Cargando…
Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology
BACKGROUND: As increasing numbers of dengue vaccines and therapeutics are in clinical development, standardized consensus clinical endpoint definitions are urgently needed to assess the efficacy of different interventions with respect to disease severity. We aimed to convene dengue experts represent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0601-z |
_version_ | 1783371357909680128 |
---|---|
author | Jaenisch, Thomas Hendrickx, Kim Erpicum, Martin Agulto, Liane Tomashek, Kay M. Dempsey, Walla Siqueira, João Bosco Marks, Morgan A. Fay, Michael P. Laughlin, Catherine L’Azou, Maina Leo, Yee-Sin Narvaez, Federico Teyssou, Remy Thomas, Stephen J. Tissera, Hasitha Wallace, Derek Wilder-Smith, Annelies Gubler, Duane J. Cassetti, M. Cristina |
author_facet | Jaenisch, Thomas Hendrickx, Kim Erpicum, Martin Agulto, Liane Tomashek, Kay M. Dempsey, Walla Siqueira, João Bosco Marks, Morgan A. Fay, Michael P. Laughlin, Catherine L’Azou, Maina Leo, Yee-Sin Narvaez, Federico Teyssou, Remy Thomas, Stephen J. Tissera, Hasitha Wallace, Derek Wilder-Smith, Annelies Gubler, Duane J. Cassetti, M. Cristina |
author_sort | Jaenisch, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As increasing numbers of dengue vaccines and therapeutics are in clinical development, standardized consensus clinical endpoint definitions are urgently needed to assess the efficacy of different interventions with respect to disease severity. We aimed to convene dengue experts representing various sectors and dengue endemic areas to review the literature and propose clinical endpoint definitions for moderate and severe disease based on the framework provided by the WHO 2009 classification. METHODS: The endpoints were first proposed and discussed in a structured expert consultation. After that, the Delphi method was carried out to assess the usefulness, validity and feasibility of the standardized clinical disease endpoints for interventional dengue research. RESULTS: Most respondents (> 80%) agreed there is a need for both standardized clinical endpoints and operationalization of severe endpoints. Most respondents (67%) felt there is utility for moderate severity endpoints, but cited challenges in their development. Hospitalization as a moderate endpoint of disease severity or measure of public health impact was deemed to be useful by only 47% of respondents, but 89% felt it could bring about supplemental information if carefully contextualized according to data collection setting. Over half of the respondents favored alignment of the standard endpoints with the WHO guidelines (58%), but cautioned that the endpoints could have ramifications for public health practice. In terms of data granularity of the endpoints, there was a slight preference for a categorical vs numeric system (e.g. 1–10) (47% vs 34%), and 74% of respondents suggested validating the endpoints using large prospective data sets. CONCLUSION: The structured consensus-building process was successful taking into account the history of the debate around potential endpoints for severe dengue. There is clear support for the development of standardized endpoints for interventional clinical research and the need for subsequent validation with prospective data sets. Challenges include the complexity of developing moderate disease research endpoints for dengue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6238344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62383442018-11-26 Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology Jaenisch, Thomas Hendrickx, Kim Erpicum, Martin Agulto, Liane Tomashek, Kay M. Dempsey, Walla Siqueira, João Bosco Marks, Morgan A. Fay, Michael P. Laughlin, Catherine L’Azou, Maina Leo, Yee-Sin Narvaez, Federico Teyssou, Remy Thomas, Stephen J. Tissera, Hasitha Wallace, Derek Wilder-Smith, Annelies Gubler, Duane J. Cassetti, M. Cristina BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: As increasing numbers of dengue vaccines and therapeutics are in clinical development, standardized consensus clinical endpoint definitions are urgently needed to assess the efficacy of different interventions with respect to disease severity. We aimed to convene dengue experts representing various sectors and dengue endemic areas to review the literature and propose clinical endpoint definitions for moderate and severe disease based on the framework provided by the WHO 2009 classification. METHODS: The endpoints were first proposed and discussed in a structured expert consultation. After that, the Delphi method was carried out to assess the usefulness, validity and feasibility of the standardized clinical disease endpoints for interventional dengue research. RESULTS: Most respondents (> 80%) agreed there is a need for both standardized clinical endpoints and operationalization of severe endpoints. Most respondents (67%) felt there is utility for moderate severity endpoints, but cited challenges in their development. Hospitalization as a moderate endpoint of disease severity or measure of public health impact was deemed to be useful by only 47% of respondents, but 89% felt it could bring about supplemental information if carefully contextualized according to data collection setting. Over half of the respondents favored alignment of the standard endpoints with the WHO guidelines (58%), but cautioned that the endpoints could have ramifications for public health practice. In terms of data granularity of the endpoints, there was a slight preference for a categorical vs numeric system (e.g. 1–10) (47% vs 34%), and 74% of respondents suggested validating the endpoints using large prospective data sets. CONCLUSION: The structured consensus-building process was successful taking into account the history of the debate around potential endpoints for severe dengue. There is clear support for the development of standardized endpoints for interventional clinical research and the need for subsequent validation with prospective data sets. Challenges include the complexity of developing moderate disease research endpoints for dengue. BioMed Central 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6238344/ /pubmed/30442099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0601-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jaenisch, Thomas Hendrickx, Kim Erpicum, Martin Agulto, Liane Tomashek, Kay M. Dempsey, Walla Siqueira, João Bosco Marks, Morgan A. Fay, Michael P. Laughlin, Catherine L’Azou, Maina Leo, Yee-Sin Narvaez, Federico Teyssou, Remy Thomas, Stephen J. Tissera, Hasitha Wallace, Derek Wilder-Smith, Annelies Gubler, Duane J. Cassetti, M. Cristina Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology |
title | Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology |
title_full | Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology |
title_fullStr | Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology |
title_short | Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology |
title_sort | development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0601-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaenischthomas developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT hendrickxkim developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT erpicummartin developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT agultoliane developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT tomashekkaym developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT dempseywalla developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT siqueirajoaobosco developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT marksmorgana developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT faymichaelp developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT laughlincatherine developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT lazoumaina developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT leoyeesin developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT narvaezfederico developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT teyssouremy developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT thomasstephenj developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT tisserahasitha developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT wallacederek developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT wildersmithannelies developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT gublerduanej developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology AT cassettimcristina developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology |