Cargando…

Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Cranioplasty is a surgical technique applied for the reconstruction of the skullcap removed during decompressive craniectomy (DC). Cranioplasty improves rehabilitation from a motor and cognitive perspective. However, it may increase the possibility of postoperative complications, such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Cola, Maria C., Corallo, Francesco, Pria, Deborah, Lo Buono, Viviana, Calabrò, Rocco S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30280509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1106
_version_ 1783370994010816512
author De Cola, Maria C.
Corallo, Francesco
Pria, Deborah
Lo Buono, Viviana
Calabrò, Rocco S.
author_facet De Cola, Maria C.
Corallo, Francesco
Pria, Deborah
Lo Buono, Viviana
Calabrò, Rocco S.
author_sort De Cola, Maria C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cranioplasty is a surgical technique applied for the reconstruction of the skullcap removed during decompressive craniectomy (DC). Cranioplasty improves rehabilitation from a motor and cognitive perspective. However, it may increase the possibility of postoperative complications, such as seizures and infections. Timing of cranioplasty is therefore crucial even though literature is controversial. In this study, we compared motor and cognitive effects of early cranioplasty after DC and assess the optimal timing to perform it. METHODS: A literature research was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. We selected studies including at least one of the following test: Mini‐Mental State Examination, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test immediate and 30‐min delayed recall, Digit Span Test, Glasgow Coma Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Coma Recovery Scale‐Revised, Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale, Functional Independence Measure, and Barthel Index. RESULTS: Six articles and two systematic reviews were included in the present study. Analysis of changes in pre‐ and postcranioplasty scores showed that an early procedure (within 90 days from decompressive craniectomy) is more effective in improving motor functions (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.51 [0.05; 0.97], p‐value = 0.03), whereas an early procedure did not significantly improve neither MMSE score (SMD = 0.06 [−0.49; 0.61], p‐value = 0.83) nor memory functions (SMD = −0.63 [−0.97; −0.28], p‐value < 0.001). No statistical significance emerged when we compared studies according to the timing from DC. CONCLUSIONS: It is believed that cranioplasty performed from 3 to 6 months after DC may significantly improve both motor and cognitive recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6236242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62362422018-11-20 Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review De Cola, Maria C. Corallo, Francesco Pria, Deborah Lo Buono, Viviana Calabrò, Rocco S. Brain Behav Reviews INTRODUCTION: Cranioplasty is a surgical technique applied for the reconstruction of the skullcap removed during decompressive craniectomy (DC). Cranioplasty improves rehabilitation from a motor and cognitive perspective. However, it may increase the possibility of postoperative complications, such as seizures and infections. Timing of cranioplasty is therefore crucial even though literature is controversial. In this study, we compared motor and cognitive effects of early cranioplasty after DC and assess the optimal timing to perform it. METHODS: A literature research was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. We selected studies including at least one of the following test: Mini‐Mental State Examination, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test immediate and 30‐min delayed recall, Digit Span Test, Glasgow Coma Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Coma Recovery Scale‐Revised, Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale, Functional Independence Measure, and Barthel Index. RESULTS: Six articles and two systematic reviews were included in the present study. Analysis of changes in pre‐ and postcranioplasty scores showed that an early procedure (within 90 days from decompressive craniectomy) is more effective in improving motor functions (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.51 [0.05; 0.97], p‐value = 0.03), whereas an early procedure did not significantly improve neither MMSE score (SMD = 0.06 [−0.49; 0.61], p‐value = 0.83) nor memory functions (SMD = −0.63 [−0.97; −0.28], p‐value < 0.001). No statistical significance emerged when we compared studies according to the timing from DC. CONCLUSIONS: It is believed that cranioplasty performed from 3 to 6 months after DC may significantly improve both motor and cognitive recovery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6236242/ /pubmed/30280509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1106 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
De Cola, Maria C.
Corallo, Francesco
Pria, Deborah
Lo Buono, Viviana
Calabrò, Rocco S.
Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review
title Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review
title_full Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review
title_fullStr Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review
title_short Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review
title_sort timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30280509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1106
work_keys_str_mv AT decolamariac timingforcranioplastytoimproveneurologicaloutcomeasystematicreview
AT corallofrancesco timingforcranioplastytoimproveneurologicaloutcomeasystematicreview
AT priadeborah timingforcranioplastytoimproveneurologicaloutcomeasystematicreview
AT lobuonoviviana timingforcranioplastytoimproveneurologicaloutcomeasystematicreview
AT calabroroccos timingforcranioplastytoimproveneurologicaloutcomeasystematicreview