Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis

PURPOSE: Redo surgery in patients with a persistent anastomotic failure (PAF) is a rare procedure, and data about this procedure are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of redo surgery in such patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF from January 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woo, In Teak, Park, Jun Seok, Choi, Gyu-Seog, Park, Soo Yeun, Kim, Hye Jin, Park, In Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Coloproctology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419724
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.04
_version_ 1783371453337436160
author Woo, In Teak
Park, Jun Seok
Choi, Gyu-Seog
Park, Soo Yeun
Kim, Hye Jin
Park, In Kyu
author_facet Woo, In Teak
Park, Jun Seok
Choi, Gyu-Seog
Park, Soo Yeun
Kim, Hye Jin
Park, In Kyu
author_sort Woo, In Teak
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Redo surgery in patients with a persistent anastomotic failure (PAF) is a rare procedure, and data about this procedure are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of redo surgery in such patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF from January 2004 to November 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data from a prospective colorectal database were analyzed. Success was defined as the combined absence of any anastomosis-related complications and a stoma at the last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1,964 patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer during this study period were included. Among them, 32 consecutive patients underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF. Thirteen patients of those 32 had major anastomotic dehiscence with a pelvic sinus, 12 had a recto-vaginal fistula, and 7 had anastomosis stenosis. There were no postoperative deaths. The median operation time was 255 minutes (range, 80–480 minutes), and the median blood loss was 80 mL (range, 30–1,000 mL). The overall success rate was 78.1%, and the morbidity rate was 40.6%. Multivariable analyses showed that the primary tumor height at the lower level was the only statistically significant risk factor for redo surgery (P = 0.042; hazard ratio, 2.444). CONCLUSION: In our experience, a redo anastomosis is a feasible surgical option that allows closure of a stoma in nearly 80% of patients. Lower tumor height (<5 cm from the anal verge) is the only independent risk factor for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas after primary rectal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62388032018-11-26 Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis Woo, In Teak Park, Jun Seok Choi, Gyu-Seog Park, Soo Yeun Kim, Hye Jin Park, In Kyu Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Redo surgery in patients with a persistent anastomotic failure (PAF) is a rare procedure, and data about this procedure are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of redo surgery in such patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF from January 2004 to November 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data from a prospective colorectal database were analyzed. Success was defined as the combined absence of any anastomosis-related complications and a stoma at the last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1,964 patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer during this study period were included. Among them, 32 consecutive patients underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF. Thirteen patients of those 32 had major anastomotic dehiscence with a pelvic sinus, 12 had a recto-vaginal fistula, and 7 had anastomosis stenosis. There were no postoperative deaths. The median operation time was 255 minutes (range, 80–480 minutes), and the median blood loss was 80 mL (range, 30–1,000 mL). The overall success rate was 78.1%, and the morbidity rate was 40.6%. Multivariable analyses showed that the primary tumor height at the lower level was the only statistically significant risk factor for redo surgery (P = 0.042; hazard ratio, 2.444). CONCLUSION: In our experience, a redo anastomosis is a feasible surgical option that allows closure of a stoma in nearly 80% of patients. Lower tumor height (<5 cm from the anal verge) is the only independent risk factor for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas after primary rectal surgery. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2018-10 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6238803/ /pubmed/30419724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.04 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society of Coloproctology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Woo, In Teak
Park, Jun Seok
Choi, Gyu-Seog
Park, Soo Yeun
Kim, Hye Jin
Park, In Kyu
Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis
title Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis
title_full Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis
title_short Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis
title_sort clinical outcomes of a redo for a failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419724
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.04
work_keys_str_mv AT woointeak clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis
AT parkjunseok clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis
AT choigyuseog clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis
AT parksooyeun clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis
AT kimhyejin clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis
AT parkinkyu clinicaloutcomesofaredoforafailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosis