Cargando…
Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish whether there is a difference in the presence of potentially pathogenic anaerobic microorganisms around the implant and the homologous tooth in implant-prosthetic patients who received individual information about maintaining their oral hygiene....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510295 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/3 |
_version_ | 1783371471010136064 |
---|---|
author | Savić, Ines Bošnjak, Andrija Beader, Nataša Lovrić, Željka Salihagić, Adi Gašparac, Ivo |
author_facet | Savić, Ines Bošnjak, Andrija Beader, Nataša Lovrić, Željka Salihagić, Adi Gašparac, Ivo |
author_sort | Savić, Ines |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish whether there is a difference in the presence of potentially pathogenic anaerobic microorganisms around the implant and the homologous tooth in implant-prosthetic patients who received individual information about maintaining their oral hygiene. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 30 subjects with dental implants and metal-ceramic crowns. A periodontal probe was used to record the approximal plaque index (API), the papilla bleeding index (PBI), the periodontal pocket probing depth (PD) and the gingival recession. The fluid around the implant and the gingival sulcus fluid around the homologous tooth on the opposite lateral side were sampled. RESULTS: The results have shown a positive API and PBI on 30% of the implants and a negative one on 70% of the implants. The average mucosal retraction measured around the implants was 0.15 mm, and the average probing depth was 2.25 mm. The API and PBI were positive on 78.3% of the homologous teeth. The average gingival retraction measured was 1.06 mm, and the average probing depth was 1.85 mm. Anaerobic bacteria were found in 12 out of 30 subjects (40%). Anaerobic bacteria were isolated only on the implant in 7 subjects, only on the homologous tooth in 3 subjects and both on the implant and the homologous tooth in 2 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Anaerobic bacteria were more abundantly present on implants than on homologous teeth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6238878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62388782018-12-03 Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation Savić, Ines Bošnjak, Andrija Beader, Nataša Lovrić, Željka Salihagić, Adi Gašparac, Ivo Acta Stomatol Croat Original Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish whether there is a difference in the presence of potentially pathogenic anaerobic microorganisms around the implant and the homologous tooth in implant-prosthetic patients who received individual information about maintaining their oral hygiene. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 30 subjects with dental implants and metal-ceramic crowns. A periodontal probe was used to record the approximal plaque index (API), the papilla bleeding index (PBI), the periodontal pocket probing depth (PD) and the gingival recession. The fluid around the implant and the gingival sulcus fluid around the homologous tooth on the opposite lateral side were sampled. RESULTS: The results have shown a positive API and PBI on 30% of the implants and a negative one on 70% of the implants. The average mucosal retraction measured around the implants was 0.15 mm, and the average probing depth was 2.25 mm. The API and PBI were positive on 78.3% of the homologous teeth. The average gingival retraction measured was 1.06 mm, and the average probing depth was 1.85 mm. Anaerobic bacteria were found in 12 out of 30 subjects (40%). Anaerobic bacteria were isolated only on the implant in 7 subjects, only on the homologous tooth in 3 subjects and both on the implant and the homologous tooth in 2 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Anaerobic bacteria were more abundantly present on implants than on homologous teeth. University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6238878/ /pubmed/30510295 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/3 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Papers Savić, Ines Bošnjak, Andrija Beader, Nataša Lovrić, Željka Salihagić, Adi Gašparac, Ivo Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation |
title | Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation |
title_full | Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation |
title_fullStr | Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation |
title_short | Anaerobic Bacteria in Implants and Homologous Teeth 2-14 Years after Implantation |
title_sort | anaerobic bacteria in implants and homologous teeth 2-14 years after implantation |
topic | Original Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510295 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT savicines anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation AT bosnjakandrija anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation AT beadernatasa anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation AT lovriczeljka anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation AT salihagicadi anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation AT gasparacivo anaerobicbacteriainimplantsandhomologousteeth214yearsafterimplantation |