Cargando…

Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND: With the advent of bacterial resistance, it is important now more than ever to evaluate use of antibiotic chemoprophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery. Within this area of the body there may be less dissection, surgery time with smaller incisions and importantly smaller sizes of implanted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Modha, Mr Ravi Krishān, Morriss-Roberts, Chris, Smither, Madeleine, Larholt, Jonathan, Reilly, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0303-0
_version_ 1783371357042507776
author Modha, Mr Ravi Krishān
Morriss-Roberts, Chris
Smither, Madeleine
Larholt, Jonathan
Reilly, Ian
author_facet Modha, Mr Ravi Krishān
Morriss-Roberts, Chris
Smither, Madeleine
Larholt, Jonathan
Reilly, Ian
author_sort Modha, Mr Ravi Krishān
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the advent of bacterial resistance, it is important now more than ever to evaluate use of antibiotic chemoprophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery. Within this area of the body there may be less dissection, surgery time with smaller incisions and importantly smaller sizes of implanted fixation as compared to other bone and joint procedures. Our objective was to systematically evaluate the quality of evidence behind existing guidelines. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature search was performed: MEDLINE, CINHAL, EMBASE and the Cochrane library from 1990 up to March 2018. To avoid omitting any studies on the subject, Google Scholar was also used. The inclusion criterion were studies exploring perioperative antibiotic use, postoperative infection rates in elective foot and ankle surgery and studies associated with this subject evaluating antibiotic use in clean elective foot and ankle surgery. The exclusion criterion being studies upon contaminated or dirty surgery or those which were inclusive of procedures proximal to the foot and ankle. RESULTS: Overall 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the grading of evidence, 2 level one and 4 level two studies were recognised. These studies ranked relatively highly in comparison to 5 studies that were graded as level three and level four tiers of evidence. Results of SSI rates found within this systematic review ranged from 0% to 9.4% of overall postoperative infections encountered after foot and ankle surgery in the studies analysed. CONCLUSION: Whilst fragmented, aspects of antibiotic chemoprophylaxis are established fields in elective surgery with a growing body of evidence. Evidence for antibiotic use however, specifically within elective foot and ankle surgery, is lacking. This systematic review is a seminal paper which delivers an impression of the most influential literature within the field of foot and ankle surgery, with the aim being to entice conclusions and guide future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62383412018-11-26 Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature Modha, Mr Ravi Krishān Morriss-Roberts, Chris Smither, Madeleine Larholt, Jonathan Reilly, Ian J Foot Ankle Res Review BACKGROUND: With the advent of bacterial resistance, it is important now more than ever to evaluate use of antibiotic chemoprophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery. Within this area of the body there may be less dissection, surgery time with smaller incisions and importantly smaller sizes of implanted fixation as compared to other bone and joint procedures. Our objective was to systematically evaluate the quality of evidence behind existing guidelines. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature search was performed: MEDLINE, CINHAL, EMBASE and the Cochrane library from 1990 up to March 2018. To avoid omitting any studies on the subject, Google Scholar was also used. The inclusion criterion were studies exploring perioperative antibiotic use, postoperative infection rates in elective foot and ankle surgery and studies associated with this subject evaluating antibiotic use in clean elective foot and ankle surgery. The exclusion criterion being studies upon contaminated or dirty surgery or those which were inclusive of procedures proximal to the foot and ankle. RESULTS: Overall 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the grading of evidence, 2 level one and 4 level two studies were recognised. These studies ranked relatively highly in comparison to 5 studies that were graded as level three and level four tiers of evidence. Results of SSI rates found within this systematic review ranged from 0% to 9.4% of overall postoperative infections encountered after foot and ankle surgery in the studies analysed. CONCLUSION: Whilst fragmented, aspects of antibiotic chemoprophylaxis are established fields in elective surgery with a growing body of evidence. Evidence for antibiotic use however, specifically within elective foot and ankle surgery, is lacking. This systematic review is a seminal paper which delivers an impression of the most influential literature within the field of foot and ankle surgery, with the aim being to entice conclusions and guide future research. BioMed Central 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6238341/ /pubmed/30479666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0303-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Modha, Mr Ravi Krishān
Morriss-Roberts, Chris
Smither, Madeleine
Larholt, Jonathan
Reilly, Ian
Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature
title Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0303-0
work_keys_str_mv AT modhamrravikrishan antibioticprophylaxisinfootandanklesurgeryasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT morrissrobertschris antibioticprophylaxisinfootandanklesurgeryasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT smithermadeleine antibioticprophylaxisinfootandanklesurgeryasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT larholtjonathan antibioticprophylaxisinfootandanklesurgeryasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT reillyian antibioticprophylaxisinfootandanklesurgeryasystematicreviewoftheliterature