Cargando…

A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study

BACKGROUND: Electronic diaries are increasingly used in diverse disciplines to collect momentary data on experienced feelings, cognitions, behavior and social context in real life situations. Choices to be made for an effective and feasible design are however a challenge. Careful and detailed docume...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssens, Karin A. M., Bos, Elisabeth H., Rosmalen, Judith G. M., Wichers, Marieke C., Riese, Harriëtte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30445926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6
_version_ 1783371593031876608
author Janssens, Karin A. M.
Bos, Elisabeth H.
Rosmalen, Judith G. M.
Wichers, Marieke C.
Riese, Harriëtte
author_facet Janssens, Karin A. M.
Bos, Elisabeth H.
Rosmalen, Judith G. M.
Wichers, Marieke C.
Riese, Harriëtte
author_sort Janssens, Karin A. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electronic diaries are increasingly used in diverse disciplines to collect momentary data on experienced feelings, cognitions, behavior and social context in real life situations. Choices to be made for an effective and feasible design are however a challenge. Careful and detailed documentation of argumentation of choosing a particular design, as well as general guidelines on how to design such studies are largely lacking in scientific papers. This qualitative study provides a systematic overview of arguments for choosing a specific diary study design (e.g. time frame) in order to optimize future design decisions. METHODS: During the first data assessment round, 47 researchers experienced in diary research from twelve different countries participated. They gave a description of and arguments for choosing their diary design (i.e., study duration, measurement frequency, random or fixed assessment, momentary or retrospective assessment, allowed delay to respond to the beep). During the second round, 38 participants (81%) rated the importance of the different themes identified during the first assessment round for the different diary design topics. RESULTS: The rationales for diary design choices reported during the first round were mostly strongly related to the research question. The rationales were categorized into four overarching themes: nature of the variables, reliability, feasibility, and statistics. During the second round, all overarching themes were considered important for all diary design topics. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that no golden standard for the optimal design of a diary study exists since the design depends heavily upon the research question of the study. The findings of the current study are helpful to explicate and guide the specific choices that have to be made when designing a diary study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6240196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62401962018-11-26 A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study Janssens, Karin A. M. Bos, Elisabeth H. Rosmalen, Judith G. M. Wichers, Marieke C. Riese, Harriëtte BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Electronic diaries are increasingly used in diverse disciplines to collect momentary data on experienced feelings, cognitions, behavior and social context in real life situations. Choices to be made for an effective and feasible design are however a challenge. Careful and detailed documentation of argumentation of choosing a particular design, as well as general guidelines on how to design such studies are largely lacking in scientific papers. This qualitative study provides a systematic overview of arguments for choosing a specific diary study design (e.g. time frame) in order to optimize future design decisions. METHODS: During the first data assessment round, 47 researchers experienced in diary research from twelve different countries participated. They gave a description of and arguments for choosing their diary design (i.e., study duration, measurement frequency, random or fixed assessment, momentary or retrospective assessment, allowed delay to respond to the beep). During the second round, 38 participants (81%) rated the importance of the different themes identified during the first assessment round for the different diary design topics. RESULTS: The rationales for diary design choices reported during the first round were mostly strongly related to the research question. The rationales were categorized into four overarching themes: nature of the variables, reliability, feasibility, and statistics. During the second round, all overarching themes were considered important for all diary design topics. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that no golden standard for the optimal design of a diary study exists since the design depends heavily upon the research question of the study. The findings of the current study are helpful to explicate and guide the specific choices that have to be made when designing a diary study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6240196/ /pubmed/30445926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Janssens, Karin A. M.
Bos, Elisabeth H.
Rosmalen, Judith G. M.
Wichers, Marieke C.
Riese, Harriëtte
A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study
title A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study
title_full A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study
title_fullStr A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study
title_short A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study
title_sort qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30445926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6
work_keys_str_mv AT janssenskarinam aqualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy
AT boselisabethh aqualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy
AT rosmalenjudithgm aqualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy
AT wichersmariekec aqualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy
AT rieseharriette aqualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy
AT janssenskarinam qualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy
AT boselisabethh qualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy
AT rosmalenjudithgm qualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy
AT wichersmariekec qualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy
AT rieseharriette qualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy