Cargando…

S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters

Imaging of transcription by quantitative fluorescence-based techniques allows the examination of gene expression kinetics in single cells. Using a cell system for the in vivo visualization of mammalian mRNA transcriptional kinetics at single-gene resolution during the cell cycle, we previously demon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yunger, Sharon, Kafri, Pinhas, Rosenfeld, Liat, Greenberg, Eliraz, Kinor, Noa, Garini, Yuval, Shav-Tal, Yaron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Life Science Alliance LLC 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456379
http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201800086
_version_ 1783371418121011200
author Yunger, Sharon
Kafri, Pinhas
Rosenfeld, Liat
Greenberg, Eliraz
Kinor, Noa
Garini, Yuval
Shav-Tal, Yaron
author_facet Yunger, Sharon
Kafri, Pinhas
Rosenfeld, Liat
Greenberg, Eliraz
Kinor, Noa
Garini, Yuval
Shav-Tal, Yaron
author_sort Yunger, Sharon
collection PubMed
description Imaging of transcription by quantitative fluorescence-based techniques allows the examination of gene expression kinetics in single cells. Using a cell system for the in vivo visualization of mammalian mRNA transcriptional kinetics at single-gene resolution during the cell cycle, we previously demonstrated a reduction in transcription levels after replication. This phenomenon has been described as a homeostasis mechanism that buffers mRNA transcription levels with respect to the cell cycle stage and the number of transcribing alleles. Here, we examined how transcriptional buffering enforced during S phase affects two different promoters, the cytomegalovirus promoter versus the cyclin D1 promoter, that drive the same gene body. We found that global modulation of histone modifications could completely revert the transcription down-regulation imposed during replication. Furthermore, measuring these levels of transcriptional activity in fixed and living cells showed that the transcriptional potential of the genes was significantly higher than actual transcription levels, suggesting that promoters might normally be limited from reaching their full transcriptional potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Life Science Alliance LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62386212018-11-19 S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters Yunger, Sharon Kafri, Pinhas Rosenfeld, Liat Greenberg, Eliraz Kinor, Noa Garini, Yuval Shav-Tal, Yaron Life Sci Alliance Research Articles Imaging of transcription by quantitative fluorescence-based techniques allows the examination of gene expression kinetics in single cells. Using a cell system for the in vivo visualization of mammalian mRNA transcriptional kinetics at single-gene resolution during the cell cycle, we previously demonstrated a reduction in transcription levels after replication. This phenomenon has been described as a homeostasis mechanism that buffers mRNA transcription levels with respect to the cell cycle stage and the number of transcribing alleles. Here, we examined how transcriptional buffering enforced during S phase affects two different promoters, the cytomegalovirus promoter versus the cyclin D1 promoter, that drive the same gene body. We found that global modulation of histone modifications could completely revert the transcription down-regulation imposed during replication. Furthermore, measuring these levels of transcriptional activity in fixed and living cells showed that the transcriptional potential of the genes was significantly higher than actual transcription levels, suggesting that promoters might normally be limited from reaching their full transcriptional potential. Life Science Alliance LLC 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6238621/ /pubmed/30456379 http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201800086 Text en © 2018 Yunger et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Yunger, Sharon
Kafri, Pinhas
Rosenfeld, Liat
Greenberg, Eliraz
Kinor, Noa
Garini, Yuval
Shav-Tal, Yaron
S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters
title S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters
title_full S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters
title_fullStr S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters
title_full_unstemmed S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters
title_short S-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters
title_sort s-phase transcriptional buffering quantified on two different promoters
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456379
http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201800086
work_keys_str_mv AT yungersharon sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters
AT kafripinhas sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters
AT rosenfeldliat sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters
AT greenbergeliraz sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters
AT kinornoa sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters
AT gariniyuval sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters
AT shavtalyaron sphasetranscriptionalbufferingquantifiedontwodifferentpromoters