Cargando…
Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis
PURPOSE: Redo surgery in patients with a persistent anastomotic failure (PAF) is a rare procedure, and data about this procedure are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of redo surgery in such patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF from January 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Coloproctology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.04 |
_version_ | 1783371453337436160 |
---|---|
author | Woo, In Teak Park, Jun Seok Choi, Gyu-Seog Park, Soo Yeun Kim, Hye Jin Park, In Kyu |
author_facet | Woo, In Teak Park, Jun Seok Choi, Gyu-Seog Park, Soo Yeun Kim, Hye Jin Park, In Kyu |
author_sort | Woo, In Teak |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Redo surgery in patients with a persistent anastomotic failure (PAF) is a rare procedure, and data about this procedure are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of redo surgery in such patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF from January 2004 to November 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data from a prospective colorectal database were analyzed. Success was defined as the combined absence of any anastomosis-related complications and a stoma at the last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1,964 patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer during this study period were included. Among them, 32 consecutive patients underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF. Thirteen patients of those 32 had major anastomotic dehiscence with a pelvic sinus, 12 had a recto-vaginal fistula, and 7 had anastomosis stenosis. There were no postoperative deaths. The median operation time was 255 minutes (range, 80–480 minutes), and the median blood loss was 80 mL (range, 30–1,000 mL). The overall success rate was 78.1%, and the morbidity rate was 40.6%. Multivariable analyses showed that the primary tumor height at the lower level was the only statistically significant risk factor for redo surgery (P = 0.042; hazard ratio, 2.444). CONCLUSION: In our experience, a redo anastomosis is a feasible surgical option that allows closure of a stoma in nearly 80% of patients. Lower tumor height (<5 cm from the anal verge) is the only independent risk factor for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas after primary rectal surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6238803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Society of Coloproctology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62388032018-11-26 Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis Woo, In Teak Park, Jun Seok Choi, Gyu-Seog Park, Soo Yeun Kim, Hye Jin Park, In Kyu Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Redo surgery in patients with a persistent anastomotic failure (PAF) is a rare procedure, and data about this procedure are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of redo surgery in such patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF from January 2004 to November 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data from a prospective colorectal database were analyzed. Success was defined as the combined absence of any anastomosis-related complications and a stoma at the last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1,964 patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer during this study period were included. Among them, 32 consecutive patients underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF. Thirteen patients of those 32 had major anastomotic dehiscence with a pelvic sinus, 12 had a recto-vaginal fistula, and 7 had anastomosis stenosis. There were no postoperative deaths. The median operation time was 255 minutes (range, 80–480 minutes), and the median blood loss was 80 mL (range, 30–1,000 mL). The overall success rate was 78.1%, and the morbidity rate was 40.6%. Multivariable analyses showed that the primary tumor height at the lower level was the only statistically significant risk factor for redo surgery (P = 0.042; hazard ratio, 2.444). CONCLUSION: In our experience, a redo anastomosis is a feasible surgical option that allows closure of a stoma in nearly 80% of patients. Lower tumor height (<5 cm from the anal verge) is the only independent risk factor for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas after primary rectal surgery. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2018-10 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6238803/ /pubmed/30419724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.04 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society of Coloproctology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Woo, In Teak Park, Jun Seok Choi, Gyu-Seog Park, Soo Yeun Kim, Hye Jin Park, In Kyu Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis |
title | Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis |
title_full | Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis |
title_short | Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of a redo for a failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.04 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woointeak clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis AT parkjunseok clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis AT choigyuseog clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis AT parksooyeun clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis AT kimhyejin clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis AT parkinkyu clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis |