Cargando…

Higher PEEP improves outcomes in ARDS patients with clinically objective positive oxygenation response to PEEP: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains high. These patients require mechanical ventilation strategies that include high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). It remains controversial whether high PEEP can improve outcomes for ARDS patients, espec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Lanqi, Xie, Jianfeng, Huang, Yingzi, Pan, Chun, Yang, Yi, Qiu, Haibo, Liu, Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30447683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0631-4
_version_ 1783371614874763264
author Guo, Lanqi
Xie, Jianfeng
Huang, Yingzi
Pan, Chun
Yang, Yi
Qiu, Haibo
Liu, Ling
author_facet Guo, Lanqi
Xie, Jianfeng
Huang, Yingzi
Pan, Chun
Yang, Yi
Qiu, Haibo
Liu, Ling
author_sort Guo, Lanqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains high. These patients require mechanical ventilation strategies that include high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). It remains controversial whether high PEEP can improve outcomes for ARDS patients, especially patients who show improvement in oxygenation in response to PEEP. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effects of high PEEP on ARDS patients. METHODS: We electronically searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science databases from January 1990 to December 2017. Meta-analyses of the effects of PEEP on survival in adults with ARDS were conducted using the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: A total of 3612 patients from nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. There were 1794 and 1818 patients in the high and low PEEP groups, respectively. Hospital mortality showed no significant difference between the high and low PEEP groups (RR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.07; P = 0.26). Similar results were found for 28-d mortality (RR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.07; P = 0.19) and ICU mortality (RR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.07; P = 0.15). The risk of clinically objectified barotrauma was not significantly different between the high and low PEEP groups (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.74 to 2.09, P = 0.41). In the subgroup of ARDS patients who responded to increased PEEP by improved oxygenation (from 6 RCTs), high PEEP significantly reduced hospital mortality (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98; P = 0.03), ICU mortality (RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.98; P = 0.04),but the 28-d mortality was not decreased(RR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.01; P = 0.07). For ARDS patients in the low PEEP group who received a PEEP level lower than 10 cmH(2)O (from 6 RCTs), ICU mortality was lower in the high PEEP group than the low PEEP group (RR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.94; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For ARDS patients who responded to increased PEEP by improved oxygenation, high PEEP could reduce hospital mortality, ICU mortality and 28-d mortality. High PEEP does not increase the risk of clinically objectified barotrauma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0631-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6240288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62402882018-11-23 Higher PEEP improves outcomes in ARDS patients with clinically objective positive oxygenation response to PEEP: a systematic review and meta-analysis Guo, Lanqi Xie, Jianfeng Huang, Yingzi Pan, Chun Yang, Yi Qiu, Haibo Liu, Ling BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains high. These patients require mechanical ventilation strategies that include high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). It remains controversial whether high PEEP can improve outcomes for ARDS patients, especially patients who show improvement in oxygenation in response to PEEP. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effects of high PEEP on ARDS patients. METHODS: We electronically searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science databases from January 1990 to December 2017. Meta-analyses of the effects of PEEP on survival in adults with ARDS were conducted using the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: A total of 3612 patients from nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. There were 1794 and 1818 patients in the high and low PEEP groups, respectively. Hospital mortality showed no significant difference between the high and low PEEP groups (RR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.07; P = 0.26). Similar results were found for 28-d mortality (RR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.07; P = 0.19) and ICU mortality (RR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.07; P = 0.15). The risk of clinically objectified barotrauma was not significantly different between the high and low PEEP groups (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.74 to 2.09, P = 0.41). In the subgroup of ARDS patients who responded to increased PEEP by improved oxygenation (from 6 RCTs), high PEEP significantly reduced hospital mortality (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98; P = 0.03), ICU mortality (RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.98; P = 0.04),but the 28-d mortality was not decreased(RR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.01; P = 0.07). For ARDS patients in the low PEEP group who received a PEEP level lower than 10 cmH(2)O (from 6 RCTs), ICU mortality was lower in the high PEEP group than the low PEEP group (RR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.94; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For ARDS patients who responded to increased PEEP by improved oxygenation, high PEEP could reduce hospital mortality, ICU mortality and 28-d mortality. High PEEP does not increase the risk of clinically objectified barotrauma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0631-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6240288/ /pubmed/30447683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0631-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guo, Lanqi
Xie, Jianfeng
Huang, Yingzi
Pan, Chun
Yang, Yi
Qiu, Haibo
Liu, Ling
Higher PEEP improves outcomes in ARDS patients with clinically objective positive oxygenation response to PEEP: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Higher PEEP improves outcomes in ARDS patients with clinically objective positive oxygenation response to PEEP: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Higher PEEP improves outcomes in ARDS patients with clinically objective positive oxygenation response to PEEP: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Higher PEEP improves outcomes in ARDS patients with clinically objective positive oxygenation response to PEEP: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Higher PEEP improves outcomes in ARDS patients with clinically objective positive oxygenation response to PEEP: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Higher PEEP improves outcomes in ARDS patients with clinically objective positive oxygenation response to PEEP: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort higher peep improves outcomes in ards patients with clinically objective positive oxygenation response to peep: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30447683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0631-4
work_keys_str_mv AT guolanqi higherpeepimprovesoutcomesinardspatientswithclinicallyobjectivepositiveoxygenationresponsetopeepasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiejianfeng higherpeepimprovesoutcomesinardspatientswithclinicallyobjectivepositiveoxygenationresponsetopeepasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangyingzi higherpeepimprovesoutcomesinardspatientswithclinicallyobjectivepositiveoxygenationresponsetopeepasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT panchun higherpeepimprovesoutcomesinardspatientswithclinicallyobjectivepositiveoxygenationresponsetopeepasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangyi higherpeepimprovesoutcomesinardspatientswithclinicallyobjectivepositiveoxygenationresponsetopeepasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qiuhaibo higherpeepimprovesoutcomesinardspatientswithclinicallyobjectivepositiveoxygenationresponsetopeepasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuling higherpeepimprovesoutcomesinardspatientswithclinicallyobjectivepositiveoxygenationresponsetopeepasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis