Cargando…

A study of the transit amplification divisions during spermatogenesis in Oncopetus fasciatus to assess plasticity in sperm numbers or sperm viability under different diets

Oncopeltus fasciatus males fed the ancestral diet of milkweed seeds prioritize reproduction over lifespan as evidenced by higher rates of fertility and shorter lifespans than males from the same population fed the adapted diet of sunflower seeds. We examined the proximate mechanisms by which milkwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duxbury, Ashley E., Weathersby, Brandie, Sanchez, Zachary, Moore, Patricia J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4511
_version_ 1783371312147726336
author Duxbury, Ashley E.
Weathersby, Brandie
Sanchez, Zachary
Moore, Patricia J.
author_facet Duxbury, Ashley E.
Weathersby, Brandie
Sanchez, Zachary
Moore, Patricia J.
author_sort Duxbury, Ashley E.
collection PubMed
description Oncopeltus fasciatus males fed the ancestral diet of milkweed seeds prioritize reproduction over lifespan as evidenced by higher rates of fertility and shorter lifespans than males from the same population fed the adapted diet of sunflower seeds. We examined the proximate mechanisms by which milkweed‐fed males maintained late‐life fertility. We tested the hypothesis that older milkweed‐fed males maintained fertility by producing more, higher quality sperm. Our results, that older males have more sperm, but their sperm do not have higher viability, are in general agreement with other recent studies on how nutrition affects male fertility in insects. We further examined the mechanisms by which sperm are produced by examining the progression of spermatogonial cells through the cell cycle during the transit amplification divisions. We demonstrated that diet affects the likelihood of a spermatocyst being in the S‐phase or M‐phase of the cell cycle. Given work in model systems, these results have implications for subtle effects on sperm quality either through replication stress or epigenetic markers. Thus, viability may not be the best marker for sperm quality and more work is called for on the mechanisms by which the germline and the production of sperm mediate the cost of reproduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62381242018-11-21 A study of the transit amplification divisions during spermatogenesis in Oncopetus fasciatus to assess plasticity in sperm numbers or sperm viability under different diets Duxbury, Ashley E. Weathersby, Brandie Sanchez, Zachary Moore, Patricia J. Ecol Evol Original Research Oncopeltus fasciatus males fed the ancestral diet of milkweed seeds prioritize reproduction over lifespan as evidenced by higher rates of fertility and shorter lifespans than males from the same population fed the adapted diet of sunflower seeds. We examined the proximate mechanisms by which milkweed‐fed males maintained late‐life fertility. We tested the hypothesis that older milkweed‐fed males maintained fertility by producing more, higher quality sperm. Our results, that older males have more sperm, but their sperm do not have higher viability, are in general agreement with other recent studies on how nutrition affects male fertility in insects. We further examined the mechanisms by which sperm are produced by examining the progression of spermatogonial cells through the cell cycle during the transit amplification divisions. We demonstrated that diet affects the likelihood of a spermatocyst being in the S‐phase or M‐phase of the cell cycle. Given work in model systems, these results have implications for subtle effects on sperm quality either through replication stress or epigenetic markers. Thus, viability may not be the best marker for sperm quality and more work is called for on the mechanisms by which the germline and the production of sperm mediate the cost of reproduction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6238124/ /pubmed/30464818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4511 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Duxbury, Ashley E.
Weathersby, Brandie
Sanchez, Zachary
Moore, Patricia J.
A study of the transit amplification divisions during spermatogenesis in Oncopetus fasciatus to assess plasticity in sperm numbers or sperm viability under different diets
title A study of the transit amplification divisions during spermatogenesis in Oncopetus fasciatus to assess plasticity in sperm numbers or sperm viability under different diets
title_full A study of the transit amplification divisions during spermatogenesis in Oncopetus fasciatus to assess plasticity in sperm numbers or sperm viability under different diets
title_fullStr A study of the transit amplification divisions during spermatogenesis in Oncopetus fasciatus to assess plasticity in sperm numbers or sperm viability under different diets
title_full_unstemmed A study of the transit amplification divisions during spermatogenesis in Oncopetus fasciatus to assess plasticity in sperm numbers or sperm viability under different diets
title_short A study of the transit amplification divisions during spermatogenesis in Oncopetus fasciatus to assess plasticity in sperm numbers or sperm viability under different diets
title_sort study of the transit amplification divisions during spermatogenesis in oncopetus fasciatus to assess plasticity in sperm numbers or sperm viability under different diets
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4511
work_keys_str_mv AT duxburyashleye astudyofthetransitamplificationdivisionsduringspermatogenesisinoncopetusfasciatustoassessplasticityinspermnumbersorspermviabilityunderdifferentdiets
AT weathersbybrandie astudyofthetransitamplificationdivisionsduringspermatogenesisinoncopetusfasciatustoassessplasticityinspermnumbersorspermviabilityunderdifferentdiets
AT sanchezzachary astudyofthetransitamplificationdivisionsduringspermatogenesisinoncopetusfasciatustoassessplasticityinspermnumbersorspermviabilityunderdifferentdiets
AT moorepatriciaj astudyofthetransitamplificationdivisionsduringspermatogenesisinoncopetusfasciatustoassessplasticityinspermnumbersorspermviabilityunderdifferentdiets
AT duxburyashleye studyofthetransitamplificationdivisionsduringspermatogenesisinoncopetusfasciatustoassessplasticityinspermnumbersorspermviabilityunderdifferentdiets
AT weathersbybrandie studyofthetransitamplificationdivisionsduringspermatogenesisinoncopetusfasciatustoassessplasticityinspermnumbersorspermviabilityunderdifferentdiets
AT sanchezzachary studyofthetransitamplificationdivisionsduringspermatogenesisinoncopetusfasciatustoassessplasticityinspermnumbersorspermviabilityunderdifferentdiets
AT moorepatriciaj studyofthetransitamplificationdivisionsduringspermatogenesisinoncopetusfasciatustoassessplasticityinspermnumbersorspermviabilityunderdifferentdiets