Cargando…

Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: To date, there have been no published investigations on the cause of acetabular debonding, a rare failure phenomenon in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing where the acetabular porous coating delaminates from the implant while remaining well fixed to the pelvic bone. PURPOSES: This study aims...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Eric, Gaillard-Campbell, Dani, Gross, Thomas P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5282167
_version_ 1783371072305889280
author Robinson, Eric
Gaillard-Campbell, Dani
Gross, Thomas P.
author_facet Robinson, Eric
Gaillard-Campbell, Dani
Gross, Thomas P.
author_sort Robinson, Eric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, there have been no published investigations on the cause of acetabular debonding, a rare failure phenomenon in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing where the acetabular porous coating delaminates from the implant while remaining well fixed to the pelvic bone. PURPOSES: This study aims to summarize the current understanding of acetabular debonding and to investigate the discrepancy in rate of debonding between two implant systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To elucidate potential causes of debonding, we retrospectively analyzed a single-surgeon cohort of 839 hip resurfacing cases. Specifically, we compared rate of debonding and manufacturing processes between two implant systems. RESULTS: Group 1 experienced significantly more cases of debonding than Group 2 cases (4.0% versus 0.0%, p value<0.0001). Implant manufacturing processes differed in surface coating, heat treatment, postmanufacturing treatment, and apex thickness. Debonded implants were more likely to have missed RAIL guidelines (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We identified implant system, postoperative time, and acetabular component placement as variables contributing to rate of debonding. We recommend minimizing acetabular inclination angle according to RAIL guidelines. Further, we evaluated manufacturing differences between the two implant systems but did not have access to proprietary data to identify the cause of debonding. Both implants met ASTM standards, yet only the Group 1 implant debonded. This suggests the second implant had greater fatigue shear strength. Because the Group 2 implant achieved a more durable interface that did not debond, we suggest the ASTM F1160 standard for fatigue shear strength be increased to that achieved by its manufacturer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6236702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62367022018-12-04 Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty Robinson, Eric Gaillard-Campbell, Dani Gross, Thomas P. Adv Orthop Research Article BACKGROUND: To date, there have been no published investigations on the cause of acetabular debonding, a rare failure phenomenon in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing where the acetabular porous coating delaminates from the implant while remaining well fixed to the pelvic bone. PURPOSES: This study aims to summarize the current understanding of acetabular debonding and to investigate the discrepancy in rate of debonding between two implant systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To elucidate potential causes of debonding, we retrospectively analyzed a single-surgeon cohort of 839 hip resurfacing cases. Specifically, we compared rate of debonding and manufacturing processes between two implant systems. RESULTS: Group 1 experienced significantly more cases of debonding than Group 2 cases (4.0% versus 0.0%, p value<0.0001). Implant manufacturing processes differed in surface coating, heat treatment, postmanufacturing treatment, and apex thickness. Debonded implants were more likely to have missed RAIL guidelines (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We identified implant system, postoperative time, and acetabular component placement as variables contributing to rate of debonding. We recommend minimizing acetabular inclination angle according to RAIL guidelines. Further, we evaluated manufacturing differences between the two implant systems but did not have access to proprietary data to identify the cause of debonding. Both implants met ASTM standards, yet only the Group 1 implant debonded. This suggests the second implant had greater fatigue shear strength. Because the Group 2 implant achieved a more durable interface that did not debond, we suggest the ASTM F1160 standard for fatigue shear strength be increased to that achieved by its manufacturer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data. Hindawi 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6236702/ /pubmed/30515334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5282167 Text en Copyright © 2018 Eric Robinson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Robinson, Eric
Gaillard-Campbell, Dani
Gross, Thomas P.
Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
title Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
title_full Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
title_short Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
title_sort acetabular debonding: an investigation of porous coating delamination in hip resurfacing arthroplasty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5282167
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsoneric acetabulardebondinganinvestigationofporouscoatingdelaminationinhipresurfacingarthroplasty
AT gaillardcampbelldani acetabulardebondinganinvestigationofporouscoatingdelaminationinhipresurfacingarthroplasty
AT grossthomasp acetabulardebondinganinvestigationofporouscoatingdelaminationinhipresurfacingarthroplasty