Cargando…
Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India
BACKGROUND: Non-optimal blood pressure (BP) levels are a major cause of disease burden globally. We describe current BP and treatment patterns in rural India and compare different approaches to BP lowering in this setting. METHODS: All individuals aged ≥40 years from 54 villages in a South Indian di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x |
_version_ | 1783371362290630656 |
---|---|
author | Praveen, Devarsetty Peiris, David MacMahon, Stephen Mogulluru, Kishor Raghu, Arvind Rodgers, Anthony Chilappagari, Shailaja Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Clifford, Gari D. Maulik, Pallab K. Atkins, Emily Joshi, Rohina Heritier, Stephane Jan, Stephen Patel, Anushka |
author_facet | Praveen, Devarsetty Peiris, David MacMahon, Stephen Mogulluru, Kishor Raghu, Arvind Rodgers, Anthony Chilappagari, Shailaja Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Clifford, Gari D. Maulik, Pallab K. Atkins, Emily Joshi, Rohina Heritier, Stephane Jan, Stephen Patel, Anushka |
author_sort | Praveen, Devarsetty |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Non-optimal blood pressure (BP) levels are a major cause of disease burden globally. We describe current BP and treatment patterns in rural India and compare different approaches to BP lowering in this setting. METHODS: All individuals aged ≥40 years from 54 villages in a South Indian district were invited and 62,194 individuals (84%) participated in a cross-sectional study. Individual 10-year absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk was estimated using WHO/ISH charts. Using known effects of treatment, proportions of events that would be averted under different paradigms of BP lowering therapy were estimated. RESULTS: After imputation of pre-treatment BP levels for participants on existing treatment, 76·9% (95% confidence interval, 75.7–78.0%), 5·3% (4.9–5.6%), and 17·8% (16.9–18.8%) of individuals had a 10-year CVD risk defined as low (< 20%), intermediate (20–29%), and high (≥30%, established CVD, or BP > 160/100 mmHg), respectively. Compared to the 19.6% (18.4–20.9%) of adults treated with current practice, a slightly higher or similar proportion would be treated using an intermediate (23·2% (22.0–24.3%)) or high (17·9% (16.9–18.8%) risk threshold for instituting BP lowering therapy and this would avert 87·2% (85.8–88.5%) and 62·7% (60.7–64.6%) more CVD events over ten years, respectively. These strategies were highly cost-effective relative to the current practice. CONCLUSION: In a rural Indian community, a substantial proportion of the population has elevated CVD risk. The more efficient and cost-effective clinical approach to BP lowering is to base treatment decisions on an estimate of an individual’s short-term absolute CVD risk rather than with BP based strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI/2013/06/003753, 14 June 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6238360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62383602018-11-26 Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India Praveen, Devarsetty Peiris, David MacMahon, Stephen Mogulluru, Kishor Raghu, Arvind Rodgers, Anthony Chilappagari, Shailaja Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Clifford, Gari D. Maulik, Pallab K. Atkins, Emily Joshi, Rohina Heritier, Stephane Jan, Stephen Patel, Anushka BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Non-optimal blood pressure (BP) levels are a major cause of disease burden globally. We describe current BP and treatment patterns in rural India and compare different approaches to BP lowering in this setting. METHODS: All individuals aged ≥40 years from 54 villages in a South Indian district were invited and 62,194 individuals (84%) participated in a cross-sectional study. Individual 10-year absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk was estimated using WHO/ISH charts. Using known effects of treatment, proportions of events that would be averted under different paradigms of BP lowering therapy were estimated. RESULTS: After imputation of pre-treatment BP levels for participants on existing treatment, 76·9% (95% confidence interval, 75.7–78.0%), 5·3% (4.9–5.6%), and 17·8% (16.9–18.8%) of individuals had a 10-year CVD risk defined as low (< 20%), intermediate (20–29%), and high (≥30%, established CVD, or BP > 160/100 mmHg), respectively. Compared to the 19.6% (18.4–20.9%) of adults treated with current practice, a slightly higher or similar proportion would be treated using an intermediate (23·2% (22.0–24.3%)) or high (17·9% (16.9–18.8%) risk threshold for instituting BP lowering therapy and this would avert 87·2% (85.8–88.5%) and 62·7% (60.7–64.6%) more CVD events over ten years, respectively. These strategies were highly cost-effective relative to the current practice. CONCLUSION: In a rural Indian community, a substantial proportion of the population has elevated CVD risk. The more efficient and cost-effective clinical approach to BP lowering is to base treatment decisions on an estimate of an individual’s short-term absolute CVD risk rather than with BP based strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI/2013/06/003753, 14 June 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6238360/ /pubmed/30442122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Praveen, Devarsetty Peiris, David MacMahon, Stephen Mogulluru, Kishor Raghu, Arvind Rodgers, Anthony Chilappagari, Shailaja Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Clifford, Gari D. Maulik, Pallab K. Atkins, Emily Joshi, Rohina Heritier, Stephane Jan, Stephen Patel, Anushka Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India |
title | Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India |
title_full | Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India |
title_fullStr | Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India |
title_short | Cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural India |
title_sort | cardiovascular disease risk and comparison of different strategies for blood pressure management in rural india |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6142-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT praveendevarsetty cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT peirisdavid cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT macmahonstephen cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT mogullurukishor cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT raghuarvind cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT rodgersanthony cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT chilappagarishailaja cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT prabhakarandorairaj cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT cliffordgarid cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT maulikpallabk cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT atkinsemily cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT joshirohina cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT heritierstephane cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT janstephen cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia AT patelanushka cardiovasculardiseaseriskandcomparisonofdifferentstrategiesforbloodpressuremanagementinruralindia |