Cargando…

Comparison of Physicochemical Properties between Standard and Sow Pork

This study was conducted to investigate the dressing percentage and physicochemical characteristics, such as fatty acid composition, water holding capacity (WHC), shear force, meat color, cooking loss, and sensory evaluation, of experimental pork obtained from a total of 12 standard pigs and sows. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Gye-Woong, Kim, Hack-Youn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479517
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e45
_version_ 1783371298264580096
author Kim, Gye-Woong
Kim, Hack-Youn
author_facet Kim, Gye-Woong
Kim, Hack-Youn
author_sort Kim, Gye-Woong
collection PubMed
description This study was conducted to investigate the dressing percentage and physicochemical characteristics, such as fatty acid composition, water holding capacity (WHC), shear force, meat color, cooking loss, and sensory evaluation, of experimental pork obtained from a total of 12 standard pigs and sows. The water content of tenderloin (73.38%) was the highest in standard pork (p<0.05). A statistically significant difference in crude protein content was shown between standard pork and sow pork (p<0.05). There were significant differences between standard pork and sow pork in shear forces of loin and tenderloin (p<0.01). There was a significant difference in WHC between standard pork and sow pork in loin, tenderloin, and hind legs (p<0.05). The CIE L* and CIE b* values of standard loin were significantly higher than those of sow loin (p<0.05). The CIE a* values of sow loin were significantly higher than those of standard loin (p<0.05). The contents of arachidonic acid for standard pork and sow pork were 0.33% and 0.84%, respectively (p<0.05). However, there was no difference in the total content of unsaturated fatty acid between the two groups. There were no significant differences between standard pork and sow pork after sensory evaluation, except for color and tenderness. The overall acceptability of standard pork was significantly higher than that of sow pork (p<0.05).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62380342018-11-26 Comparison of Physicochemical Properties between Standard and Sow Pork Kim, Gye-Woong Kim, Hack-Youn Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour Article This study was conducted to investigate the dressing percentage and physicochemical characteristics, such as fatty acid composition, water holding capacity (WHC), shear force, meat color, cooking loss, and sensory evaluation, of experimental pork obtained from a total of 12 standard pigs and sows. The water content of tenderloin (73.38%) was the highest in standard pork (p<0.05). A statistically significant difference in crude protein content was shown between standard pork and sow pork (p<0.05). There were significant differences between standard pork and sow pork in shear forces of loin and tenderloin (p<0.01). There was a significant difference in WHC between standard pork and sow pork in loin, tenderloin, and hind legs (p<0.05). The CIE L* and CIE b* values of standard loin were significantly higher than those of sow loin (p<0.05). The CIE a* values of sow loin were significantly higher than those of standard loin (p<0.05). The contents of arachidonic acid for standard pork and sow pork were 0.33% and 0.84%, respectively (p<0.05). However, there was no difference in the total content of unsaturated fatty acid between the two groups. There were no significant differences between standard pork and sow pork after sensory evaluation, except for color and tenderness. The overall acceptability of standard pork was significantly higher than that of sow pork (p<0.05). Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources 2018-10 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6238034/ /pubmed/30479517 http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e45 Text en © Copyright 2018 Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Gye-Woong
Kim, Hack-Youn
Comparison of Physicochemical Properties between Standard and Sow Pork
title Comparison of Physicochemical Properties between Standard and Sow Pork
title_full Comparison of Physicochemical Properties between Standard and Sow Pork
title_fullStr Comparison of Physicochemical Properties between Standard and Sow Pork
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Physicochemical Properties between Standard and Sow Pork
title_short Comparison of Physicochemical Properties between Standard and Sow Pork
title_sort comparison of physicochemical properties between standard and sow pork
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479517
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e45
work_keys_str_mv AT kimgyewoong comparisonofphysicochemicalpropertiesbetweenstandardandsowpork
AT kimhackyoun comparisonofphysicochemicalpropertiesbetweenstandardandsowpork