Cargando…

Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology

BACKGROUND: As increasing numbers of dengue vaccines and therapeutics are in clinical development, standardized consensus clinical endpoint definitions are urgently needed to assess the efficacy of different interventions with respect to disease severity. We aimed to convene dengue experts represent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaenisch, Thomas, Hendrickx, Kim, Erpicum, Martin, Agulto, Liane, Tomashek, Kay M., Dempsey, Walla, Siqueira, João Bosco, Marks, Morgan A., Fay, Michael P., Laughlin, Catherine, L’Azou, Maina, Leo, Yee-Sin, Narvaez, Federico, Teyssou, Remy, Thomas, Stephen J., Tissera, Hasitha, Wallace, Derek, Wilder-Smith, Annelies, Gubler, Duane J., Cassetti, M. Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0601-z
_version_ 1783371357909680128
author Jaenisch, Thomas
Hendrickx, Kim
Erpicum, Martin
Agulto, Liane
Tomashek, Kay M.
Dempsey, Walla
Siqueira, João Bosco
Marks, Morgan A.
Fay, Michael P.
Laughlin, Catherine
L’Azou, Maina
Leo, Yee-Sin
Narvaez, Federico
Teyssou, Remy
Thomas, Stephen J.
Tissera, Hasitha
Wallace, Derek
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Gubler, Duane J.
Cassetti, M. Cristina
author_facet Jaenisch, Thomas
Hendrickx, Kim
Erpicum, Martin
Agulto, Liane
Tomashek, Kay M.
Dempsey, Walla
Siqueira, João Bosco
Marks, Morgan A.
Fay, Michael P.
Laughlin, Catherine
L’Azou, Maina
Leo, Yee-Sin
Narvaez, Federico
Teyssou, Remy
Thomas, Stephen J.
Tissera, Hasitha
Wallace, Derek
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Gubler, Duane J.
Cassetti, M. Cristina
author_sort Jaenisch, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As increasing numbers of dengue vaccines and therapeutics are in clinical development, standardized consensus clinical endpoint definitions are urgently needed to assess the efficacy of different interventions with respect to disease severity. We aimed to convene dengue experts representing various sectors and dengue endemic areas to review the literature and propose clinical endpoint definitions for moderate and severe disease based on the framework provided by the WHO 2009 classification. METHODS: The endpoints were first proposed and discussed in a structured expert consultation. After that, the Delphi method was carried out to assess the usefulness, validity and feasibility of the standardized clinical disease endpoints for interventional dengue research. RESULTS: Most respondents (> 80%) agreed there is a need for both standardized clinical endpoints and operationalization of severe endpoints. Most respondents (67%) felt there is utility for moderate severity endpoints, but cited challenges in their development. Hospitalization as a moderate endpoint of disease severity or measure of public health impact was deemed to be useful by only 47% of respondents, but 89% felt it could bring about supplemental information if carefully contextualized according to data collection setting. Over half of the respondents favored alignment of the standard endpoints with the WHO guidelines (58%), but cautioned that the endpoints could have ramifications for public health practice. In terms of data granularity of the endpoints, there was a slight preference for a categorical vs numeric system (e.g. 1–10) (47% vs 34%), and 74% of respondents suggested validating the endpoints using large prospective data sets. CONCLUSION: The structured consensus-building process was successful taking into account the history of the debate around potential endpoints for severe dengue. There is clear support for the development of standardized endpoints for interventional clinical research and the need for subsequent validation with prospective data sets. Challenges include the complexity of developing moderate disease research endpoints for dengue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62383442018-11-26 Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology Jaenisch, Thomas Hendrickx, Kim Erpicum, Martin Agulto, Liane Tomashek, Kay M. Dempsey, Walla Siqueira, João Bosco Marks, Morgan A. Fay, Michael P. Laughlin, Catherine L’Azou, Maina Leo, Yee-Sin Narvaez, Federico Teyssou, Remy Thomas, Stephen J. Tissera, Hasitha Wallace, Derek Wilder-Smith, Annelies Gubler, Duane J. Cassetti, M. Cristina BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: As increasing numbers of dengue vaccines and therapeutics are in clinical development, standardized consensus clinical endpoint definitions are urgently needed to assess the efficacy of different interventions with respect to disease severity. We aimed to convene dengue experts representing various sectors and dengue endemic areas to review the literature and propose clinical endpoint definitions for moderate and severe disease based on the framework provided by the WHO 2009 classification. METHODS: The endpoints were first proposed and discussed in a structured expert consultation. After that, the Delphi method was carried out to assess the usefulness, validity and feasibility of the standardized clinical disease endpoints for interventional dengue research. RESULTS: Most respondents (> 80%) agreed there is a need for both standardized clinical endpoints and operationalization of severe endpoints. Most respondents (67%) felt there is utility for moderate severity endpoints, but cited challenges in their development. Hospitalization as a moderate endpoint of disease severity or measure of public health impact was deemed to be useful by only 47% of respondents, but 89% felt it could bring about supplemental information if carefully contextualized according to data collection setting. Over half of the respondents favored alignment of the standard endpoints with the WHO guidelines (58%), but cautioned that the endpoints could have ramifications for public health practice. In terms of data granularity of the endpoints, there was a slight preference for a categorical vs numeric system (e.g. 1–10) (47% vs 34%), and 74% of respondents suggested validating the endpoints using large prospective data sets. CONCLUSION: The structured consensus-building process was successful taking into account the history of the debate around potential endpoints for severe dengue. There is clear support for the development of standardized endpoints for interventional clinical research and the need for subsequent validation with prospective data sets. Challenges include the complexity of developing moderate disease research endpoints for dengue. BioMed Central 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6238344/ /pubmed/30442099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0601-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jaenisch, Thomas
Hendrickx, Kim
Erpicum, Martin
Agulto, Liane
Tomashek, Kay M.
Dempsey, Walla
Siqueira, João Bosco
Marks, Morgan A.
Fay, Michael P.
Laughlin, Catherine
L’Azou, Maina
Leo, Yee-Sin
Narvaez, Federico
Teyssou, Remy
Thomas, Stephen J.
Tissera, Hasitha
Wallace, Derek
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Gubler, Duane J.
Cassetti, M. Cristina
Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology
title Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology
title_full Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology
title_fullStr Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology
title_full_unstemmed Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology
title_short Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology
title_sort development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0601-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jaenischthomas developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT hendrickxkim developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT erpicummartin developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT agultoliane developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT tomashekkaym developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT dempseywalla developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT siqueirajoaobosco developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT marksmorgana developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT faymichaelp developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT laughlincatherine developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT lazoumaina developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT leoyeesin developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT narvaezfederico developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT teyssouremy developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT thomasstephenj developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT tisserahasitha developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT wallacederek developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT wildersmithannelies developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT gublerduanej developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology
AT cassettimcristina developmentofstandardclinicalendpointsforuseindengueinterventionaltrialsintroductionandmethodology