Cargando…

Surface mechanomyography and electromyography provide non-invasive indices of inspiratory muscle force and activation in healthy subjects

The current gold standard assessment of human inspiratory muscle function involves using invasive measures of transdiaphragmatic pressure (P(di)) or crural diaphragm electromyography (oesEMG(di)). Mechanomyography is a non-invasive measure of muscle vibration associated with muscle contraction. Surf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lozano-García, Manuel, Sarlabous, Leonardo, Moxham, John, Rafferty, Gerrard F., Torres, Abel, Jané, Raimon, Jolley, Caroline J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30446712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35024-z
Descripción
Sumario:The current gold standard assessment of human inspiratory muscle function involves using invasive measures of transdiaphragmatic pressure (P(di)) or crural diaphragm electromyography (oesEMG(di)). Mechanomyography is a non-invasive measure of muscle vibration associated with muscle contraction. Surface electromyogram and mechanomyogram, recorded transcutaneously using sensors placed over the lower intercostal spaces (sEMG(lic) and sMMG(lic) respectively), have been proposed to provide non-invasive indices of inspiratory muscle activation, but have not been directly compared to gold standard P(di) and oesEMG(di) measures during voluntary respiratory manoeuvres. To validate the non-invasive techniques, the relationships between P(di) and sMMG(lic), and between oesEMG(di) and sEMG(lic) were measured simultaneously in 12 healthy subjects during an incremental inspiratory threshold loading protocol. Myographic signals were analysed using fixed sample entropy (fSampEn), which is less influenced by cardiac artefacts than conventional root mean square. Strong correlations were observed between: mean P(di) and mean fSampEn |sMMG(lic)| (left, 0.76; right, 0.81), the time-integrals of the P(di) and fSampEn |sMMG(lic)| (left, 0.78; right, 0.83), and mean fSampEn oesEMG(di) and mean fSampEn sEMG(lic) (left, 0.84; right, 0.83). These findings suggest that sMMG(lic) and sEMG(lic) could provide useful non-invasive alternatives to P(di) and oesEMG(di) for the assessment of inspiratory muscle function in health and disease.