Cargando…
A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study
BACKGROUND: Electronic diaries are increasingly used in diverse disciplines to collect momentary data on experienced feelings, cognitions, behavior and social context in real life situations. Choices to be made for an effective and feasible design are however a challenge. Careful and detailed docume...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30445926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6 |
_version_ | 1783371593031876608 |
---|---|
author | Janssens, Karin A. M. Bos, Elisabeth H. Rosmalen, Judith G. M. Wichers, Marieke C. Riese, Harriëtte |
author_facet | Janssens, Karin A. M. Bos, Elisabeth H. Rosmalen, Judith G. M. Wichers, Marieke C. Riese, Harriëtte |
author_sort | Janssens, Karin A. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electronic diaries are increasingly used in diverse disciplines to collect momentary data on experienced feelings, cognitions, behavior and social context in real life situations. Choices to be made for an effective and feasible design are however a challenge. Careful and detailed documentation of argumentation of choosing a particular design, as well as general guidelines on how to design such studies are largely lacking in scientific papers. This qualitative study provides a systematic overview of arguments for choosing a specific diary study design (e.g. time frame) in order to optimize future design decisions. METHODS: During the first data assessment round, 47 researchers experienced in diary research from twelve different countries participated. They gave a description of and arguments for choosing their diary design (i.e., study duration, measurement frequency, random or fixed assessment, momentary or retrospective assessment, allowed delay to respond to the beep). During the second round, 38 participants (81%) rated the importance of the different themes identified during the first assessment round for the different diary design topics. RESULTS: The rationales for diary design choices reported during the first round were mostly strongly related to the research question. The rationales were categorized into four overarching themes: nature of the variables, reliability, feasibility, and statistics. During the second round, all overarching themes were considered important for all diary design topics. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that no golden standard for the optimal design of a diary study exists since the design depends heavily upon the research question of the study. The findings of the current study are helpful to explicate and guide the specific choices that have to be made when designing a diary study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6240196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62401962018-11-26 A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study Janssens, Karin A. M. Bos, Elisabeth H. Rosmalen, Judith G. M. Wichers, Marieke C. Riese, Harriëtte BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Electronic diaries are increasingly used in diverse disciplines to collect momentary data on experienced feelings, cognitions, behavior and social context in real life situations. Choices to be made for an effective and feasible design are however a challenge. Careful and detailed documentation of argumentation of choosing a particular design, as well as general guidelines on how to design such studies are largely lacking in scientific papers. This qualitative study provides a systematic overview of arguments for choosing a specific diary study design (e.g. time frame) in order to optimize future design decisions. METHODS: During the first data assessment round, 47 researchers experienced in diary research from twelve different countries participated. They gave a description of and arguments for choosing their diary design (i.e., study duration, measurement frequency, random or fixed assessment, momentary or retrospective assessment, allowed delay to respond to the beep). During the second round, 38 participants (81%) rated the importance of the different themes identified during the first assessment round for the different diary design topics. RESULTS: The rationales for diary design choices reported during the first round were mostly strongly related to the research question. The rationales were categorized into four overarching themes: nature of the variables, reliability, feasibility, and statistics. During the second round, all overarching themes were considered important for all diary design topics. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that no golden standard for the optimal design of a diary study exists since the design depends heavily upon the research question of the study. The findings of the current study are helpful to explicate and guide the specific choices that have to be made when designing a diary study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6240196/ /pubmed/30445926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Janssens, Karin A. M. Bos, Elisabeth H. Rosmalen, Judith G. M. Wichers, Marieke C. Riese, Harriëtte A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study |
title | A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study |
title_full | A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study |
title_fullStr | A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study |
title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study |
title_short | A qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study |
title_sort | qualitative approach to guide choices for designing a diary study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30445926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0579-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janssenskarinam aqualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy AT boselisabethh aqualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy AT rosmalenjudithgm aqualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy AT wichersmariekec aqualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy AT rieseharriette aqualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy AT janssenskarinam qualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy AT boselisabethh qualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy AT rosmalenjudithgm qualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy AT wichersmariekec qualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy AT rieseharriette qualitativeapproachtoguidechoicesfordesigningadiarystudy |