Cargando…

Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation

Relative dose measurements with small ionization chambers in combination with an electrometer placed in the treatment room (“internal electrometer”) show a large dependence on the polarity used. While this was observed previously for percent depth dose curves (PDDs), the effect has not been understo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wegener, Sonja, Sauer, Otto A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30298980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12458
_version_ 1783371090249121792
author Wegener, Sonja
Sauer, Otto A.
author_facet Wegener, Sonja
Sauer, Otto A.
author_sort Wegener, Sonja
collection PubMed
description Relative dose measurements with small ionization chambers in combination with an electrometer placed in the treatment room (“internal electrometer”) show a large dependence on the polarity used. While this was observed previously for percent depth dose curves (PDDs), the effect has not been understood or preventable. To investigate the polarity dependence of internal electrometers used in conjunction with a small‐volume ionization chamber, we placed an internal electrometer at a distance of 1 m from the isocenter and exposed it to different amounts of scattered radiation by varying the field size. We identified irradiation of the electrometer to cause a current of approximately −1 pA, regardless of the sign of the biasing voltage. For low‐sensitivity detectors, such a current noticeably distorts relative dose measurements. To demonstrate how the current systematically changes PDDs, we collected measurements with nine ionization chambers of different volumes. As the chamber volume decreased, signal ratios at 20 and 10 cm depth (M20/M10) became smaller for positive bias voltage and larger for negative bias voltage. At the size of the iba CC04 (40 mm³) the difference of M20/M10 was around 1% and for the smallest studied chamber, the iba CC003 chamber (3 mm³), around 7% for a 10 × 10 cm² field. When the electrometer was moved further from the source or shielded, the additional current decreased. Consequently, PDDs at both polarities were brought into alignment at depth even for the 3 mm³ ionization chamber. The apparent polarity effect on PDDs and lateral beam profiles was reduced considerably by shielding the electrometer. Due to normalization the effect on output values was low. When measurements with a low‐sensitivity probe are carried out in conjunction with an internal electrometer, we recommend careful monitoring of the particular setup by testing both polarities, and if deemed necessary, we suggest shielding the electrometer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6236832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62368322018-11-20 Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation Wegener, Sonja Sauer, Otto A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements Relative dose measurements with small ionization chambers in combination with an electrometer placed in the treatment room (“internal electrometer”) show a large dependence on the polarity used. While this was observed previously for percent depth dose curves (PDDs), the effect has not been understood or preventable. To investigate the polarity dependence of internal electrometers used in conjunction with a small‐volume ionization chamber, we placed an internal electrometer at a distance of 1 m from the isocenter and exposed it to different amounts of scattered radiation by varying the field size. We identified irradiation of the electrometer to cause a current of approximately −1 pA, regardless of the sign of the biasing voltage. For low‐sensitivity detectors, such a current noticeably distorts relative dose measurements. To demonstrate how the current systematically changes PDDs, we collected measurements with nine ionization chambers of different volumes. As the chamber volume decreased, signal ratios at 20 and 10 cm depth (M20/M10) became smaller for positive bias voltage and larger for negative bias voltage. At the size of the iba CC04 (40 mm³) the difference of M20/M10 was around 1% and for the smallest studied chamber, the iba CC003 chamber (3 mm³), around 7% for a 10 × 10 cm² field. When the electrometer was moved further from the source or shielded, the additional current decreased. Consequently, PDDs at both polarities were brought into alignment at depth even for the 3 mm³ ionization chamber. The apparent polarity effect on PDDs and lateral beam profiles was reduced considerably by shielding the electrometer. Due to normalization the effect on output values was low. When measurements with a low‐sensitivity probe are carried out in conjunction with an internal electrometer, we recommend careful monitoring of the particular setup by testing both polarities, and if deemed necessary, we suggest shielding the electrometer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6236832/ /pubmed/30298980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12458 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Wegener, Sonja
Sauer, Otto A.
Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation
title Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation
title_full Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation
title_fullStr Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation
title_full_unstemmed Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation
title_short Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation
title_sort electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6236832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30298980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12458
work_keys_str_mv AT wegenersonja electrometeroffsetcurrentduetoscatteredradiation
AT sauerottoa electrometeroffsetcurrentduetoscatteredradiation