Cargando…
An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation
Cells are under the influence of multiple forms of mechanical stimulation in vivo. For example, a cell is subjected to mechanical forces from tissue stiffness, shear and tensile stress and transient applied strain. Significant progress has been made in understanding the cellular mechanotransduction...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6241134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30427911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207490 |
_version_ | 1783371741120167936 |
---|---|
author | Indra, Indrajyoti Gasparski, Alexander N. Beningo, Karen A. |
author_facet | Indra, Indrajyoti Gasparski, Alexander N. Beningo, Karen A. |
author_sort | Indra, Indrajyoti |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cells are under the influence of multiple forms of mechanical stimulation in vivo. For example, a cell is subjected to mechanical forces from tissue stiffness, shear and tensile stress and transient applied strain. Significant progress has been made in understanding the cellular mechanotransduction mechanisms in response to a single mechanical parameter. However, our knowledge of how a cell responds to multiple mechanical inputs is currently limited. In this study, we have tested the cellular response to the simultaneous application of two mechanical inputs: substrate compliance and transient tugging. Our results suggest that cells within a multicellular spheroid will restrict their response to a single mechanical input at a time and when provided with two mechanical inputs simultaneously, one will dominate. In normal and non-metastatic mammary epithelial cells, we found that they respond to applied stimulation and will override substrate compliance cues in favor of the applied mechanical stimulus. Surprisingly, however, metastatic mammary epithelial cells remain non-responsive to both mechanical cues. Our results suggest that, within our assay system, metastatic progression may involve the down-regulation of multiple mechanotransduction pathways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6241134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62411342018-12-01 An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation Indra, Indrajyoti Gasparski, Alexander N. Beningo, Karen A. PLoS One Research Article Cells are under the influence of multiple forms of mechanical stimulation in vivo. For example, a cell is subjected to mechanical forces from tissue stiffness, shear and tensile stress and transient applied strain. Significant progress has been made in understanding the cellular mechanotransduction mechanisms in response to a single mechanical parameter. However, our knowledge of how a cell responds to multiple mechanical inputs is currently limited. In this study, we have tested the cellular response to the simultaneous application of two mechanical inputs: substrate compliance and transient tugging. Our results suggest that cells within a multicellular spheroid will restrict their response to a single mechanical input at a time and when provided with two mechanical inputs simultaneously, one will dominate. In normal and non-metastatic mammary epithelial cells, we found that they respond to applied stimulation and will override substrate compliance cues in favor of the applied mechanical stimulus. Surprisingly, however, metastatic mammary epithelial cells remain non-responsive to both mechanical cues. Our results suggest that, within our assay system, metastatic progression may involve the down-regulation of multiple mechanotransduction pathways. Public Library of Science 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6241134/ /pubmed/30427911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207490 Text en © 2018 Indra et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Indra, Indrajyoti Gasparski, Alexander N. Beningo, Karen A. An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation |
title | An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation |
title_full | An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation |
title_fullStr | An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation |
title_short | An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation |
title_sort | in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6241134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30427911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT indraindrajyoti aninvitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation AT gasparskialexandern aninvitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation AT beningokarena aninvitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation AT indraindrajyoti invitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation AT gasparskialexandern invitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation AT beningokarena invitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation |