Cargando…

Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study

AIM: To evaluate, with three-dimensional analysis, the effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after maxillary molar extraction in reducing alveolar bone resorption and maxillary sinus pneumatization when compared to unassisted socket healing. METHODS: Patients were included in the study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lombardi, Teresa, Bernardello, Fabio, Berton, Federico, Porrelli, Davide, Rapani, Antonio, Camurri Piloni, Alvise, Fiorillo, Luca, Di Lenarda, Roberto, Stacchi, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6241373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30519592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9352130
_version_ 1783371770420527104
author Lombardi, Teresa
Bernardello, Fabio
Berton, Federico
Porrelli, Davide
Rapani, Antonio
Camurri Piloni, Alvise
Fiorillo, Luca
Di Lenarda, Roberto
Stacchi, Claudio
author_facet Lombardi, Teresa
Bernardello, Fabio
Berton, Federico
Porrelli, Davide
Rapani, Antonio
Camurri Piloni, Alvise
Fiorillo, Luca
Di Lenarda, Roberto
Stacchi, Claudio
author_sort Lombardi, Teresa
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate, with three-dimensional analysis, the effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after maxillary molar extraction in reducing alveolar bone resorption and maxillary sinus pneumatization when compared to unassisted socket healing. METHODS: Patients were included in the study following inclusion criteria and underwent minimally traumatic maxillary molar extraction followed by ARP using synthetic nanohydroxyapatite (Fisiograft Bone, Ghimas, Italy) (test group) or unassisted socket healing (control group). Cone-beam computerized tomographies (CBCT) were performed immediately after tooth extraction (T0) and 6 months postoperatively (T1). CBCTs were superimposed by using a specific software (Amira, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and the following items were analyzed in both groups: (i) postextractive maxillary sinus floor expansion in coronal direction and (ii) postextractive alveolar bone dimensional changes (both vertical and horizontal). All data were tested for normality and equality of variance and subsequently analyzed by independent samples T-test and Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated by three centers and twenty-six (test n=13; control n=13) were included in the final analysis. Mean sinus pneumatization at T1 was 0.69±0.48 mm in the test group and 1.04±0.67 mm in the control group (p=0.15). Mean vertical reduction of the alveolar bone at T1 was 1.62±0.49 mm in the test group and 2.01±0.84 mm in the control group (p=0.08). Mean horizontal resorption of crestal bone at T1 was 2.73±1.68 mm in test group and 3.63±2.24 mm in control group (p=0.24). CONCLUSIONS: It could be suggested that ARP performed after maxillary molar extraction may reduce the entity of sinus pneumatization and alveolar bone resorption, compared to unassisted socket healing. This technique could decrease the necessity of advanced regenerative procedures prior to dental implant placement in posterior maxilla.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6241373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62413732018-12-05 Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study Lombardi, Teresa Bernardello, Fabio Berton, Federico Porrelli, Davide Rapani, Antonio Camurri Piloni, Alvise Fiorillo, Luca Di Lenarda, Roberto Stacchi, Claudio Biomed Res Int Research Article AIM: To evaluate, with three-dimensional analysis, the effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after maxillary molar extraction in reducing alveolar bone resorption and maxillary sinus pneumatization when compared to unassisted socket healing. METHODS: Patients were included in the study following inclusion criteria and underwent minimally traumatic maxillary molar extraction followed by ARP using synthetic nanohydroxyapatite (Fisiograft Bone, Ghimas, Italy) (test group) or unassisted socket healing (control group). Cone-beam computerized tomographies (CBCT) were performed immediately after tooth extraction (T0) and 6 months postoperatively (T1). CBCTs were superimposed by using a specific software (Amira, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and the following items were analyzed in both groups: (i) postextractive maxillary sinus floor expansion in coronal direction and (ii) postextractive alveolar bone dimensional changes (both vertical and horizontal). All data were tested for normality and equality of variance and subsequently analyzed by independent samples T-test and Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated by three centers and twenty-six (test n=13; control n=13) were included in the final analysis. Mean sinus pneumatization at T1 was 0.69±0.48 mm in the test group and 1.04±0.67 mm in the control group (p=0.15). Mean vertical reduction of the alveolar bone at T1 was 1.62±0.49 mm in the test group and 2.01±0.84 mm in the control group (p=0.08). Mean horizontal resorption of crestal bone at T1 was 2.73±1.68 mm in test group and 3.63±2.24 mm in control group (p=0.24). CONCLUSIONS: It could be suggested that ARP performed after maxillary molar extraction may reduce the entity of sinus pneumatization and alveolar bone resorption, compared to unassisted socket healing. This technique could decrease the necessity of advanced regenerative procedures prior to dental implant placement in posterior maxilla. Hindawi 2018-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6241373/ /pubmed/30519592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9352130 Text en Copyright © 2018 Teresa Lombardi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lombardi, Teresa
Bernardello, Fabio
Berton, Federico
Porrelli, Davide
Rapani, Antonio
Camurri Piloni, Alvise
Fiorillo, Luca
Di Lenarda, Roberto
Stacchi, Claudio
Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study
title Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study
title_full Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study
title_fullStr Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study
title_short Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study
title_sort efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation after maxillary molar extraction in reducing crestal bone resorption and sinus pneumatization: a multicenter prospective case-control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6241373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30519592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9352130
work_keys_str_mv AT lombarditeresa efficacyofalveolarridgepreservationaftermaxillarymolarextractioninreducingcrestalboneresorptionandsinuspneumatizationamulticenterprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT bernardellofabio efficacyofalveolarridgepreservationaftermaxillarymolarextractioninreducingcrestalboneresorptionandsinuspneumatizationamulticenterprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT bertonfederico efficacyofalveolarridgepreservationaftermaxillarymolarextractioninreducingcrestalboneresorptionandsinuspneumatizationamulticenterprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT porrellidavide efficacyofalveolarridgepreservationaftermaxillarymolarextractioninreducingcrestalboneresorptionandsinuspneumatizationamulticenterprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT rapaniantonio efficacyofalveolarridgepreservationaftermaxillarymolarextractioninreducingcrestalboneresorptionandsinuspneumatizationamulticenterprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT camurripilonialvise efficacyofalveolarridgepreservationaftermaxillarymolarextractioninreducingcrestalboneresorptionandsinuspneumatizationamulticenterprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT fiorilloluca efficacyofalveolarridgepreservationaftermaxillarymolarextractioninreducingcrestalboneresorptionandsinuspneumatizationamulticenterprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT dilenardaroberto efficacyofalveolarridgepreservationaftermaxillarymolarextractioninreducingcrestalboneresorptionandsinuspneumatizationamulticenterprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT stacchiclaudio efficacyofalveolarridgepreservationaftermaxillarymolarextractioninreducingcrestalboneresorptionandsinuspneumatizationamulticenterprospectivecasecontrolstudy