Cargando…

Comparative Characterization of Osteoclasts Derived From Murine Bone Marrow Macrophages and RAW 264.7 Cells Using Quantitative Proteomics

Osteoclasts are bone‐resorbing cells differentiated from macrophage/monocyte precursors in response to macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) and receptor activator of NF‐κB ligand (RANKL). In vitro models are principally based on primary bone marrow macrophages (BMMs), but RAW 264.7 cells are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng, Andrew YH, Tu, Chengjian, Shen, Shichen, Xu, Ding, Oursler, Merry J, Qu, Jun, Yang, Shuying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6237207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30460336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10058
_version_ 1783371157728133120
author Ng, Andrew YH
Tu, Chengjian
Shen, Shichen
Xu, Ding
Oursler, Merry J
Qu, Jun
Yang, Shuying
author_facet Ng, Andrew YH
Tu, Chengjian
Shen, Shichen
Xu, Ding
Oursler, Merry J
Qu, Jun
Yang, Shuying
author_sort Ng, Andrew YH
collection PubMed
description Osteoclasts are bone‐resorbing cells differentiated from macrophage/monocyte precursors in response to macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) and receptor activator of NF‐κB ligand (RANKL). In vitro models are principally based on primary bone marrow macrophages (BMMs), but RAW 264.7 cells are frequently used because they are widely available, easy to culture, and more amenable to genetic manipulation than primary cells. Increasing evidence, however, has shown that the vastly different origins of these two cell types may have important effects on cell behavior. In particular, M‐CSF is a prerequisite for the differentiation of BMMs, by promoting survival and proliferation and priming the cells for RANKL induction. RAW 264.7 cells readily form osteoclasts in the presence of RANKL, but M‐CSF is not required. Based on these key differences, we sought to understand their functional implications and how it might affect osteoclast differentiation and related signaling pathways. Using a robust and high‐throughput proteomics strategy, we quantified the global protein changes in osteoclasts derived from BMMs and RAW 264.7 cells at 1, 3, and 5 days of differentiation. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with the identifier PXD009610. Correlation analysis of the proteomes demonstrated low concordance between the two cell types (R(2) ≈ 0.13). Bioinformatics analysis indicate that RANKL‐dependent signaling was intact in RAW 264.7 cells, but biological processes known to be dependent on M‐CSF were significantly different, including cell cycle control, cytoskeletal organization, and apoptosis. RAW 264.7 cells exhibited constitutive activation of Erk and Akt that was dependent on the activity of Abelson tyrosine kinase, and the timing of Erk and Akt activation was significantly different between BMMs and RAW 264.7 cells. Our findings provide the first evidence for major discrepancies between BMMs and RAW 264.7 cells, indicating that careful consideration is needed when using the RAW 264.7 cell line for studying M‐CSF‐dependent signaling and functions. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6237207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62372072018-11-20 Comparative Characterization of Osteoclasts Derived From Murine Bone Marrow Macrophages and RAW 264.7 Cells Using Quantitative Proteomics Ng, Andrew YH Tu, Chengjian Shen, Shichen Xu, Ding Oursler, Merry J Qu, Jun Yang, Shuying JBMR Plus Original Articles Osteoclasts are bone‐resorbing cells differentiated from macrophage/monocyte precursors in response to macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) and receptor activator of NF‐κB ligand (RANKL). In vitro models are principally based on primary bone marrow macrophages (BMMs), but RAW 264.7 cells are frequently used because they are widely available, easy to culture, and more amenable to genetic manipulation than primary cells. Increasing evidence, however, has shown that the vastly different origins of these two cell types may have important effects on cell behavior. In particular, M‐CSF is a prerequisite for the differentiation of BMMs, by promoting survival and proliferation and priming the cells for RANKL induction. RAW 264.7 cells readily form osteoclasts in the presence of RANKL, but M‐CSF is not required. Based on these key differences, we sought to understand their functional implications and how it might affect osteoclast differentiation and related signaling pathways. Using a robust and high‐throughput proteomics strategy, we quantified the global protein changes in osteoclasts derived from BMMs and RAW 264.7 cells at 1, 3, and 5 days of differentiation. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with the identifier PXD009610. Correlation analysis of the proteomes demonstrated low concordance between the two cell types (R(2) ≈ 0.13). Bioinformatics analysis indicate that RANKL‐dependent signaling was intact in RAW 264.7 cells, but biological processes known to be dependent on M‐CSF were significantly different, including cell cycle control, cytoskeletal organization, and apoptosis. RAW 264.7 cells exhibited constitutive activation of Erk and Akt that was dependent on the activity of Abelson tyrosine kinase, and the timing of Erk and Akt activation was significantly different between BMMs and RAW 264.7 cells. Our findings provide the first evidence for major discrepancies between BMMs and RAW 264.7 cells, indicating that careful consideration is needed when using the RAW 264.7 cell line for studying M‐CSF‐dependent signaling and functions. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6237207/ /pubmed/30460336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10058 Text en © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ng, Andrew YH
Tu, Chengjian
Shen, Shichen
Xu, Ding
Oursler, Merry J
Qu, Jun
Yang, Shuying
Comparative Characterization of Osteoclasts Derived From Murine Bone Marrow Macrophages and RAW 264.7 Cells Using Quantitative Proteomics
title Comparative Characterization of Osteoclasts Derived From Murine Bone Marrow Macrophages and RAW 264.7 Cells Using Quantitative Proteomics
title_full Comparative Characterization of Osteoclasts Derived From Murine Bone Marrow Macrophages and RAW 264.7 Cells Using Quantitative Proteomics
title_fullStr Comparative Characterization of Osteoclasts Derived From Murine Bone Marrow Macrophages and RAW 264.7 Cells Using Quantitative Proteomics
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Characterization of Osteoclasts Derived From Murine Bone Marrow Macrophages and RAW 264.7 Cells Using Quantitative Proteomics
title_short Comparative Characterization of Osteoclasts Derived From Murine Bone Marrow Macrophages and RAW 264.7 Cells Using Quantitative Proteomics
title_sort comparative characterization of osteoclasts derived from murine bone marrow macrophages and raw 264.7 cells using quantitative proteomics
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6237207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30460336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10058
work_keys_str_mv AT ngandrewyh comparativecharacterizationofosteoclastsderivedfrommurinebonemarrowmacrophagesandraw2647cellsusingquantitativeproteomics
AT tuchengjian comparativecharacterizationofosteoclastsderivedfrommurinebonemarrowmacrophagesandraw2647cellsusingquantitativeproteomics
AT shenshichen comparativecharacterizationofosteoclastsderivedfrommurinebonemarrowmacrophagesandraw2647cellsusingquantitativeproteomics
AT xuding comparativecharacterizationofosteoclastsderivedfrommurinebonemarrowmacrophagesandraw2647cellsusingquantitativeproteomics
AT ourslermerryj comparativecharacterizationofosteoclastsderivedfrommurinebonemarrowmacrophagesandraw2647cellsusingquantitativeproteomics
AT qujun comparativecharacterizationofosteoclastsderivedfrommurinebonemarrowmacrophagesandraw2647cellsusingquantitativeproteomics
AT yangshuying comparativecharacterizationofosteoclastsderivedfrommurinebonemarrowmacrophagesandraw2647cellsusingquantitativeproteomics