Cargando…
Detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones
The purpose of this work is to assess eight detectors performance for output factor (OF), percent depth dose (PDD), and beam profiles in a 6‐MV Clinac stereotactic radiosurgery mode for cone irradiation using Monte Carlo simulation as reference. Cones with diameters comprised between 30 and 4 mm hav...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30216702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12449 |
_version_ | 1783371089973346304 |
---|---|
author | Garnier, Nicolas Amblard, Régis Villeneuve, Rémy Haykal, Rodolphe Ortholan, Cécile Colin, Philippe Gérard, Anaïs Belhomme, Sarah Mady, Franck Benabdesselam, Mourad Serrano, Benjamin |
author_facet | Garnier, Nicolas Amblard, Régis Villeneuve, Rémy Haykal, Rodolphe Ortholan, Cécile Colin, Philippe Gérard, Anaïs Belhomme, Sarah Mady, Franck Benabdesselam, Mourad Serrano, Benjamin |
author_sort | Garnier, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this work is to assess eight detectors performance for output factor (OF), percent depth dose (PDD), and beam profiles in a 6‐MV Clinac stereotactic radiosurgery mode for cone irradiation using Monte Carlo simulation as reference. Cones with diameters comprised between 30 and 4 mm have been studied. The evaluated detectors were ionization chambers: pinpoint and pinpoint 3D, diodes: SRS, P and E, Edge, MicroDiamond and EBT3 radiochromic films. The results showed that pinpoints underestimate OF up to −2.3% for cone diameters ≥10 mm and down to −12% for smaller cones. Both nonshielded (SRS and E) and shielded diodes (P and Edge) overestimate the OF respectively up to 3.3% and 5.2% for cone diameters ≥10 mm and in both cases more than 7% for smaller cones. MicroDiamond slightly overestimates the OF, 3.7% for all the cones and EBT3 film is the closest to Monte Carlo with maximum difference of ±1% whatever the cone size is. For the profiles and the PDD, particularly for the small cones, the size of the detector predominates. All diodes and EBT3 agree with the simulation within ±0.2 mm for beam profiles determination. For PDD curve all the active detectors response agree with simulation up to 1% for all the cones. EBT3 is the more accurate detector for beam profiles and OF determinations of stereotactic cones but it is restrictive to use. Due to respectively inappropriate size of the sensitive volume and composition, pinpoints and diodes do not seem appropriate without OF corrective factors below 10 mm diameter cone. MicroDiamond appears to be the best detector for OF determination regardless all cones. For off‐axis measurements, the size of the detector predominates and for PDD all detectors give promising results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6236831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62368312018-11-20 Detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones Garnier, Nicolas Amblard, Régis Villeneuve, Rémy Haykal, Rodolphe Ortholan, Cécile Colin, Philippe Gérard, Anaïs Belhomme, Sarah Mady, Franck Benabdesselam, Mourad Serrano, Benjamin J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this work is to assess eight detectors performance for output factor (OF), percent depth dose (PDD), and beam profiles in a 6‐MV Clinac stereotactic radiosurgery mode for cone irradiation using Monte Carlo simulation as reference. Cones with diameters comprised between 30 and 4 mm have been studied. The evaluated detectors were ionization chambers: pinpoint and pinpoint 3D, diodes: SRS, P and E, Edge, MicroDiamond and EBT3 radiochromic films. The results showed that pinpoints underestimate OF up to −2.3% for cone diameters ≥10 mm and down to −12% for smaller cones. Both nonshielded (SRS and E) and shielded diodes (P and Edge) overestimate the OF respectively up to 3.3% and 5.2% for cone diameters ≥10 mm and in both cases more than 7% for smaller cones. MicroDiamond slightly overestimates the OF, 3.7% for all the cones and EBT3 film is the closest to Monte Carlo with maximum difference of ±1% whatever the cone size is. For the profiles and the PDD, particularly for the small cones, the size of the detector predominates. All diodes and EBT3 agree with the simulation within ±0.2 mm for beam profiles determination. For PDD curve all the active detectors response agree with simulation up to 1% for all the cones. EBT3 is the more accurate detector for beam profiles and OF determinations of stereotactic cones but it is restrictive to use. Due to respectively inappropriate size of the sensitive volume and composition, pinpoints and diodes do not seem appropriate without OF corrective factors below 10 mm diameter cone. MicroDiamond appears to be the best detector for OF determination regardless all cones. For off‐axis measurements, the size of the detector predominates and for PDD all detectors give promising results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6236831/ /pubmed/30216702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12449 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Garnier, Nicolas Amblard, Régis Villeneuve, Rémy Haykal, Rodolphe Ortholan, Cécile Colin, Philippe Gérard, Anaïs Belhomme, Sarah Mady, Franck Benabdesselam, Mourad Serrano, Benjamin Detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones |
title | Detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones |
title_full | Detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones |
title_fullStr | Detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones |
title_full_unstemmed | Detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones |
title_short | Detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones |
title_sort | detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30216702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garniernicolas detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones AT amblardregis detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones AT villeneuveremy detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones AT haykalrodolphe detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones AT ortholancecile detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones AT colinphilippe detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones AT gerardanais detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones AT belhommesarah detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones AT madyfranck detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones AT benabdesselammourad detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones AT serranobenjamin detectorsassessmentforstereotacticradiosurgerywithcones |