Cargando…
Skin bacterial diversity is higher on lizards than sympatric frogs in tropical Australia
Animal skin acts as a barrier between the organism and its environment and provides the first line of defense against invading pathogens. Thus, skin surfaces harbor communities of microbes that are interacting with both the host and its environment. Amphibian skin bacteria form distinct communities...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479906 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5960 |
_version_ | 1783371623531806720 |
---|---|
author | Weitzman, Chava L. Gibb, Karen Christian, Keith |
author_facet | Weitzman, Chava L. Gibb, Karen Christian, Keith |
author_sort | Weitzman, Chava L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Animal skin acts as a barrier between the organism and its environment and provides the first line of defense against invading pathogens. Thus, skin surfaces harbor communities of microbes that are interacting with both the host and its environment. Amphibian skin bacteria form distinct communities closely tied to their host species, but few studies have compared bacterial communities between amphibians and other, non-amphibian sympatric animals. Notably, skin microbes on reptiles have gained little attention. We used next-generation sequencing technology to describe bacterial communities on the skin of three lizard species and compared them to bacteria on six cohabiting frog species in the Northern Territory of Australia. We found bacterial communities had higher richness and diversity on lizards than frogs, with different community composition between reptiles and amphibians and among species. Core bacteria on the three lizard species overlapped by over 100 operational taxonomic units. The bacterial communities were similar within species of frogs and lizards, but the communities tended to be more similar between lizard species than between frog species and when comparing lizards with frogs. The diverse bacteria found on lizards invites further questions on how and how well reptiles interact with microorganisms through their scaly skin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6240339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62403392018-11-26 Skin bacterial diversity is higher on lizards than sympatric frogs in tropical Australia Weitzman, Chava L. Gibb, Karen Christian, Keith PeerJ Biodiversity Animal skin acts as a barrier between the organism and its environment and provides the first line of defense against invading pathogens. Thus, skin surfaces harbor communities of microbes that are interacting with both the host and its environment. Amphibian skin bacteria form distinct communities closely tied to their host species, but few studies have compared bacterial communities between amphibians and other, non-amphibian sympatric animals. Notably, skin microbes on reptiles have gained little attention. We used next-generation sequencing technology to describe bacterial communities on the skin of three lizard species and compared them to bacteria on six cohabiting frog species in the Northern Territory of Australia. We found bacterial communities had higher richness and diversity on lizards than frogs, with different community composition between reptiles and amphibians and among species. Core bacteria on the three lizard species overlapped by over 100 operational taxonomic units. The bacterial communities were similar within species of frogs and lizards, but the communities tended to be more similar between lizard species than between frog species and when comparing lizards with frogs. The diverse bacteria found on lizards invites further questions on how and how well reptiles interact with microorganisms through their scaly skin. PeerJ Inc. 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6240339/ /pubmed/30479906 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5960 Text en ©2018 Weitzman et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Biodiversity Weitzman, Chava L. Gibb, Karen Christian, Keith Skin bacterial diversity is higher on lizards than sympatric frogs in tropical Australia |
title | Skin bacterial diversity is higher on lizards than sympatric frogs in tropical Australia |
title_full | Skin bacterial diversity is higher on lizards than sympatric frogs in tropical Australia |
title_fullStr | Skin bacterial diversity is higher on lizards than sympatric frogs in tropical Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Skin bacterial diversity is higher on lizards than sympatric frogs in tropical Australia |
title_short | Skin bacterial diversity is higher on lizards than sympatric frogs in tropical Australia |
title_sort | skin bacterial diversity is higher on lizards than sympatric frogs in tropical australia |
topic | Biodiversity |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479906 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weitzmanchaval skinbacterialdiversityishigheronlizardsthansympatricfrogsintropicalaustralia AT gibbkaren skinbacterialdiversityishigheronlizardsthansympatricfrogsintropicalaustralia AT christiankeith skinbacterialdiversityishigheronlizardsthansympatricfrogsintropicalaustralia |