Cargando…
Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits
PURPOSE: The Bayesian adaptive quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method with a 10-letter identification task provides an efficient CSF assessment. However, large populations are unfamiliar with letters and cannot benefit from this test. To overcome the barrier, we conducted this study. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.9 |
_version_ | 1783371480367628288 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Haiyan Wang, Chenxiao Cui, Rong He, Xianghang Shen, Menglu Lesmes, Luis Andres Lu, Zhong-Lin Qu, Jia Hou, Fang |
author_facet | Zheng, Haiyan Wang, Chenxiao Cui, Rong He, Xianghang Shen, Menglu Lesmes, Luis Andres Lu, Zhong-Lin Qu, Jia Hou, Fang |
author_sort | Zheng, Haiyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The Bayesian adaptive quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method with a 10-letter identification task provides an efficient CSF assessment. However, large populations are unfamiliar with letters and cannot benefit from this test. To overcome the barrier, we conducted this study. METHOD: A new font for digits (0∼9) was created. The digits were then filtered with a raised cosine filter, rescaled to different sizes to cover spatial frequencies from 0.5 to 16 cycles per degree (cpd), and used as stimuli in a 10-alternative forced choice (10AFC) digit identification task. With the 10AFC digit identification task, the CSFs of five young and five old observers were measured using the qCSF and Psi methods. The estimates from the latter served as reference. RESULTS: The new digit font showed significantly improved similarity structure, Levene's test, F(1, 88) = 6.36, P = 0.014. With the 10-digit identification task, the CSFs obtained with the qCSF method matched well with those obtained with the Psi method (root mean square error [RMSE] = 0.053 log10 units). With approximately 30 trials, the precision of the qCSF method reached 0.1 log10 units. With approximately 75 trials, the precision of the CSFs obtained with the qCSF was comparable to that of the CSFs measured by the Psi method in 150 trials. CONCLUSIONS: The qCSF with the 10 digit identification task is validated for both young and old observers. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The qCSF method with the 10-digit identification task provides an efficient and precise CSF test especially for people who are unfamiliar with letters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6238983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62389832018-11-26 Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits Zheng, Haiyan Wang, Chenxiao Cui, Rong He, Xianghang Shen, Menglu Lesmes, Luis Andres Lu, Zhong-Lin Qu, Jia Hou, Fang Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: The Bayesian adaptive quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method with a 10-letter identification task provides an efficient CSF assessment. However, large populations are unfamiliar with letters and cannot benefit from this test. To overcome the barrier, we conducted this study. METHOD: A new font for digits (0∼9) was created. The digits were then filtered with a raised cosine filter, rescaled to different sizes to cover spatial frequencies from 0.5 to 16 cycles per degree (cpd), and used as stimuli in a 10-alternative forced choice (10AFC) digit identification task. With the 10AFC digit identification task, the CSFs of five young and five old observers were measured using the qCSF and Psi methods. The estimates from the latter served as reference. RESULTS: The new digit font showed significantly improved similarity structure, Levene's test, F(1, 88) = 6.36, P = 0.014. With the 10-digit identification task, the CSFs obtained with the qCSF method matched well with those obtained with the Psi method (root mean square error [RMSE] = 0.053 log10 units). With approximately 30 trials, the precision of the qCSF method reached 0.1 log10 units. With approximately 75 trials, the precision of the CSFs obtained with the qCSF was comparable to that of the CSFs measured by the Psi method in 150 trials. CONCLUSIONS: The qCSF with the 10 digit identification task is validated for both young and old observers. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The qCSF method with the 10-digit identification task provides an efficient and precise CSF test especially for people who are unfamiliar with letters. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6238983/ /pubmed/30479880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.9 Text en Copyright 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Zheng, Haiyan Wang, Chenxiao Cui, Rong He, Xianghang Shen, Menglu Lesmes, Luis Andres Lu, Zhong-Lin Qu, Jia Hou, Fang Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits |
title | Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits |
title_full | Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits |
title_fullStr | Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits |
title_short | Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits |
title_sort | measuring the contrast sensitivity function using the qcsf method with 10 digits |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhenghaiyan measuringthecontrastsensitivityfunctionusingtheqcsfmethodwith10digits AT wangchenxiao measuringthecontrastsensitivityfunctionusingtheqcsfmethodwith10digits AT cuirong measuringthecontrastsensitivityfunctionusingtheqcsfmethodwith10digits AT hexianghang measuringthecontrastsensitivityfunctionusingtheqcsfmethodwith10digits AT shenmenglu measuringthecontrastsensitivityfunctionusingtheqcsfmethodwith10digits AT lesmesluisandres measuringthecontrastsensitivityfunctionusingtheqcsfmethodwith10digits AT luzhonglin measuringthecontrastsensitivityfunctionusingtheqcsfmethodwith10digits AT qujia measuringthecontrastsensitivityfunctionusingtheqcsfmethodwith10digits AT houfang measuringthecontrastsensitivityfunctionusingtheqcsfmethodwith10digits |