Cargando…

The prone position in healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia – a pilot study

BACKGROUND: The prone position is rarely used in medical settings in pregnancy. There is no published information about the prone position in women with preeclampsia. This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of the prone position in pregnant women, and the short-term effect of the prone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennis, Alicia T., Hardy, Liesel, Leeton, Liz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30445912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2073-x
_version_ 1783371617773027328
author Dennis, Alicia T.
Hardy, Liesel
Leeton, Liz
author_facet Dennis, Alicia T.
Hardy, Liesel
Leeton, Liz
author_sort Dennis, Alicia T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prone position is rarely used in medical settings in pregnancy. There is no published information about the prone position in women with preeclampsia. This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of the prone position in pregnant women, and the short-term effect of the prone position on blood pressure (BP) in term healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia. METHODS: After ethics approval, written consent and trial registration (ACTRN:12615000160538 registered 18/02/2015, date of first participant enrolled 03/03/2015), 50 healthy term pregnant women and 15 women with preeclampsia had BP, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), fetal heart rate (FHR) and comfort levels measured in two positions: left lateral, and prone. Measurements were after five minutes rest in each position. RESULTS: Mean ± SD age, gestation and body mass index for healthy pregnant women was 33 ± 4.1 years, 38 ± 1.0 weeks and 27 ± 3.2 kg.m(− 2) and for women with preeclampsia was 32 ± 4.7 years, 36 ± 3.4 weeks, 31 ± 5.6 kg.m(− 2) respectively. No clinically significant changes occurred in healthy pregnant women in the prone position. Systolic BP was reduced in the prone position in women with preeclampsia (P = 0.019, mean difference − 6.6 mmHg, 95% confidence interval − 11.9 to − 1.3 mmHg). 33% of women with preeclampsia experienced a 10 mmHg or greater reduction in systolic BP in the prone position. 42% of healthy pregnant women and 47% of women with preeclampsia preferred the prone position to lateral. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine the prone position in women with preeclampsia. For short periods of time the prone position is feasible and comfortable in pregnant women including those at term. The prone position may reduce systolic BP in women with preeclampsia without obvious adverse effects. Larger studies with women lying for longer periods in the prone position are required. Pregnancy should not be a contraindication to the prone position for short periods of time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN:12615000160538 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2073-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6240306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62403062018-11-23 The prone position in healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia – a pilot study Dennis, Alicia T. Hardy, Liesel Leeton, Liz BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The prone position is rarely used in medical settings in pregnancy. There is no published information about the prone position in women with preeclampsia. This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of the prone position in pregnant women, and the short-term effect of the prone position on blood pressure (BP) in term healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia. METHODS: After ethics approval, written consent and trial registration (ACTRN:12615000160538 registered 18/02/2015, date of first participant enrolled 03/03/2015), 50 healthy term pregnant women and 15 women with preeclampsia had BP, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), fetal heart rate (FHR) and comfort levels measured in two positions: left lateral, and prone. Measurements were after five minutes rest in each position. RESULTS: Mean ± SD age, gestation and body mass index for healthy pregnant women was 33 ± 4.1 years, 38 ± 1.0 weeks and 27 ± 3.2 kg.m(− 2) and for women with preeclampsia was 32 ± 4.7 years, 36 ± 3.4 weeks, 31 ± 5.6 kg.m(− 2) respectively. No clinically significant changes occurred in healthy pregnant women in the prone position. Systolic BP was reduced in the prone position in women with preeclampsia (P = 0.019, mean difference − 6.6 mmHg, 95% confidence interval − 11.9 to − 1.3 mmHg). 33% of women with preeclampsia experienced a 10 mmHg or greater reduction in systolic BP in the prone position. 42% of healthy pregnant women and 47% of women with preeclampsia preferred the prone position to lateral. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine the prone position in women with preeclampsia. For short periods of time the prone position is feasible and comfortable in pregnant women including those at term. The prone position may reduce systolic BP in women with preeclampsia without obvious adverse effects. Larger studies with women lying for longer periods in the prone position are required. Pregnancy should not be a contraindication to the prone position for short periods of time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN:12615000160538 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2073-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6240306/ /pubmed/30445912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2073-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dennis, Alicia T.
Hardy, Liesel
Leeton, Liz
The prone position in healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia – a pilot study
title The prone position in healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia – a pilot study
title_full The prone position in healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia – a pilot study
title_fullStr The prone position in healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia – a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed The prone position in healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia – a pilot study
title_short The prone position in healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia – a pilot study
title_sort prone position in healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia – a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30445912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2073-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dennisaliciat thepronepositioninhealthypregnantwomenandinwomenwithpreeclampsiaapilotstudy
AT hardyliesel thepronepositioninhealthypregnantwomenandinwomenwithpreeclampsiaapilotstudy
AT leetonliz thepronepositioninhealthypregnantwomenandinwomenwithpreeclampsiaapilotstudy
AT dennisaliciat pronepositioninhealthypregnantwomenandinwomenwithpreeclampsiaapilotstudy
AT hardyliesel pronepositioninhealthypregnantwomenandinwomenwithpreeclampsiaapilotstudy
AT leetonliz pronepositioninhealthypregnantwomenandinwomenwithpreeclampsiaapilotstudy