Cargando…

Do Prophylactic Knee Braces Protect the Knee Against Impacts or Tibial Moments? An In Vitro Multisensory Study

BACKGROUND: Knee braces are prescribed by physicians to protect the knee from various loading conditions during sports or after surgery, even though the effect of bracing for various loading scenarios remains unclear. PURPOSE: To extensively investigate whether bracing protects the knee against impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hacker, Steffen Paul, Schall, Florian, Niemeyer, Frank, Wolf, Nicolas, Ignatius, Anita, Dürselen, Lutz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30480009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118805399
_version_ 1783371721685860352
author Hacker, Steffen Paul
Schall, Florian
Niemeyer, Frank
Wolf, Nicolas
Ignatius, Anita
Dürselen, Lutz
author_facet Hacker, Steffen Paul
Schall, Florian
Niemeyer, Frank
Wolf, Nicolas
Ignatius, Anita
Dürselen, Lutz
author_sort Hacker, Steffen Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knee braces are prescribed by physicians to protect the knee from various loading conditions during sports or after surgery, even though the effect of bracing for various loading scenarios remains unclear. PURPOSE: To extensively investigate whether bracing protects the knee against impacts from the lateral, medial, anterior, or posterior directions at different heights as well as against tibial moments. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight limb specimens were exposed to (1) subcritical impacts from the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior directions at 3 heights (center of the joint line and 100 mm inferior and superior) and (2) internal/external torques. Using a prophylactic brace, both scenarios were conducted under braced and unbraced conditions with moderate muscle loads and intact soft tissue. The change in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) strain, joint acceleration in the tibial and femoral bones (for impacts only), and joint kinematics were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Bracing reduced joint acceleration for medial and lateral center impacts. The ACL strain change was decreased for medial superior impacts and increased for anterior inferior impacts. Impacts from the posterior direction had substantially less effect on the ACL strain change and joint acceleration than anterior impacts. Bracing had no effect on the ACL strain change or kinematics under internal or external moments. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the effect of bracing during impacts depends on the direction and height of the impact and is partly positive, negative, or neutral and that soft tissue absorbs impact energy. An effect during internal or external torque was not detected. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Bracing in contact sports with many lateral or medial impacts might be beneficial, whereas athletes who play sports with rotational moments on the knee or anterior impacts may be safer without a brace.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6240970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62409702018-11-26 Do Prophylactic Knee Braces Protect the Knee Against Impacts or Tibial Moments? An In Vitro Multisensory Study Hacker, Steffen Paul Schall, Florian Niemeyer, Frank Wolf, Nicolas Ignatius, Anita Dürselen, Lutz Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Knee braces are prescribed by physicians to protect the knee from various loading conditions during sports or after surgery, even though the effect of bracing for various loading scenarios remains unclear. PURPOSE: To extensively investigate whether bracing protects the knee against impacts from the lateral, medial, anterior, or posterior directions at different heights as well as against tibial moments. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight limb specimens were exposed to (1) subcritical impacts from the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior directions at 3 heights (center of the joint line and 100 mm inferior and superior) and (2) internal/external torques. Using a prophylactic brace, both scenarios were conducted under braced and unbraced conditions with moderate muscle loads and intact soft tissue. The change in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) strain, joint acceleration in the tibial and femoral bones (for impacts only), and joint kinematics were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Bracing reduced joint acceleration for medial and lateral center impacts. The ACL strain change was decreased for medial superior impacts and increased for anterior inferior impacts. Impacts from the posterior direction had substantially less effect on the ACL strain change and joint acceleration than anterior impacts. Bracing had no effect on the ACL strain change or kinematics under internal or external moments. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the effect of bracing during impacts depends on the direction and height of the impact and is partly positive, negative, or neutral and that soft tissue absorbs impact energy. An effect during internal or external torque was not detected. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Bracing in contact sports with many lateral or medial impacts might be beneficial, whereas athletes who play sports with rotational moments on the knee or anterior impacts may be safer without a brace. SAGE Publications 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6240970/ /pubmed/30480009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118805399 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Hacker, Steffen Paul
Schall, Florian
Niemeyer, Frank
Wolf, Nicolas
Ignatius, Anita
Dürselen, Lutz
Do Prophylactic Knee Braces Protect the Knee Against Impacts or Tibial Moments? An In Vitro Multisensory Study
title Do Prophylactic Knee Braces Protect the Knee Against Impacts or Tibial Moments? An In Vitro Multisensory Study
title_full Do Prophylactic Knee Braces Protect the Knee Against Impacts or Tibial Moments? An In Vitro Multisensory Study
title_fullStr Do Prophylactic Knee Braces Protect the Knee Against Impacts or Tibial Moments? An In Vitro Multisensory Study
title_full_unstemmed Do Prophylactic Knee Braces Protect the Knee Against Impacts or Tibial Moments? An In Vitro Multisensory Study
title_short Do Prophylactic Knee Braces Protect the Knee Against Impacts or Tibial Moments? An In Vitro Multisensory Study
title_sort do prophylactic knee braces protect the knee against impacts or tibial moments? an in vitro multisensory study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6240970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30480009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118805399
work_keys_str_mv AT hackersteffenpaul doprophylactickneebracesprotectthekneeagainstimpactsortibialmomentsaninvitromultisensorystudy
AT schallflorian doprophylactickneebracesprotectthekneeagainstimpactsortibialmomentsaninvitromultisensorystudy
AT niemeyerfrank doprophylactickneebracesprotectthekneeagainstimpactsortibialmomentsaninvitromultisensorystudy
AT wolfnicolas doprophylactickneebracesprotectthekneeagainstimpactsortibialmomentsaninvitromultisensorystudy
AT ignatiusanita doprophylactickneebracesprotectthekneeagainstimpactsortibialmomentsaninvitromultisensorystudy
AT durselenlutz doprophylactickneebracesprotectthekneeagainstimpactsortibialmomentsaninvitromultisensorystudy