Determinants of Left Ventricular Characteristics Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cardiovascular Biomarkers Related to Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging accurately and precisely measures left ventricular (LV) mass and function. Identifying mechanisms by which LV mass change and functional improvement occur in some end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients may help to appropriately target kidney transplant (KT) recipients for further investigation and intervention. The concentration of serum adiponectin, a cardiovascular biomarker, increases in cardiac failure, its production being enhanced by B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and both serum adiponectin and BNP concentrations decline posttransplantation. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that kidney transplantation alters LV characteristics that relate to serum adiponectin concentrations. DESIGN: Prospective and observational cohort study. SETTING: The study was performed at 3 adult kidney transplant and dialysis centers in Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: A total of 82 KT candidate subjects were recruited (39 to the KT group and 43 to the dialysis group). Predialysis patients were excluded. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects underwent CMR with a 1.5-tesla whole-body magnetic resonance scanner using a phased-array cardiac coil and retrospective vectorographic gating. LV mass, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) were measured by CMR pre-KT and again 12 months post-KT (N = 39), or 12 months later if still receiving dialysis (N = 43). LV mass, LVESV, and LVEDV were indexed for height (m(2.7)) to calculate left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), respectively. Serum total adiponectin and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) concentrations were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. METHODS: We performed a prospective 1:1 observational study comparing KT candidates with ESKD either receiving a living donor organ (KT group) or waiting for a deceased donor organ (dialysis group). RESULTS: Left ventricular mass index change was −1.98 ± 5.5 and −0.36 ± 5.7 g/m(2.7) for KT versus dialysis subjects (P = .44). Left ventricular mass change was associated with systolic blood pressure (SBP) (P = .0008) and average LV mass (P = .0001). Left ventricular ejection fraction did not improve (2.9 ± 6.6 vs 0.7 ± 4.9 %, P = .09), while LVESVI and LVEDVI decreased more post-KT than with continued dialysis (−3.36 ± 5.6 vs −0.22 ± 4.4 mL/m(2.7), P < .01 and −4.9 ± 8.5 vs −0.3 ± 9.2 mL/m(2.7), P = .02). Both adiponectin (−7.1 ± 11.3 vs −0.11 ± 7.9 µg/mL, P < .0001) and NT-proBNP (−3811 ± 8130 vs 1665 ± 20013 pg/mL, P < .0001) declined post-KT. Post-KT adiponectin correlated with NT-proBNP (P = .001), but not estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (P = .13). Change in adiponectin did not correlate with change in LVEF in the KT group (Spearman ρ = 0.16, P = .31) or dialysis group (Spearman ρ = 0.19, P = .21). LIMITATIONS: Few biomarkers of cardiac function were measured to fully contextualize their role during changing kidney function. Limited intrapatient biomarker sampling and CMR measurements precluded constructing dose-response curves of biomarkers to LV mass and function. The CMR timing in relation to dialysis was not standardized. CONCLUSIONS: The LVESVI and LVEDVI but not LVMI or LVEF improve post-KT. LVMI and LVEF change is independent of renal function and adiponectin. As adiponectin correlates with NT-proBNP post-KT, improved renal function through KT restores the normal heart-endocrine axis.