Cargando…
Can automated content analysis be used to assess and improve the use of evidence in mental health policy? A systematic review
BACKGROUND: This review assesses the utility of applying an automated content analysis method to the field of mental health policy development. We considered the possibility of using the Wordscores algorithm to assess research and policy texts in ways that facilitate the uptake of research into ment...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0853-z |
_version_ | 1783371370127687680 |
---|---|
author | Alla, Kristel Oprescu, Florin Hall, Wayne D. Whiteford, Harvey A. Head, Brian W. Meurk, Carla S. |
author_facet | Alla, Kristel Oprescu, Florin Hall, Wayne D. Whiteford, Harvey A. Head, Brian W. Meurk, Carla S. |
author_sort | Alla, Kristel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This review assesses the utility of applying an automated content analysis method to the field of mental health policy development. We considered the possibility of using the Wordscores algorithm to assess research and policy texts in ways that facilitate the uptake of research into mental health policy. METHODS: The PRISMA framework and the McMaster appraisal tools were used to systematically review and report on the strengths and limitations of the Wordscores algorithm. Nine electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2003 and 2016. Inclusion criteria were (1) articles had to be published in public health, political science, social science or health services disciplines; (2) articles had to be research articles or opinion pieces that used Wordscores; and (3) articles had to discuss both strengths and limitations of using Wordscores for content analysis. RESULTS: The literature search returned 118 results. Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. These articles explored a range of policy questions and appraised different aspects of the Wordscores method. DISCUSSION: Following synthesis of the material, we identified the following as potential strengths of Wordscores: (1) the Wordscores algorithm can be used at all stages of policy development; (2) it is valid and reliable; (3) it can be used to determine the alignment of health policy drafts with research evidence; (4) it enables existing policies to be revised in the light of research; and (5) it can determine whether changes in policy over time were supported by the evidence. Potential limitations identified were (1) decreased accuracy with short documents, (2) words constitute the unit of analysis and (3) expertise is needed to choose ‘reference texts’. CONCLUSIONS: Automated content analysis may be useful in assessing and improving the use of evidence in mental health policies. Wordscores is an automated content analysis option for comparing policy and research texts that could be used by both researchers and policymakers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0853-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6238396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62383962018-11-26 Can automated content analysis be used to assess and improve the use of evidence in mental health policy? A systematic review Alla, Kristel Oprescu, Florin Hall, Wayne D. Whiteford, Harvey A. Head, Brian W. Meurk, Carla S. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: This review assesses the utility of applying an automated content analysis method to the field of mental health policy development. We considered the possibility of using the Wordscores algorithm to assess research and policy texts in ways that facilitate the uptake of research into mental health policy. METHODS: The PRISMA framework and the McMaster appraisal tools were used to systematically review and report on the strengths and limitations of the Wordscores algorithm. Nine electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2003 and 2016. Inclusion criteria were (1) articles had to be published in public health, political science, social science or health services disciplines; (2) articles had to be research articles or opinion pieces that used Wordscores; and (3) articles had to discuss both strengths and limitations of using Wordscores for content analysis. RESULTS: The literature search returned 118 results. Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. These articles explored a range of policy questions and appraised different aspects of the Wordscores method. DISCUSSION: Following synthesis of the material, we identified the following as potential strengths of Wordscores: (1) the Wordscores algorithm can be used at all stages of policy development; (2) it is valid and reliable; (3) it can be used to determine the alignment of health policy drafts with research evidence; (4) it enables existing policies to be revised in the light of research; and (5) it can determine whether changes in policy over time were supported by the evidence. Potential limitations identified were (1) decreased accuracy with short documents, (2) words constitute the unit of analysis and (3) expertise is needed to choose ‘reference texts’. CONCLUSIONS: Automated content analysis may be useful in assessing and improving the use of evidence in mental health policies. Wordscores is an automated content analysis option for comparing policy and research texts that could be used by both researchers and policymakers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0853-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6238396/ /pubmed/30442191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0853-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Alla, Kristel Oprescu, Florin Hall, Wayne D. Whiteford, Harvey A. Head, Brian W. Meurk, Carla S. Can automated content analysis be used to assess and improve the use of evidence in mental health policy? A systematic review |
title | Can automated content analysis be used to assess and improve the use of evidence in mental health policy? A systematic review |
title_full | Can automated content analysis be used to assess and improve the use of evidence in mental health policy? A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Can automated content analysis be used to assess and improve the use of evidence in mental health policy? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Can automated content analysis be used to assess and improve the use of evidence in mental health policy? A systematic review |
title_short | Can automated content analysis be used to assess and improve the use of evidence in mental health policy? A systematic review |
title_sort | can automated content analysis be used to assess and improve the use of evidence in mental health policy? a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0853-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allakristel canautomatedcontentanalysisbeusedtoassessandimprovetheuseofevidenceinmentalhealthpolicyasystematicreview AT oprescuflorin canautomatedcontentanalysisbeusedtoassessandimprovetheuseofevidenceinmentalhealthpolicyasystematicreview AT hallwayned canautomatedcontentanalysisbeusedtoassessandimprovetheuseofevidenceinmentalhealthpolicyasystematicreview AT whitefordharveya canautomatedcontentanalysisbeusedtoassessandimprovetheuseofevidenceinmentalhealthpolicyasystematicreview AT headbrianw canautomatedcontentanalysisbeusedtoassessandimprovetheuseofevidenceinmentalhealthpolicyasystematicreview AT meurkcarlas canautomatedcontentanalysisbeusedtoassessandimprovetheuseofevidenceinmentalhealthpolicyasystematicreview |