Cargando…
Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials to organise and map current literature
BACKGROUND: Recruiting the target number of participants within the pre-specified time frame agreed with funders remains a common challenge in the completion of a successful clinical trial and addressing this is an important methodological priority. While there is growing research around recruitment...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774518796156 |
_version_ | 1783371058720538624 |
---|---|
author | Kearney, Anna Harman, Nicola L Rosala-Hallas, Anna Beecher, Claire Blazeby, Jane M Bower, Peter Clarke, Mike Cragg, William Duane, Sinead Gardner, Heidi Healy, Patricia Maguire, Lisa Mills, Nicola Rooshenas, Leila Rowlands, Ceri Treweek, Shaun Vellinga, Akke Williamson, Paula R Gamble, Carrol |
author_facet | Kearney, Anna Harman, Nicola L Rosala-Hallas, Anna Beecher, Claire Blazeby, Jane M Bower, Peter Clarke, Mike Cragg, William Duane, Sinead Gardner, Heidi Healy, Patricia Maguire, Lisa Mills, Nicola Rooshenas, Leila Rowlands, Ceri Treweek, Shaun Vellinga, Akke Williamson, Paula R Gamble, Carrol |
author_sort | Kearney, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recruiting the target number of participants within the pre-specified time frame agreed with funders remains a common challenge in the completion of a successful clinical trial and addressing this is an important methodological priority. While there is growing research around recruitment, navigating this literature to support an evidence-based approach remains difficult. The Online resource for Recruitment Research in Clinical triAls project aims to create an online searchable database of recruitment research to improve access to existing evidence and to identify gaps for future research. METHODS: MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Methodology Register, Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index within the ISI Web of Science and Education Resources Information Center were searched in January 2015. Search strategy results were screened by title and abstract, and full text obtained for potentially eligible articles. Studies reporting or evaluating strategies, interventions or methods used to recruit patients were included along with case reports and studies exploring reasons for patient participation or non-participation. Eligible articles were categorised as systematic reviews, nested randomised controlled trials and other designs evaluating the effects of recruitment strategies (Level 1); studies that report the use of recruitment strategies without an evaluation of impact (Level 2); or articles reporting factors affecting recruitment without presenting a particular recruitment strategy (Level 3). Articles were also assigned to 1, or more, of 42 predefined recruitment domains grouped under 6 categories. RESULTS: More than 60,000 records were retrieved by the search, resulting in 56,030 unique titles and abstracts for screening, with a further 23 found through hand searches. A total of 4570 full text articles were checked; 2804 were eligible. Six percent of the included articles evaluated the effectiveness of a recruitment strategy (Level 1), with most of these assessing aspects of participant information, either its method of delivery (33%) or its content and format (28%). DISCUSSION: Recruitment to clinical trials remains a common challenge and an important area for future research. The online resource for Recruitment Research in Clinical triAls project provides a searchable, online database of research relevant to recruitment. The project has identified the need for researchers to evaluate their recruitment strategies to improve the evidence base and broaden the narrow focus of existing research to help meet the complex challenges faced by those recruiting to clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6236587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62365872018-12-10 Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials to organise and map current literature Kearney, Anna Harman, Nicola L Rosala-Hallas, Anna Beecher, Claire Blazeby, Jane M Bower, Peter Clarke, Mike Cragg, William Duane, Sinead Gardner, Heidi Healy, Patricia Maguire, Lisa Mills, Nicola Rooshenas, Leila Rowlands, Ceri Treweek, Shaun Vellinga, Akke Williamson, Paula R Gamble, Carrol Clin Trials Recruitment and Retention BACKGROUND: Recruiting the target number of participants within the pre-specified time frame agreed with funders remains a common challenge in the completion of a successful clinical trial and addressing this is an important methodological priority. While there is growing research around recruitment, navigating this literature to support an evidence-based approach remains difficult. The Online resource for Recruitment Research in Clinical triAls project aims to create an online searchable database of recruitment research to improve access to existing evidence and to identify gaps for future research. METHODS: MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Methodology Register, Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index within the ISI Web of Science and Education Resources Information Center were searched in January 2015. Search strategy results were screened by title and abstract, and full text obtained for potentially eligible articles. Studies reporting or evaluating strategies, interventions or methods used to recruit patients were included along with case reports and studies exploring reasons for patient participation or non-participation. Eligible articles were categorised as systematic reviews, nested randomised controlled trials and other designs evaluating the effects of recruitment strategies (Level 1); studies that report the use of recruitment strategies without an evaluation of impact (Level 2); or articles reporting factors affecting recruitment without presenting a particular recruitment strategy (Level 3). Articles were also assigned to 1, or more, of 42 predefined recruitment domains grouped under 6 categories. RESULTS: More than 60,000 records were retrieved by the search, resulting in 56,030 unique titles and abstracts for screening, with a further 23 found through hand searches. A total of 4570 full text articles were checked; 2804 were eligible. Six percent of the included articles evaluated the effectiveness of a recruitment strategy (Level 1), with most of these assessing aspects of participant information, either its method of delivery (33%) or its content and format (28%). DISCUSSION: Recruitment to clinical trials remains a common challenge and an important area for future research. The online resource for Recruitment Research in Clinical triAls project provides a searchable, online database of research relevant to recruitment. The project has identified the need for researchers to evaluate their recruitment strategies to improve the evidence base and broaden the narrow focus of existing research to help meet the complex challenges faced by those recruiting to clinical trials. SAGE Publications 2018-08-31 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6236587/ /pubmed/30165760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774518796156 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Recruitment and Retention Kearney, Anna Harman, Nicola L Rosala-Hallas, Anna Beecher, Claire Blazeby, Jane M Bower, Peter Clarke, Mike Cragg, William Duane, Sinead Gardner, Heidi Healy, Patricia Maguire, Lisa Mills, Nicola Rooshenas, Leila Rowlands, Ceri Treweek, Shaun Vellinga, Akke Williamson, Paula R Gamble, Carrol Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials to organise and map current literature |
title | Development of an online resource for recruitment research in
clinical trials to organise and map current literature |
title_full | Development of an online resource for recruitment research in
clinical trials to organise and map current literature |
title_fullStr | Development of an online resource for recruitment research in
clinical trials to organise and map current literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of an online resource for recruitment research in
clinical trials to organise and map current literature |
title_short | Development of an online resource for recruitment research in
clinical trials to organise and map current literature |
title_sort | development of an online resource for recruitment research in
clinical trials to organise and map current literature |
topic | Recruitment and Retention |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774518796156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kearneyanna developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT harmannicolal developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT rosalahallasanna developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT beecherclaire developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT blazebyjanem developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT bowerpeter developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT clarkemike developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT craggwilliam developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT duanesinead developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT gardnerheidi developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT healypatricia developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT maguirelisa developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT millsnicola developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT rooshenasleila developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT rowlandsceri developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT treweekshaun developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT vellingaakke developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT williamsonpaular developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature AT gamblecarrol developmentofanonlineresourceforrecruitmentresearchinclinicaltrialstoorganiseandmapcurrentliterature |