Cargando…

Tumor Volume Reduction After Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Comparison with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Regimens

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) is a novel regimen of induction chemotherapy (IC) for treating locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of GP and TP (paclitaxel plus cisplatin) regimens in tumor volume reduction after IC. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Li, Liao, Wenjun, Xu, Peng, Li, Baisen, Wen, Hao, Zhang, Shichuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6237045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406770
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.909736
_version_ 1783371140514709504
author Zheng, Li
Liao, Wenjun
Xu, Peng
Li, Baisen
Wen, Hao
Zhang, Shichuan
author_facet Zheng, Li
Liao, Wenjun
Xu, Peng
Li, Baisen
Wen, Hao
Zhang, Shichuan
author_sort Zheng, Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) is a novel regimen of induction chemotherapy (IC) for treating locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of GP and TP (paclitaxel plus cisplatin) regimens in tumor volume reduction after IC. MATERIAL/METHODS: Between January 2014 and July 2017, 44 patients with III–IVB stage NPC received GP IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. These patients were matched with 44 patients receiving TP IC according to clinical characteristics. The gross tumor volume of the primary site and positive lymph nodes were delineated by magnetic resonance imaging before and after IC, as well as the nasopharyngeal air cavities. The changes in tumor volume and nasopharyngeal air cavity after IC were calculated and compared between the 2 groups. Treatment toxicities and early survival outcomes were also reported. RESULTS: There were no differences in the initial tumor volume and nasopharyngeal cavity between the 2 groups. The volume changes after IC for the primary site, lymph nodes, and nasopharyngeal cavity were 31.4 (range, −0.97–75.8), 4.68 (range, −7.08–22.06), and 2.62 (range, 0.1–7.63) mL for GP and 23.36 (range, −59.14–83.58), 4.7 (range, −11.21–48.61), and 1.47 (range, −2.47–6.17) mL for TP, respectively. All comparisons favored the GP regimen. The toxicities of the 2 regimens were comparable and no survival differences were observed at follow-up (median, 18.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the tumor volume and nasopharyngeal air cavity showed that the GP regimen was significantly more effective than the TP regimen in tumor burden reduction. However, whether the advantages of GP can translate into survival benefits requires further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6237045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62370452018-12-10 Tumor Volume Reduction After Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Comparison with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Regimens Zheng, Li Liao, Wenjun Xu, Peng Li, Baisen Wen, Hao Zhang, Shichuan Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) is a novel regimen of induction chemotherapy (IC) for treating locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of GP and TP (paclitaxel plus cisplatin) regimens in tumor volume reduction after IC. MATERIAL/METHODS: Between January 2014 and July 2017, 44 patients with III–IVB stage NPC received GP IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. These patients were matched with 44 patients receiving TP IC according to clinical characteristics. The gross tumor volume of the primary site and positive lymph nodes were delineated by magnetic resonance imaging before and after IC, as well as the nasopharyngeal air cavities. The changes in tumor volume and nasopharyngeal air cavity after IC were calculated and compared between the 2 groups. Treatment toxicities and early survival outcomes were also reported. RESULTS: There were no differences in the initial tumor volume and nasopharyngeal cavity between the 2 groups. The volume changes after IC for the primary site, lymph nodes, and nasopharyngeal cavity were 31.4 (range, −0.97–75.8), 4.68 (range, −7.08–22.06), and 2.62 (range, 0.1–7.63) mL for GP and 23.36 (range, −59.14–83.58), 4.7 (range, −11.21–48.61), and 1.47 (range, −2.47–6.17) mL for TP, respectively. All comparisons favored the GP regimen. The toxicities of the 2 regimens were comparable and no survival differences were observed at follow-up (median, 18.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the tumor volume and nasopharyngeal air cavity showed that the GP regimen was significantly more effective than the TP regimen in tumor burden reduction. However, whether the advantages of GP can translate into survival benefits requires further investigation. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6237045/ /pubmed/30406770 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.909736 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Zheng, Li
Liao, Wenjun
Xu, Peng
Li, Baisen
Wen, Hao
Zhang, Shichuan
Tumor Volume Reduction After Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Comparison with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Regimens
title Tumor Volume Reduction After Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Comparison with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Regimens
title_full Tumor Volume Reduction After Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Comparison with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Regimens
title_fullStr Tumor Volume Reduction After Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Comparison with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Regimens
title_full_unstemmed Tumor Volume Reduction After Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Comparison with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Regimens
title_short Tumor Volume Reduction After Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Comparison with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Regimens
title_sort tumor volume reduction after gemcitabine plus cisplatin induction chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: comparison with paclitaxel and cisplatin regimens
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6237045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406770
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.909736
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengli tumorvolumereductionaftergemcitabinepluscisplatininductionchemotherapyinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancercomparisonwithpaclitaxelandcisplatinregimens
AT liaowenjun tumorvolumereductionaftergemcitabinepluscisplatininductionchemotherapyinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancercomparisonwithpaclitaxelandcisplatinregimens
AT xupeng tumorvolumereductionaftergemcitabinepluscisplatininductionchemotherapyinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancercomparisonwithpaclitaxelandcisplatinregimens
AT libaisen tumorvolumereductionaftergemcitabinepluscisplatininductionchemotherapyinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancercomparisonwithpaclitaxelandcisplatinregimens
AT wenhao tumorvolumereductionaftergemcitabinepluscisplatininductionchemotherapyinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancercomparisonwithpaclitaxelandcisplatinregimens
AT zhangshichuan tumorvolumereductionaftergemcitabinepluscisplatininductionchemotherapyinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancercomparisonwithpaclitaxelandcisplatinregimens