Cargando…

Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India

BACKGROUND: Non-optimal blood pressure (BP) levels are a major cause of disease burden globally. We describe current BP and treatment patterns in rural India and compare different approaches to BP lowering in this setting. METHODS: All individuals aged ≥40 years from 54 villages in a South Indian di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Praveen, Devarsetty, Peiris, David, MacMahon, Stephen, Mogulluru, Kishor, Raghu, Arvind, Rodgers, Anthony, Chilappagari, Shailaja, Prabhakaran, Dorairaj, Clifford, Gari D., Maulik, Pallab K., Atkins, Emily, Joshi, Rohina, Heritier, Stephane, Jan, Stephen, Patel, Anushka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x
_version_ 1783371362290630656
author Praveen, Devarsetty
Peiris, David
MacMahon, Stephen
Mogulluru, Kishor
Raghu, Arvind
Rodgers, Anthony
Chilappagari, Shailaja
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Clifford, Gari D.
Maulik, Pallab K.
Atkins, Emily
Joshi, Rohina
Heritier, Stephane
Jan, Stephen
Patel, Anushka
author_facet Praveen, Devarsetty
Peiris, David
MacMahon, Stephen
Mogulluru, Kishor
Raghu, Arvind
Rodgers, Anthony
Chilappagari, Shailaja
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Clifford, Gari D.
Maulik, Pallab K.
Atkins, Emily
Joshi, Rohina
Heritier, Stephane
Jan, Stephen
Patel, Anushka
author_sort Praveen, Devarsetty
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-optimal blood pressure (BP) levels are a major cause of disease burden globally. We describe current BP and treatment patterns in rural India and compare different approaches to BP lowering in this setting. METHODS: All individuals aged ≥40 years from 54 villages in a South Indian district were invited and 62,194 individuals (84%) participated in a cross-sectional study. Individual 10-year absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk was estimated using WHO/ISH charts. Using known effects of treatment, proportions of events that would be averted under different paradigms of BP lowering therapy were estimated. RESULTS: After imputation of pre-treatment BP levels for participants on existing treatment, 76·9% (95% confidence interval, 75.7–78.0%), 5·3% (4.9–5.6%), and 17·8% (16.9–18.8%) of individuals had a 10-year CVD risk defined as low (< 20%), intermediate (20–29%), and high (≥30%, established CVD, or BP > 160/100 mmHg), respectively. Compared to the 19.6% (18.4–20.9%) of adults treated with current practice, a slightly higher or similar proportion would be treated using an intermediate (23·2% (22.0–24.3%)) or high (17·9% (16.9–18.8%) risk threshold for instituting BP lowering therapy and this would avert 87·2% (85.8–88.5%) and 62·7% (60.7–64.6%) more CVD events over ten years, respectively. These strategies were highly cost-effective relative to the current practice. CONCLUSION: In a rural Indian community, a substantial proportion of the population has elevated CVD risk. The more efficient and cost-effective clinical approach to BP lowering is to base treatment decisions on an estimate of an individual’s short-term absolute CVD risk rather than with BP based strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI/2013/06/003753, 14 June 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62383602018-11-26 Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India Praveen, Devarsetty Peiris, David MacMahon, Stephen Mogulluru, Kishor Raghu, Arvind Rodgers, Anthony Chilappagari, Shailaja Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Clifford, Gari D. Maulik, Pallab K. Atkins, Emily Joshi, Rohina Heritier, Stephane Jan, Stephen Patel, Anushka BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Non-optimal blood pressure (BP) levels are a major cause of disease burden globally. We describe current BP and treatment patterns in rural India and compare different approaches to BP lowering in this setting. METHODS: All individuals aged ≥40 years from 54 villages in a South Indian district were invited and 62,194 individuals (84%) participated in a cross-sectional study. Individual 10-year absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk was estimated using WHO/ISH charts. Using known effects of treatment, proportions of events that would be averted under different paradigms of BP lowering therapy were estimated. RESULTS: After imputation of pre-treatment BP levels for participants on existing treatment, 76·9% (95% confidence interval, 75.7–78.0%), 5·3% (4.9–5.6%), and 17·8% (16.9–18.8%) of individuals had a 10-year CVD risk defined as low (< 20%), intermediate (20–29%), and high (≥30%, established CVD, or BP > 160/100 mmHg), respectively. Compared to the 19.6% (18.4–20.9%) of adults treated with current practice, a slightly higher or similar proportion would be treated using an intermediate (23·2% (22.0–24.3%)) or high (17·9% (16.9–18.8%) risk threshold for instituting BP lowering therapy and this would avert 87·2% (85.8–88.5%) and 62·7% (60.7–64.6%) more CVD events over ten years, respectively. These strategies were highly cost-effective relative to the current practice. CONCLUSION: In a rural Indian community, a substantial proportion of the population has elevated CVD risk. The more efficient and cost-effective clinical approach to BP lowering is to base treatment decisions on an estimate of an individual’s short-term absolute CVD risk rather than with BP based strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI/2013/06/003753, 14 June 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6238360/ /pubmed/30442122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Praveen, Devarsetty
Peiris, David
MacMahon, Stephen
Mogulluru, Kishor
Raghu, Arvind
Rodgers, Anthony
Chilappagari, Shailaja
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Clifford, Gari D.
Maulik, Pallab K.
Atkins, Emily
Joshi, Rohina
Heritier, Stephane
Jan, Stephen
Patel, Anushka
Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India
title Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India
title_full Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India
title_fullStr Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India
title_short Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India
title_sort cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural india
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x
work_keys_str_mv AT praveendevarsetty cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT peirisdavid cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT macmahonstephen cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT mogullurukishor cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT raghuarvind cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT rodgersanthony cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT chilappagarishailaja cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT prabhakarandorairaj cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT cliffordgarid cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT maulikpallabk cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT atkinsemily cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT joshirohina cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT heritierstephane cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT janstephen cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia
AT patelanushka cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia