Cargando…

Re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi: A comparison of three rotavirus vaccines

INTRODUCTION: Diarrhea is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and rotavirus accounts for many of these deaths. As of August 2018, 96 countries have introduced rotavirus vaccines into their immunization programs. Two rotavirus vaccines, Rotarix® and RotaTeq®, have been WHO-prequalified since 2009,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pecenka, Clint, Debellut, Frederic, Bar-Zeev, Naor, Anwari, Palwasha, Nonvignon, Justice, Shamsuzzaman, Md, Clark, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.068
_version_ 1783371327713837056
author Pecenka, Clint
Debellut, Frederic
Bar-Zeev, Naor
Anwari, Palwasha
Nonvignon, Justice
Shamsuzzaman, Md
Clark, Andrew
author_facet Pecenka, Clint
Debellut, Frederic
Bar-Zeev, Naor
Anwari, Palwasha
Nonvignon, Justice
Shamsuzzaman, Md
Clark, Andrew
author_sort Pecenka, Clint
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Diarrhea is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and rotavirus accounts for many of these deaths. As of August 2018, 96 countries have introduced rotavirus vaccines into their immunization programs. Two rotavirus vaccines, Rotarix® and RotaTeq®, have been WHO-prequalified since 2009, with Rotarix® being the preferred product of most Gavi-supported countries. ROTAVAC® and ROTASIIL® have both been prequalified recently. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reevaluated the costs and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi and compared Rotarix®, ROTAVAC®, and ROTASIIL® in each country. For consistency with previously published analyses in these countries, we used the same Excel-based cohort model and much of the same data as the original analyses. We varied the expected price (with and without Gavi subsidy), wastage, and incremental health system costs associated with each vaccine. We assumed the same efficacy and waning assumptions following administration of two or three doses for the respective product. RESULTS: The discounted cost per DALY averted compared to no vaccination ranged from 0.3 to 1.3 times GNI per capita for each vaccine. With the Gavi subsidy, the average cost-effectiveness ratios were below 0.3 times GNI per capita in all three countries. Though critical empirical cost data are not yet available, Rotarix® is the least costly and most cost-effective product in the countries examined in this modelling study. However, small decreases in the incremental health system cost for other products could result in cost and cost-effectiveness outcomes that match or surpass those of Rotarix®. CONCLUSION: Countries may wish to consider new rotavirus vaccines entering the market. Countries should carefully examine multiple product attributes including price and the incremental health system costs associated with each vaccine. These costs will vary by country and may be a defining factor in determining the least costly and most cost-effective product for the population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62382052018-11-26 Re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi: A comparison of three rotavirus vaccines Pecenka, Clint Debellut, Frederic Bar-Zeev, Naor Anwari, Palwasha Nonvignon, Justice Shamsuzzaman, Md Clark, Andrew Vaccine Article INTRODUCTION: Diarrhea is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and rotavirus accounts for many of these deaths. As of August 2018, 96 countries have introduced rotavirus vaccines into their immunization programs. Two rotavirus vaccines, Rotarix® and RotaTeq®, have been WHO-prequalified since 2009, with Rotarix® being the preferred product of most Gavi-supported countries. ROTAVAC® and ROTASIIL® have both been prequalified recently. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reevaluated the costs and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi and compared Rotarix®, ROTAVAC®, and ROTASIIL® in each country. For consistency with previously published analyses in these countries, we used the same Excel-based cohort model and much of the same data as the original analyses. We varied the expected price (with and without Gavi subsidy), wastage, and incremental health system costs associated with each vaccine. We assumed the same efficacy and waning assumptions following administration of two or three doses for the respective product. RESULTS: The discounted cost per DALY averted compared to no vaccination ranged from 0.3 to 1.3 times GNI per capita for each vaccine. With the Gavi subsidy, the average cost-effectiveness ratios were below 0.3 times GNI per capita in all three countries. Though critical empirical cost data are not yet available, Rotarix® is the least costly and most cost-effective product in the countries examined in this modelling study. However, small decreases in the incremental health system cost for other products could result in cost and cost-effectiveness outcomes that match or surpass those of Rotarix®. CONCLUSION: Countries may wish to consider new rotavirus vaccines entering the market. Countries should carefully examine multiple product attributes including price and the incremental health system costs associated with each vaccine. These costs will vary by country and may be a defining factor in determining the least costly and most cost-effective product for the population. Elsevier Science 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6238205/ /pubmed/30420039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.068 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pecenka, Clint
Debellut, Frederic
Bar-Zeev, Naor
Anwari, Palwasha
Nonvignon, Justice
Shamsuzzaman, Md
Clark, Andrew
Re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi: A comparison of three rotavirus vaccines
title Re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi: A comparison of three rotavirus vaccines
title_full Re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi: A comparison of three rotavirus vaccines
title_fullStr Re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi: A comparison of three rotavirus vaccines
title_full_unstemmed Re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi: A comparison of three rotavirus vaccines
title_short Re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi: A comparison of three rotavirus vaccines
title_sort re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in bangladesh, ghana, and malawi: a comparison of three rotavirus vaccines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.068
work_keys_str_mv AT pecenkaclint reevaluatingthecostandcosteffectivenessofrotavirusvaccinationinbangladeshghanaandmalawiacomparisonofthreerotavirusvaccines
AT debellutfrederic reevaluatingthecostandcosteffectivenessofrotavirusvaccinationinbangladeshghanaandmalawiacomparisonofthreerotavirusvaccines
AT barzeevnaor reevaluatingthecostandcosteffectivenessofrotavirusvaccinationinbangladeshghanaandmalawiacomparisonofthreerotavirusvaccines
AT anwaripalwasha reevaluatingthecostandcosteffectivenessofrotavirusvaccinationinbangladeshghanaandmalawiacomparisonofthreerotavirusvaccines
AT nonvignonjustice reevaluatingthecostandcosteffectivenessofrotavirusvaccinationinbangladeshghanaandmalawiacomparisonofthreerotavirusvaccines
AT shamsuzzamanmd reevaluatingthecostandcosteffectivenessofrotavirusvaccinationinbangladeshghanaandmalawiacomparisonofthreerotavirusvaccines
AT clarkandrew reevaluatingthecostandcosteffectivenessofrotavirusvaccinationinbangladeshghanaandmalawiacomparisonofthreerotavirusvaccines