Cargando…
‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’
BACKGROUND: European legislation dictates that pig tail docking is not allowed to be performed routinely (European Union. Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. OJ L 47, 18.2.2009). Nevertheless, tail docking is still practiced rou...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0103-8 |
_version_ | 1783371371284267008 |
---|---|
author | De Briyne, Nancy Berg, Charlotte Blaha, Thomas Palzer, Andreas Temple, Déborah |
author_facet | De Briyne, Nancy Berg, Charlotte Blaha, Thomas Palzer, Andreas Temple, Déborah |
author_sort | De Briyne, Nancy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: European legislation dictates that pig tail docking is not allowed to be performed routinely (European Union. Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. OJ L 47, 18.2.2009). Nevertheless, tail docking is still practiced routinely in many European countries, while four countries stopped routine tail docking completely. Tail docking is also practiced in many countries outside Europe. The Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE), the European Association of Porcine Health Management (EAPHM) together with the European Commission carried out an online survey to investigate the situation regarding the practice of pig tail docking and the provision of enrichment material across 24 European countries. It also focuses on the role of the veterinary profession and gives an overview on published literature regarding the challenges and possibilities related to the raising of pigs with intact tails. RESULTS: Fifty-seven (57) usable survey responses from 24 countries were received. On average 77% (median = 95%) of pigs are routinely tail-docked. In Finland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, less than 5% of the pigs are tail-docked. According to the respondents, 67% of pigs (median = 76%) across the 24 EU countries surveyed are given suitable enrichment materials. Training of veterinary practitioners, their role in advising the producer and undertaking a risk assessment of tail biting were more positively valued in countries that stopped routine tail docking than in countries that had not stopped routine tail docking. Initiatives such as training from national authorities to encourage abandoning tail docking and routine recording of tail biting at the slaughterhouse were identified as two successful items to promote the raising of pigs with entire tails. CONCLUSION: In many European countries the majority of the pigs are still routinely tail-docked, which is a violation of the European legislation. To stop routine tail docking it is necessary to raise the awareness and education about risk factors to prevent tail biting. The growing knowledge about the reasons for failing voluntary national initiatives as well as about successful measures taken by some countries to make pig production with intact tails feasible should be distributed throughout the EU pig producing community. The veterinary profession has a significant role to play in raising awareness, facilitate knowledge transfer and to identify risk factors and solutions on farm level for the benefit of pig health and welfare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6238401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62384012018-11-23 ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’ De Briyne, Nancy Berg, Charlotte Blaha, Thomas Palzer, Andreas Temple, Déborah Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: European legislation dictates that pig tail docking is not allowed to be performed routinely (European Union. Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. OJ L 47, 18.2.2009). Nevertheless, tail docking is still practiced routinely in many European countries, while four countries stopped routine tail docking completely. Tail docking is also practiced in many countries outside Europe. The Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE), the European Association of Porcine Health Management (EAPHM) together with the European Commission carried out an online survey to investigate the situation regarding the practice of pig tail docking and the provision of enrichment material across 24 European countries. It also focuses on the role of the veterinary profession and gives an overview on published literature regarding the challenges and possibilities related to the raising of pigs with intact tails. RESULTS: Fifty-seven (57) usable survey responses from 24 countries were received. On average 77% (median = 95%) of pigs are routinely tail-docked. In Finland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, less than 5% of the pigs are tail-docked. According to the respondents, 67% of pigs (median = 76%) across the 24 EU countries surveyed are given suitable enrichment materials. Training of veterinary practitioners, their role in advising the producer and undertaking a risk assessment of tail biting were more positively valued in countries that stopped routine tail docking than in countries that had not stopped routine tail docking. Initiatives such as training from national authorities to encourage abandoning tail docking and routine recording of tail biting at the slaughterhouse were identified as two successful items to promote the raising of pigs with entire tails. CONCLUSION: In many European countries the majority of the pigs are still routinely tail-docked, which is a violation of the European legislation. To stop routine tail docking it is necessary to raise the awareness and education about risk factors to prevent tail biting. The growing knowledge about the reasons for failing voluntary national initiatives as well as about successful measures taken by some countries to make pig production with intact tails feasible should be distributed throughout the EU pig producing community. The veterinary profession has a significant role to play in raising awareness, facilitate knowledge transfer and to identify risk factors and solutions on farm level for the benefit of pig health and welfare. BioMed Central 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6238401/ /pubmed/30473870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0103-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research De Briyne, Nancy Berg, Charlotte Blaha, Thomas Palzer, Andreas Temple, Déborah ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’ |
title | ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’ |
title_full | ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’ |
title_fullStr | ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’ |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’ |
title_short | ‘Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities’ |
title_sort | ‘phasing out pig tail docking in the eu - present state, challenges and possibilities’ |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-018-0103-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debriynenancy phasingoutpigtaildockingintheeupresentstatechallengesandpossibilities AT bergcharlotte phasingoutpigtaildockingintheeupresentstatechallengesandpossibilities AT blahathomas phasingoutpigtaildockingintheeupresentstatechallengesandpossibilities AT palzerandreas phasingoutpigtaildockingintheeupresentstatechallengesandpossibilities AT templedeborah phasingoutpigtaildockingintheeupresentstatechallengesandpossibilities |