Cargando…
Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria
Objectives This study is to examine the association between different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse birth outcomes. Study Design A retrospective cohort study of 5,937 women with a singleton pregnancy was conducted, who completed GDM screening between 24 to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30450267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675343 |
_version_ | 1783371327230443520 |
---|---|
author | Davis, Esa M. Scifres, Christina M. Abebe, Kaleab Costacou, Tina Comer, Diane Catalano, Patrick Simhan, Hyagriv Freiberg, Matthew Day, Nancy |
author_facet | Davis, Esa M. Scifres, Christina M. Abebe, Kaleab Costacou, Tina Comer, Diane Catalano, Patrick Simhan, Hyagriv Freiberg, Matthew Day, Nancy |
author_sort | Davis, Esa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives This study is to examine the association between different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse birth outcomes. Study Design A retrospective cohort study of 5,937 women with a singleton pregnancy was conducted, who completed GDM screening between 24 to 32 weeks gestational age. Four nonoverlapping groups of women defined as: 1) Normal: glucose challenge test (GCT) <130 mg/dL, 2) elevated GCT + normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT): abnormal 1 hour GCT + normal 3 hour OGTT, 3) GDM/International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG): abnormal 3 hour OGTT by the IADPSG criteria, and 4) GDM/Carpenter-Coustan (CC): diagnosis per CC criteria. We used logistic regression to examine the association between GDM group classification and main outcome of macrosomia and secondary birth outcomes. Results Prevalences were GDM/CC 4.6%, GDM/IADPSG 3.0, and 7.6% overall. GDM/IADPSG group was associated with increased macrosomia (adj OR [odd ratio] 1.87; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.08–3.25; p = 0.02), while GDM/CC group was associated with increased preterm birth (adj OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.05–2.80; p = 0.03). Conclusion Little difference in birth outcomes was found between the two criteria, GDM/CC and GDM/IADPSG. Randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the risks and benefits of these screening paradigms before their incorporation into clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6238203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62382032018-11-16 Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria Davis, Esa M. Scifres, Christina M. Abebe, Kaleab Costacou, Tina Comer, Diane Catalano, Patrick Simhan, Hyagriv Freiberg, Matthew Day, Nancy AJP Rep Objectives This study is to examine the association between different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse birth outcomes. Study Design A retrospective cohort study of 5,937 women with a singleton pregnancy was conducted, who completed GDM screening between 24 to 32 weeks gestational age. Four nonoverlapping groups of women defined as: 1) Normal: glucose challenge test (GCT) <130 mg/dL, 2) elevated GCT + normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT): abnormal 1 hour GCT + normal 3 hour OGTT, 3) GDM/International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG): abnormal 3 hour OGTT by the IADPSG criteria, and 4) GDM/Carpenter-Coustan (CC): diagnosis per CC criteria. We used logistic regression to examine the association between GDM group classification and main outcome of macrosomia and secondary birth outcomes. Results Prevalences were GDM/CC 4.6%, GDM/IADPSG 3.0, and 7.6% overall. GDM/IADPSG group was associated with increased macrosomia (adj OR [odd ratio] 1.87; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.08–3.25; p = 0.02), while GDM/CC group was associated with increased preterm birth (adj OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.05–2.80; p = 0.03). Conclusion Little difference in birth outcomes was found between the two criteria, GDM/CC and GDM/IADPSG. Randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the risks and benefits of these screening paradigms before their incorporation into clinical practice. Thieme Medical Publishers 2018-10 2018-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6238203/ /pubmed/30450267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675343 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Davis, Esa M. Scifres, Christina M. Abebe, Kaleab Costacou, Tina Comer, Diane Catalano, Patrick Simhan, Hyagriv Freiberg, Matthew Day, Nancy Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria |
title | Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria |
title_full | Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria |
title_short | Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria |
title_sort | comparison of birth outcomes by gestational diabetes screening criteria |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30450267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davisesam comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria AT scifreschristinam comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria AT abebekaleab comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria AT costacoutina comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria AT comerdiane comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria AT catalanopatrick comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria AT simhanhyagriv comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria AT freibergmatthew comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria AT daynancy comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria |