Cargando…
Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
PURPOSE: To examine the impact of graft thickness (GT) on postoperative visual acuity and endothelial cell density after ultrathin-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus conventional DSAEK. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent DSAEK at our insti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6237014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5924058 |
_version_ | 1783371133155803136 |
---|---|
author | Droutsas, Konstantinos Petrelli, Myrsini Miltsakakis, Dimitrios Andreanos, Konstantinos Karagianni, Anastasia Lazaridis, Apostolos Koutsandrea, Chrysanthi Kymionis, George |
author_facet | Droutsas, Konstantinos Petrelli, Myrsini Miltsakakis, Dimitrios Andreanos, Konstantinos Karagianni, Anastasia Lazaridis, Apostolos Koutsandrea, Chrysanthi Kymionis, George |
author_sort | Droutsas, Konstantinos |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To examine the impact of graft thickness (GT) on postoperative visual acuity and endothelial cell density after ultrathin-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus conventional DSAEK. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent DSAEK at our institute during a 2-year period were reviewed. After excluding subjects with low visual potential, 34 eyes were divided into two groups based on the postoperative GT as measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT): an UT-DSAEK group (GT ≤ 100 μm, n=13 eyes) and a DSAEK group (GT > 100 μm, n=21 eyes). The groups were compared with regard to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), GT, and endothelial cell density (ECD). RESULTS: Preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 1.035 ± 0.514 and 0.772 ± 0.428 for UT-DSAEK and DSAEK, respectively (P=0.072). At 6 months postoperatively, BCVA was 0.088 ± 0.150 following UT-DSAEK and 0.285 ± 0.158 following DSAEK (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: DSAEK grafts with a thickness under 100 μm offered better visual outcomes during the early postoperative period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6237014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62370142018-12-04 Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Droutsas, Konstantinos Petrelli, Myrsini Miltsakakis, Dimitrios Andreanos, Konstantinos Karagianni, Anastasia Lazaridis, Apostolos Koutsandrea, Chrysanthi Kymionis, George J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To examine the impact of graft thickness (GT) on postoperative visual acuity and endothelial cell density after ultrathin-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus conventional DSAEK. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent DSAEK at our institute during a 2-year period were reviewed. After excluding subjects with low visual potential, 34 eyes were divided into two groups based on the postoperative GT as measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT): an UT-DSAEK group (GT ≤ 100 μm, n=13 eyes) and a DSAEK group (GT > 100 μm, n=21 eyes). The groups were compared with regard to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), GT, and endothelial cell density (ECD). RESULTS: Preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 1.035 ± 0.514 and 0.772 ± 0.428 for UT-DSAEK and DSAEK, respectively (P=0.072). At 6 months postoperatively, BCVA was 0.088 ± 0.150 following UT-DSAEK and 0.285 ± 0.158 following DSAEK (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: DSAEK grafts with a thickness under 100 μm offered better visual outcomes during the early postoperative period. Hindawi 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6237014/ /pubmed/30515318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5924058 Text en Copyright © 2018 Konstantinos Droutsas et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Droutsas, Konstantinos Petrelli, Myrsini Miltsakakis, Dimitrios Andreanos, Konstantinos Karagianni, Anastasia Lazaridis, Apostolos Koutsandrea, Chrysanthi Kymionis, George Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty |
title | Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty |
title_full | Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty |
title_fullStr | Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty |
title_short | Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty |
title_sort | visual outcomes of ultrathin-descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6237014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5924058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT droutsaskonstantinos visualoutcomesofultrathindescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplastyversusdescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplasty AT petrellimyrsini visualoutcomesofultrathindescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplastyversusdescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplasty AT miltsakakisdimitrios visualoutcomesofultrathindescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplastyversusdescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplasty AT andreanoskonstantinos visualoutcomesofultrathindescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplastyversusdescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplasty AT karagiannianastasia visualoutcomesofultrathindescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplastyversusdescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplasty AT lazaridisapostolos visualoutcomesofultrathindescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplastyversusdescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplasty AT koutsandreachrysanthi visualoutcomesofultrathindescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplastyversusdescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplasty AT kymionisgeorge visualoutcomesofultrathindescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplastyversusdescemetstrippingendothelialkeratoplasty |