken with data obtained from 21 semistructured interviews with people registered with early intervention for psychosis services. Robust measures were used to develop a stable framework, including member checking, triangulation, independent verification of themes, and consensus meetings. RESULTS: The following 4 themes were established a priori: acceptability of technology in psychosis and mental health; technology increasing access to and augmenting mental health support; barriers to adopting DHIs; and concerns about management of data protection, privacy, risk, and security of information. The following 2 themes were generated a posteriori: blending DHIs with face-to-face treatment and empowerment, control, and choice. DHIs were also viewed as potentially destigmatizing, overcoming barriers faced in traditional service settings, facilitating communication, and empowering service users to take active control of their health care. CONCLUSIONS: In the first study of its kind, early psychosis service users’ were largely positive about the potential use of DHIs supporting and managing mental health. Overall, service users felt that DHIs were a progressive, modern, and relevant platform for health care delivery. Concerns were expressed around privacy and data security and practical barriers inherent within DHIs, all of which require further attention. Future research should explore whether findings transfer to other service user groups, other technology delivery formats, and across a range of treatment modalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6236205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62362052018-12-10 Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis Bucci, Sandra Morris, Rohan Berry, Katherine Berry, Natalie Haddock, Gillian Barrowclough, Christine Lewis, Shôn Edge, Dawn JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: Digital technology has the potential to improve outcomes for people with psychosis. However, to date, research has largely ignored service user views on digital health interventions (DHIs). OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to explore early psychosis service users’ subjective views on DHIs. METHODS: Framework analysis was undertaken with data obtained from 21 semistructured interviews with people registered with early intervention for psychosis services. Robust measures were used to develop a stable framework, including member checking, triangulation, independent verification of themes, and consensus meetings. RESULTS: The following 4 themes were established a priori: acceptability of technology in psychosis and mental health; technology increasing access to and augmenting mental health support; barriers to adopting DHIs; and concerns about management of data protection, privacy, risk, and security of information. The following 2 themes were generated a posteriori: blending DHIs with face-to-face treatment and empowerment, control, and choice. DHIs were also viewed as potentially destigmatizing, overcoming barriers faced in traditional service settings, facilitating communication, and empowering service users to take active control of their health care. CONCLUSIONS: In the first study of its kind, early psychosis service users’ were largely positive about the potential use of DHIs supporting and managing mental health. Overall, service users felt that DHIs were a progressive, modern, and relevant platform for health care delivery. Concerns were expressed around privacy and data security and practical barriers inherent within DHIs, all of which require further attention. Future research should explore whether findings transfer to other service user groups, other technology delivery formats, and across a range of treatment modalities. JMIR Publications 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6236205/ /pubmed/30381280 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10091 Text en ©Sandra Bucci, Rohan Morris, Katherine Berry, Natalie Berry, Gillian Haddock, Christine Barrowclough, Shôn Lewis, Dawn Edge. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 31.10.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bucci, Sandra
Morris, Rohan
Berry, Katherine
Berry, Natalie
Haddock, Gillian
Barrowclough, Christine
Lewis, Shôn
Edge, Dawn
Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis
title Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis
title_full Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis
title_fullStr Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis
title_short Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis
title_sort early psychosis service user views on digital technology: qualitative analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30381280
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10091
work_keys_str_mv AT buccisandra earlypsychosisserviceuserviewsondigitaltechnologyqualitativeanalysis
AT morrisrohan earlypsychosisserviceuserviewsondigitaltechnologyqualitativeanalysis
AT berrykatherine earlypsychosisserviceuserviewsondigitaltechnologyqualitativeanalysis
AT berrynatalie earlypsychosisserviceuserviewsondigitaltechnologyqualitativeanalysis
AT haddockgillian earlypsychosisserviceuserviewsondigitaltechnologyqualitativeanalysis
AT barrowcloughchristine earlypsychosisserviceuserviewsondigitaltechnologyqualitativeanalysis
AT lewisshon earlypsychosisserviceuserviewsondigitaltechnologyqualitativeanalysis
AT edgedawn earlypsychosisserviceuserviewsondigitaltechnologyqualitativeanalysis