Cargando…

Development of a dedicated phantom for multi‐target single‐isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing

PURPOSE: The aim of this project was to design and manufacture a cost‐effective end‐to‐end (E2E) phantom for quantifying the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of a linear accelerator based, multi‐target single‐isocenter (MTSI) frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technique. METHOD: A perspex Mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poder, Joel, Brown, Ryan, Porter, Harry, Gupta, Rashmi, Ralston, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12452
_version_ 1783371088243195904
author Poder, Joel
Brown, Ryan
Porter, Harry
Gupta, Rashmi
Ralston, Anna
author_facet Poder, Joel
Brown, Ryan
Porter, Harry
Gupta, Rashmi
Ralston, Anna
author_sort Poder, Joel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this project was to design and manufacture a cost‐effective end‐to‐end (E2E) phantom for quantifying the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of a linear accelerator based, multi‐target single‐isocenter (MTSI) frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technique. METHOD: A perspex Multi‐Plug device from a Sun Nuclear ArcCheck phantom (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) was enhanced to make it more applicable for MTSI SRS E2E testing. The following steps in the SRS chain were then analysed using the phantom: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) distortion, planning computed tomography (CT) scan and MRI image registration accuracy, phantom setup accuracy using CBCT, dosimetric accuracy using ion chamber, planar film dose measurements and coincidence of linear accelerator mega‐voltage (MV), and kilo‐voltage (kV) isocenters using Winston‐Lutz testing (WLT). RESULTS: The dedicated E2E phantom was able to successfully quantify the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of the MTSI SRS technique. MRI distortions were less than 0.5 mm, or half a voxel size. The average MRI‐CT registration accuracy was 0.15 mm (±0.31 mm), 0.20 mm (±0.16 mm), and 0.39 mm (±0.11 mm) in the superior/inferior, left/right and, anterior/posterior directions, respectively. The phantom setup accuracy using CBCT was better than 0.2 mm and 0.1°. Point dose measurements were within 5% of the treatment planning system predicted dose. The comparison of planar film doses to the planning system dose distributions, performed using gamma analysis, resulted in pass rates greater than 97% for 3%/1 mm gamma criteria. Finally, off‐axis WLT showed MV/kV coincidence to be within 1 mm for off‐axis distances up to 60 mm. CONCLUSION: A novel, versatile and cost‐effective phantom for comprehensive E2E testing of MTSI SRS treatments was developed, incorporating multiple detector types and fiducial markers. The phantom is capable of quantifying the accuracy of each step in the MTSI SRS planning and treatment process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6236824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62368242018-11-20 Development of a dedicated phantom for multi‐target single‐isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing Poder, Joel Brown, Ryan Porter, Harry Gupta, Rashmi Ralston, Anna J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The aim of this project was to design and manufacture a cost‐effective end‐to‐end (E2E) phantom for quantifying the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of a linear accelerator based, multi‐target single‐isocenter (MTSI) frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technique. METHOD: A perspex Multi‐Plug device from a Sun Nuclear ArcCheck phantom (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) was enhanced to make it more applicable for MTSI SRS E2E testing. The following steps in the SRS chain were then analysed using the phantom: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) distortion, planning computed tomography (CT) scan and MRI image registration accuracy, phantom setup accuracy using CBCT, dosimetric accuracy using ion chamber, planar film dose measurements and coincidence of linear accelerator mega‐voltage (MV), and kilo‐voltage (kV) isocenters using Winston‐Lutz testing (WLT). RESULTS: The dedicated E2E phantom was able to successfully quantify the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of the MTSI SRS technique. MRI distortions were less than 0.5 mm, or half a voxel size. The average MRI‐CT registration accuracy was 0.15 mm (±0.31 mm), 0.20 mm (±0.16 mm), and 0.39 mm (±0.11 mm) in the superior/inferior, left/right and, anterior/posterior directions, respectively. The phantom setup accuracy using CBCT was better than 0.2 mm and 0.1°. Point dose measurements were within 5% of the treatment planning system predicted dose. The comparison of planar film doses to the planning system dose distributions, performed using gamma analysis, resulted in pass rates greater than 97% for 3%/1 mm gamma criteria. Finally, off‐axis WLT showed MV/kV coincidence to be within 1 mm for off‐axis distances up to 60 mm. CONCLUSION: A novel, versatile and cost‐effective phantom for comprehensive E2E testing of MTSI SRS treatments was developed, incorporating multiple detector types and fiducial markers. The phantom is capable of quantifying the accuracy of each step in the MTSI SRS planning and treatment process. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6236824/ /pubmed/30221462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12452 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Poder, Joel
Brown, Ryan
Porter, Harry
Gupta, Rashmi
Ralston, Anna
Development of a dedicated phantom for multi‐target single‐isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing
title Development of a dedicated phantom for multi‐target single‐isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing
title_full Development of a dedicated phantom for multi‐target single‐isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing
title_fullStr Development of a dedicated phantom for multi‐target single‐isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing
title_full_unstemmed Development of a dedicated phantom for multi‐target single‐isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing
title_short Development of a dedicated phantom for multi‐target single‐isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing
title_sort development of a dedicated phantom for multi‐target single‐isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery end to end testing
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30221462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12452
work_keys_str_mv AT poderjoel developmentofadedicatedphantomformultitargetsingleisocentrestereotacticradiosurgeryendtoendtesting
AT brownryan developmentofadedicatedphantomformultitargetsingleisocentrestereotacticradiosurgeryendtoendtesting
AT porterharry developmentofadedicatedphantomformultitargetsingleisocentrestereotacticradiosurgeryendtoendtesting
AT guptarashmi developmentofadedicatedphantomformultitargetsingleisocentrestereotacticradiosurgeryendtoendtesting
AT ralstonanna developmentofadedicatedphantomformultitargetsingleisocentrestereotacticradiosurgeryendtoendtesting