Cargando…

Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish whether there is a difference in the presence of potentially pathogenic anaerobic microorganisms around the implant and the homologous tooth in implant-prosthetic patients who received individual information about maintaining their oral hygiene....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savić, Ines, Bošnjak, Andrija, Beader, Nataša, Lovrić, Željka, Salihagić, Adi, Gašparac, Ivo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510295
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/3
_version_ 1783371471010136064
author Savić, Ines
Bošnjak, Andrija
Beader, Nataša
Lovrić, Željka
Salihagić, Adi
Gašparac, Ivo
author_facet Savić, Ines
Bošnjak, Andrija
Beader, Nataša
Lovrić, Željka
Salihagić, Adi
Gašparac, Ivo
author_sort Savić, Ines
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish whether there is a difference in the presence of potentially pathogenic anaerobic microorganisms around the implant and the homologous tooth in implant-prosthetic patients who received individual information about maintaining their oral hygiene. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 30 subjects with dental implants and metal-ceramic crowns. A periodontal probe was used to record the approximal plaque index (API), the papilla bleeding index (PBI), the periodontal pocket probing depth (PD) and the gingival recession. The fluid around the implant and the gingival sulcus fluid around the homologous tooth on the opposite lateral side were sampled. RESULTS: The results have shown a positive API and PBI on 30% of the implants and a negative one on 70% of the implants. The average mucosal retraction measured around the implants was 0.15 mm, and the average probing depth was 2.25 mm. The API and PBI were positive on 78.3% of the homologous teeth. The average gingival retraction measured was 1.06 mm, and the average probing depth was 1.85 mm. Anaerobic bacteria were found in 12 out of 30 subjects (40%). Anaerobic bacteria were isolated only on the implant in 7 subjects, only on the homologous tooth in 3 subjects and both on the implant and the homologous tooth in 2 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Anaerobic bacteria were more abundantly present on implants than on homologous teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6238878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62388782018-12-03 Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation Savić, Ines Bošnjak, Andrija Beader, Nataša Lovrić, Željka Salihagić, Adi Gašparac, Ivo Acta Stomatol Croat Original Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish whether there is a difference in the presence of potentially pathogenic anaerobic microorganisms around the implant and the homologous tooth in implant-prosthetic patients who received individual information about maintaining their oral hygiene. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 30 subjects with dental implants and metal-ceramic crowns. A periodontal probe was used to record the approximal plaque index (API), the papilla bleeding index (PBI), the periodontal pocket probing depth (PD) and the gingival recession. The fluid around the implant and the gingival sulcus fluid around the homologous tooth on the opposite lateral side were sampled. RESULTS: The results have shown a positive API and PBI on 30% of the implants and a negative one on 70% of the implants. The average mucosal retraction measured around the implants was 0.15 mm, and the average probing depth was 2.25 mm. The API and PBI were positive on 78.3% of the homologous teeth. The average gingival retraction measured was 1.06 mm, and the average probing depth was 1.85 mm. Anaerobic bacteria were found in 12 out of 30 subjects (40%). Anaerobic bacteria were isolated only on the implant in 7 subjects, only on the homologous tooth in 3 subjects and both on the implant and the homologous tooth in 2 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Anaerobic bacteria were more abundantly present on implants than on homologous teeth. University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6238878/ /pubmed/30510295 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/3 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Savić, Ines
Bošnjak, Andrija
Beader, Nataša
Lovrić, Željka
Salihagić, Adi
Gašparac, Ivo
Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation
title Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation
title_full Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation
title_fullStr Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation
title_short Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation
title_sort anaerobic bacteria in implants and homologous teeth 2-14 years after implantation
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510295
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/3
work_keys_str_mv AT savicines anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation
AT bosnjakandrija anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation
AT beadernatasa anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation
AT lovriczeljka anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation
AT salihagicadi anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation
AT gasparacivo anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation