Cargando…
Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
BACKGROUND: To date, there have been no published investigations on the cause of acetabular debonding, a rare failure phenomenon in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing where the acetabular porous coating delaminates from the implant while remaining well fixed to the pelvic bone. PURPOSES: This study aims...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5282167 |
_version_ | 1783371072305889280 |
---|---|
author | Robinson, Eric Gaillard-Campbell, Dani Gross, Thomas P. |
author_facet | Robinson, Eric Gaillard-Campbell, Dani Gross, Thomas P. |
author_sort | Robinson, Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, there have been no published investigations on the cause of acetabular debonding, a rare failure phenomenon in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing where the acetabular porous coating delaminates from the implant while remaining well fixed to the pelvic bone. PURPOSES: This study aims to summarize the current understanding of acetabular debonding and to investigate the discrepancy in rate of debonding between two implant systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To elucidate potential causes of debonding, we retrospectively analyzed a single-surgeon cohort of 839 hip resurfacing cases. Specifically, we compared rate of debonding and manufacturing processes between two implant systems. RESULTS: Group 1 experienced significantly more cases of debonding than Group 2 cases (4.0% versus 0.0%, p value<0.0001). Implant manufacturing processes differed in surface coating, heat treatment, postmanufacturing treatment, and apex thickness. Debonded implants were more likely to have missed RAIL guidelines (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We identified implant system, postoperative time, and acetabular component placement as variables contributing to rate of debonding. We recommend minimizing acetabular inclination angle according to RAIL guidelines. Further, we evaluated manufacturing differences between the two implant systems but did not have access to proprietary data to identify the cause of debonding. Both implants met ASTM standards, yet only the Group 1 implant debonded. This suggests the second implant had greater fatigue shear strength. Because the Group 2 implant achieved a more durable interface that did not debond, we suggest the ASTM F1160 standard for fatigue shear strength be increased to that achieved by its manufacturer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6236702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62367022018-12-04 Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty Robinson, Eric Gaillard-Campbell, Dani Gross, Thomas P. Adv Orthop Research Article BACKGROUND: To date, there have been no published investigations on the cause of acetabular debonding, a rare failure phenomenon in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing where the acetabular porous coating delaminates from the implant while remaining well fixed to the pelvic bone. PURPOSES: This study aims to summarize the current understanding of acetabular debonding and to investigate the discrepancy in rate of debonding between two implant systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To elucidate potential causes of debonding, we retrospectively analyzed a single-surgeon cohort of 839 hip resurfacing cases. Specifically, we compared rate of debonding and manufacturing processes between two implant systems. RESULTS: Group 1 experienced significantly more cases of debonding than Group 2 cases (4.0% versus 0.0%, p value<0.0001). Implant manufacturing processes differed in surface coating, heat treatment, postmanufacturing treatment, and apex thickness. Debonded implants were more likely to have missed RAIL guidelines (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We identified implant system, postoperative time, and acetabular component placement as variables contributing to rate of debonding. We recommend minimizing acetabular inclination angle according to RAIL guidelines. Further, we evaluated manufacturing differences between the two implant systems but did not have access to proprietary data to identify the cause of debonding. Both implants met ASTM standards, yet only the Group 1 implant debonded. This suggests the second implant had greater fatigue shear strength. Because the Group 2 implant achieved a more durable interface that did not debond, we suggest the ASTM F1160 standard for fatigue shear strength be increased to that achieved by its manufacturer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data. Hindawi 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6236702/ /pubmed/30515334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5282167 Text en Copyright © 2018 Eric Robinson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Robinson, Eric Gaillard-Campbell, Dani Gross, Thomas P. Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty |
title | Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty |
title_full | Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty |
title_short | Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty |
title_sort | acetabular debonding: an investigation of porous coating delamination in hip resurfacing arthroplasty |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5282167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robinsoneric acetabulardebondinganinvestigationofporouscoatingdelaminationinhipresurfacingarthroplasty AT gaillardcampbelldani acetabulardebondinganinvestigationofporouscoatingdelaminationinhipresurfacingarthroplasty AT grossthomasp acetabulardebondinganinvestigationofporouscoatingdelaminationinhipresurfacingarthroplasty |