Cargando…

Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria

Objectives  This study is to examine the association between different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse birth outcomes. Study Design  A retrospective cohort study of 5,937 women with a singleton pregnancy was conducted, who completed GDM screening between 24 to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Esa M., Scifres, Christina M., Abebe, Kaleab, Costacou, Tina, Comer, Diane, Catalano, Patrick, Simhan, Hyagriv, Freiberg, Matthew, Day, Nancy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30450267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675343
_version_ 1783371327230443520
author Davis, Esa M.
Scifres, Christina M.
Abebe, Kaleab
Costacou, Tina
Comer, Diane
Catalano, Patrick
Simhan, Hyagriv
Freiberg, Matthew
Day, Nancy
author_facet Davis, Esa M.
Scifres, Christina M.
Abebe, Kaleab
Costacou, Tina
Comer, Diane
Catalano, Patrick
Simhan, Hyagriv
Freiberg, Matthew
Day, Nancy
author_sort Davis, Esa M.
collection PubMed
description Objectives  This study is to examine the association between different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse birth outcomes. Study Design  A retrospective cohort study of 5,937 women with a singleton pregnancy was conducted, who completed GDM screening between 24 to 32 weeks gestational age. Four nonoverlapping groups of women defined as: 1) Normal: glucose challenge test (GCT) <130 mg/dL, 2) elevated GCT + normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT): abnormal 1 hour GCT + normal 3 hour OGTT, 3) GDM/International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG): abnormal 3 hour OGTT by the IADPSG criteria, and 4) GDM/Carpenter-Coustan (CC): diagnosis per CC criteria. We used logistic regression to examine the association between GDM group classification and main outcome of macrosomia and secondary birth outcomes. Results  Prevalences were GDM/CC 4.6%, GDM/IADPSG 3.0, and 7.6% overall. GDM/IADPSG group was associated with increased macrosomia (adj OR [odd ratio] 1.87; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.08–3.25; p  = 0.02), while GDM/CC group was associated with increased preterm birth (adj OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.05–2.80; p  = 0.03). Conclusion  Little difference in birth outcomes was found between the two criteria, GDM/CC and GDM/IADPSG. Randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the risks and benefits of these screening paradigms before their incorporation into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62382032018-11-16 Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria Davis, Esa M. Scifres, Christina M. Abebe, Kaleab Costacou, Tina Comer, Diane Catalano, Patrick Simhan, Hyagriv Freiberg, Matthew Day, Nancy AJP Rep Objectives  This study is to examine the association between different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse birth outcomes. Study Design  A retrospective cohort study of 5,937 women with a singleton pregnancy was conducted, who completed GDM screening between 24 to 32 weeks gestational age. Four nonoverlapping groups of women defined as: 1) Normal: glucose challenge test (GCT) <130 mg/dL, 2) elevated GCT + normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT): abnormal 1 hour GCT + normal 3 hour OGTT, 3) GDM/International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG): abnormal 3 hour OGTT by the IADPSG criteria, and 4) GDM/Carpenter-Coustan (CC): diagnosis per CC criteria. We used logistic regression to examine the association between GDM group classification and main outcome of macrosomia and secondary birth outcomes. Results  Prevalences were GDM/CC 4.6%, GDM/IADPSG 3.0, and 7.6% overall. GDM/IADPSG group was associated with increased macrosomia (adj OR [odd ratio] 1.87; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.08–3.25; p  = 0.02), while GDM/CC group was associated with increased preterm birth (adj OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.05–2.80; p  = 0.03). Conclusion  Little difference in birth outcomes was found between the two criteria, GDM/CC and GDM/IADPSG. Randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the risks and benefits of these screening paradigms before their incorporation into clinical practice. Thieme Medical Publishers 2018-10 2018-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6238203/ /pubmed/30450267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675343 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Davis, Esa M.
Scifres, Christina M.
Abebe, Kaleab
Costacou, Tina
Comer, Diane
Catalano, Patrick
Simhan, Hyagriv
Freiberg, Matthew
Day, Nancy
Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria
title Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria
title_full Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria
title_fullStr Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria
title_short Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria
title_sort comparison of birth outcomes by gestational diabetes screening criteria
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30450267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675343
work_keys_str_mv AT davisesam comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria
AT scifreschristinam comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria
AT abebekaleab comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria
AT costacoutina comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria
AT comerdiane comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria
AT catalanopatrick comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria
AT simhanhyagriv comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria
AT freibergmatthew comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria
AT daynancy comparisonofbirthoutcomesbygestationaldiabetesscreeningcriteria