Cargando…

Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations

We examined mental time travel reflected onto individuals’ utterances in real-life conversations using a naturalistic observation method: Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR, a portable audio recorder that periodically and unobtrusively records snippets of ambient sounds and speech). We introduce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demiray, Burcu, Mehl, Matthias R., Martin, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02160
_version_ 1783371897556172800
author Demiray, Burcu
Mehl, Matthias R.
Martin, Mike
author_facet Demiray, Burcu
Mehl, Matthias R.
Martin, Mike
author_sort Demiray, Burcu
collection PubMed
description We examined mental time travel reflected onto individuals’ utterances in real-life conversations using a naturalistic observation method: Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR, a portable audio recorder that periodically and unobtrusively records snippets of ambient sounds and speech). We introduced the term conversational time travel and examined, for the first time, how much individuals talked about their personal past versus personal future in real life. Study 1 included 9,010 sound files collected from 51 American adults who carried the EAR over 1 weekend and were recorded every 9 min for 50 s. Study 2 included 23,103 sound files from 33 young and 48 healthy older adults from Switzerland who carried the EAR for 4 days (2 weekdays and 1 weekend, counterbalanced). 30-s recordings occurred randomly throughout the day. We developed a new coding scheme for conversational time travel: We listened to all sound files and coded each file for whether the participant was talking or not. Those sound files that included participant speech were also coded in terms of their temporal focus (e.g., past, future, present, time-independent) and autobiographical nature (i.e., about the self, about others). We, first, validated our coding scheme using the text analysis tool, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Next, we compared the percentages of past- and future-oriented utterances about the self (to tap onto conversational time travel). Results were consistent across all samples and showed that participants talked about their personal past two to three times as much as their personal future (i.e., retrospective bias). This is in contrast to research showing a prospective bias in thinking behavior, based on self-report and experience-sampling methods. Findings are discussed in relation to the social functions of recalling the personal past (e.g., sharing memories to bond with others, to update each other, to teach, to give advice) and to the directive functions of future-oriented thought (e.g., planning, decision making, goal setting that are more likely to happen privately in the mind). In sum, the retrospective bias in conversational time travel seems to be a functional and universal phenomenon across persons and across real-life situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6243041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62430412018-11-27 Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations Demiray, Burcu Mehl, Matthias R. Martin, Mike Front Psychol Psychology We examined mental time travel reflected onto individuals’ utterances in real-life conversations using a naturalistic observation method: Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR, a portable audio recorder that periodically and unobtrusively records snippets of ambient sounds and speech). We introduced the term conversational time travel and examined, for the first time, how much individuals talked about their personal past versus personal future in real life. Study 1 included 9,010 sound files collected from 51 American adults who carried the EAR over 1 weekend and were recorded every 9 min for 50 s. Study 2 included 23,103 sound files from 33 young and 48 healthy older adults from Switzerland who carried the EAR for 4 days (2 weekdays and 1 weekend, counterbalanced). 30-s recordings occurred randomly throughout the day. We developed a new coding scheme for conversational time travel: We listened to all sound files and coded each file for whether the participant was talking or not. Those sound files that included participant speech were also coded in terms of their temporal focus (e.g., past, future, present, time-independent) and autobiographical nature (i.e., about the self, about others). We, first, validated our coding scheme using the text analysis tool, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Next, we compared the percentages of past- and future-oriented utterances about the self (to tap onto conversational time travel). Results were consistent across all samples and showed that participants talked about their personal past two to three times as much as their personal future (i.e., retrospective bias). This is in contrast to research showing a prospective bias in thinking behavior, based on self-report and experience-sampling methods. Findings are discussed in relation to the social functions of recalling the personal past (e.g., sharing memories to bond with others, to update each other, to teach, to give advice) and to the directive functions of future-oriented thought (e.g., planning, decision making, goal setting that are more likely to happen privately in the mind). In sum, the retrospective bias in conversational time travel seems to be a functional and universal phenomenon across persons and across real-life situations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6243041/ /pubmed/30483183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02160 Text en Copyright © 2018 Demiray, Mehl and Martin. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Demiray, Burcu
Mehl, Matthias R.
Martin, Mike
Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations
title Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations
title_full Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations
title_fullStr Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations
title_full_unstemmed Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations
title_short Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations
title_sort conversational time travel: evidence of a retrospective bias in real life conversations
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02160
work_keys_str_mv AT demirayburcu conversationaltimetravelevidenceofaretrospectivebiasinreallifeconversations
AT mehlmatthiasr conversationaltimetravelevidenceofaretrospectivebiasinreallifeconversations
AT martinmike conversationaltimetravelevidenceofaretrospectivebiasinreallifeconversations