Cargando…

Sensory deficiencies affect resource selection and associational effects at two spatial scales

Many insect species have limited sensory abilities and may not be able to perceive the quality of different resource types while approaching patchily distributed resources. These restrictions may lead to differences in selection rates between separate patches and between different resource types wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verschut, Thomas A., Inouye, Brian D., Hambäck, Peter A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4534
_version_ 1783371313338908672
author Verschut, Thomas A.
Inouye, Brian D.
Hambäck, Peter A.
author_facet Verschut, Thomas A.
Inouye, Brian D.
Hambäck, Peter A.
author_sort Verschut, Thomas A.
collection PubMed
description Many insect species have limited sensory abilities and may not be able to perceive the quality of different resource types while approaching patchily distributed resources. These restrictions may lead to differences in selection rates between separate patches and between different resource types within a patch, which may have consequences for associational effects between resources. In this study, we used an oviposition assay containing different frequencies of apple and banana substrates divided over two patches to compare resource selection rates of wild‐type Drosophila melanogaster at the between‐ and within‐patch scales. Next, we compared the wild‐type behavior with that of the olfactory‐deficient strain Orco (2) and the gustatory‐deficient strain Poxn (ΔM22‐B5) and found comparable responses to patch heterogeneity and similarly strong selection rates for apple at both scales for the wild‐type and olfactory‐deficient flies. Their oviposition behavior translated into associational susceptibility for apple and associational resistance for banana. The gustatory‐deficient flies, on the other hand, no longer had a strong selection rate for apple, strongly differed in between‐ and within‐patch selection rates from the wild‐type flies, and caused no associational effects between the resources. Our study suggests that differences in sensory capabilities can affect resource selection at different search behavior scales in different ways and in turn underlie associational effects between resources at different spatial scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62381292018-11-21 Sensory deficiencies affect resource selection and associational effects at two spatial scales Verschut, Thomas A. Inouye, Brian D. Hambäck, Peter A. Ecol Evol Original Research Many insect species have limited sensory abilities and may not be able to perceive the quality of different resource types while approaching patchily distributed resources. These restrictions may lead to differences in selection rates between separate patches and between different resource types within a patch, which may have consequences for associational effects between resources. In this study, we used an oviposition assay containing different frequencies of apple and banana substrates divided over two patches to compare resource selection rates of wild‐type Drosophila melanogaster at the between‐ and within‐patch scales. Next, we compared the wild‐type behavior with that of the olfactory‐deficient strain Orco (2) and the gustatory‐deficient strain Poxn (ΔM22‐B5) and found comparable responses to patch heterogeneity and similarly strong selection rates for apple at both scales for the wild‐type and olfactory‐deficient flies. Their oviposition behavior translated into associational susceptibility for apple and associational resistance for banana. The gustatory‐deficient flies, on the other hand, no longer had a strong selection rate for apple, strongly differed in between‐ and within‐patch selection rates from the wild‐type flies, and caused no associational effects between the resources. Our study suggests that differences in sensory capabilities can affect resource selection at different search behavior scales in different ways and in turn underlie associational effects between resources at different spatial scales. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6238129/ /pubmed/30464828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4534 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Verschut, Thomas A.
Inouye, Brian D.
Hambäck, Peter A.
Sensory deficiencies affect resource selection and associational effects at two spatial scales
title Sensory deficiencies affect resource selection and associational effects at two spatial scales
title_full Sensory deficiencies affect resource selection and associational effects at two spatial scales
title_fullStr Sensory deficiencies affect resource selection and associational effects at two spatial scales
title_full_unstemmed Sensory deficiencies affect resource selection and associational effects at two spatial scales
title_short Sensory deficiencies affect resource selection and associational effects at two spatial scales
title_sort sensory deficiencies affect resource selection and associational effects at two spatial scales
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4534
work_keys_str_mv AT verschutthomasa sensorydeficienciesaffectresourceselectionandassociationaleffectsattwospatialscales
AT inouyebriand sensorydeficienciesaffectresourceselectionandassociationaleffectsattwospatialscales
AT hambackpetera sensorydeficienciesaffectresourceselectionandassociationaleffectsattwospatialscales