Cargando…
S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters
Imaging of transcription by quantitative fluorescence-based techniques allows the examination of gene expression kinetics in single cells. Using a cell system for the in vivo visualization of mammalian mRNA transcriptional kinetics at single-gene resolution during the cell cycle, we previously demon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Life Science Alliance LLC
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456379 http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201800086 |
_version_ | 1783371418121011200 |
---|---|
author | Yunger, Sharon Kafri, Pinhas Rosenfeld, Liat Greenberg, Eliraz Kinor, Noa Garini, Yuval Shav-Tal, Yaron |
author_facet | Yunger, Sharon Kafri, Pinhas Rosenfeld, Liat Greenberg, Eliraz Kinor, Noa Garini, Yuval Shav-Tal, Yaron |
author_sort | Yunger, Sharon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Imaging of transcription by quantitative fluorescence-based techniques allows the examination of gene expression kinetics in single cells. Using a cell system for the in vivo visualization of mammalian mRNA transcriptional kinetics at single-gene resolution during the cell cycle, we previously demonstrated a reduction in transcription levels after replication. This phenomenon has been described as a homeostasis mechanism that buffers mRNA transcription levels with respect to the cell cycle stage and the number of transcribing alleles. Here, we examined how transcriptional buffering enforced during S phase affects two different promoters, the cytomegalovirus promoter versus the cyclin D1 promoter, that drive the same gene body. We found that global modulation of histone modifications could completely revert the transcription down-regulation imposed during replication. Furthermore, measuring these levels of transcriptional activity in fixed and living cells showed that the transcriptional potential of the genes was significantly higher than actual transcription levels, suggesting that promoters might normally be limited from reaching their full transcriptional potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6238621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Life Science Alliance LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62386212018-11-19 S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters Yunger, Sharon Kafri, Pinhas Rosenfeld, Liat Greenberg, Eliraz Kinor, Noa Garini, Yuval Shav-Tal, Yaron Life Sci Alliance Research Articles Imaging of transcription by quantitative fluorescence-based techniques allows the examination of gene expression kinetics in single cells. Using a cell system for the in vivo visualization of mammalian mRNA transcriptional kinetics at single-gene resolution during the cell cycle, we previously demonstrated a reduction in transcription levels after replication. This phenomenon has been described as a homeostasis mechanism that buffers mRNA transcription levels with respect to the cell cycle stage and the number of transcribing alleles. Here, we examined how transcriptional buffering enforced during S phase affects two different promoters, the cytomegalovirus promoter versus the cyclin D1 promoter, that drive the same gene body. We found that global modulation of histone modifications could completely revert the transcription down-regulation imposed during replication. Furthermore, measuring these levels of transcriptional activity in fixed and living cells showed that the transcriptional potential of the genes was significantly higher than actual transcription levels, suggesting that promoters might normally be limited from reaching their full transcriptional potential. Life Science Alliance LLC 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6238621/ /pubmed/30456379 http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201800086 Text en © 2018 Yunger et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Yunger, Sharon Kafri, Pinhas Rosenfeld, Liat Greenberg, Eliraz Kinor, Noa Garini, Yuval Shav-Tal, Yaron S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters |
title | S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters |
title_full | S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters |
title_fullStr | S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters |
title_full_unstemmed | S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters |
title_short | S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters |
title_sort | s-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456379 http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201800086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yungersharon sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters AT kafripinhas sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters AT rosenfeldliat sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters AT greenbergeliraz sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters AT kinornoa sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters AT gariniyuval sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters AT shavtalyaron sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters |