Cargando…

Evaluation of Proton Therapy Accuracy Using a PMMA Phantom and PET Prediction Module

Purpose: Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning is a widely used method of proton therapy verification. In this study, a proton radiotherapy accuracy verification process was developed by comparing predicted and measured PET data to verify the correctness of PET prediction and was tested at the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Junyu, Lu, Yan, Hsi, Wenchien, Zhang, Jiangang, Sheng, Yinxiangzi, Shi, Leijun, Wang, Weiwei, Lu, Jiade, Zhou, Rong, Cheng, Jingyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483477
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00523
_version_ 1783371901331046400
author Zhang, Junyu
Lu, Yan
Hsi, Wenchien
Zhang, Jiangang
Sheng, Yinxiangzi
Shi, Leijun
Wang, Weiwei
Lu, Jiade
Zhou, Rong
Cheng, Jingyi
author_facet Zhang, Junyu
Lu, Yan
Hsi, Wenchien
Zhang, Jiangang
Sheng, Yinxiangzi
Shi, Leijun
Wang, Weiwei
Lu, Jiade
Zhou, Rong
Cheng, Jingyi
author_sort Zhang, Junyu
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning is a widely used method of proton therapy verification. In this study, a proton radiotherapy accuracy verification process was developed by comparing predicted and measured PET data to verify the correctness of PET prediction and was tested at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center. Method: Irradiation was performed on a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom. There were two dose groups, to which 2 and 4 Gy doses were delivered, and each dose group had different designed dose depths ranging from 5 to 20 cm. The predicted PET results were obtained using a PET prediction calculation module. The measured data were collected with a PET/computed tomography device. The predicted and measured PET data were normalized to similar PET amplitude values before comparison and were compared using depth and lateral profiles for the position error. The error was evaluated at the position corresponding to 50% of the maximum on the PET curves. The mean and standard deviation were calculated based on the data sampled in the scoring area. Gamma index analysis is also applied in the comparison. Results: In the depth comparison, the 2 and 4 Gy dose cases yielded similar mean depth errors between 1 and −1 mm, and the deviation was <2 mm. In the lateral comparison, the 2 Gy cases had a mean lateral error around 1 mm, and the 4 Gy cases had a mean lateral error <1 mm, with a standard deviation <1 mm for both the 2 and 4 Gy cases. All the cases have a gamma passing rate over 95%. Conclusion: The comparison of these PMMA phantom cases revealed good agreement between the predicted and measured PET data, with depth and lateral position errors <2 mm in total, considering the uncertainty. The comparison results demonstrate that the PET predictions obtained in PMMA phantom tests for single proton beam therapy verification are reliable and that the research can be extended to verification in human body treatment with further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6243057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62430572018-11-27 Evaluation of Proton Therapy Accuracy Using a PMMA Phantom and PET Prediction Module Zhang, Junyu Lu, Yan Hsi, Wenchien Zhang, Jiangang Sheng, Yinxiangzi Shi, Leijun Wang, Weiwei Lu, Jiade Zhou, Rong Cheng, Jingyi Front Oncol Oncology Purpose: Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning is a widely used method of proton therapy verification. In this study, a proton radiotherapy accuracy verification process was developed by comparing predicted and measured PET data to verify the correctness of PET prediction and was tested at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center. Method: Irradiation was performed on a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom. There were two dose groups, to which 2 and 4 Gy doses were delivered, and each dose group had different designed dose depths ranging from 5 to 20 cm. The predicted PET results were obtained using a PET prediction calculation module. The measured data were collected with a PET/computed tomography device. The predicted and measured PET data were normalized to similar PET amplitude values before comparison and were compared using depth and lateral profiles for the position error. The error was evaluated at the position corresponding to 50% of the maximum on the PET curves. The mean and standard deviation were calculated based on the data sampled in the scoring area. Gamma index analysis is also applied in the comparison. Results: In the depth comparison, the 2 and 4 Gy dose cases yielded similar mean depth errors between 1 and −1 mm, and the deviation was <2 mm. In the lateral comparison, the 2 Gy cases had a mean lateral error around 1 mm, and the 4 Gy cases had a mean lateral error <1 mm, with a standard deviation <1 mm for both the 2 and 4 Gy cases. All the cases have a gamma passing rate over 95%. Conclusion: The comparison of these PMMA phantom cases revealed good agreement between the predicted and measured PET data, with depth and lateral position errors <2 mm in total, considering the uncertainty. The comparison results demonstrate that the PET predictions obtained in PMMA phantom tests for single proton beam therapy verification are reliable and that the research can be extended to verification in human body treatment with further investigation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6243057/ /pubmed/30483477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00523 Text en Copyright © 2018 Zhang, Lu, Hsi, Zhang, Sheng, Shi, Wang, Lu, Zhou and Cheng. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Junyu
Lu, Yan
Hsi, Wenchien
Zhang, Jiangang
Sheng, Yinxiangzi
Shi, Leijun
Wang, Weiwei
Lu, Jiade
Zhou, Rong
Cheng, Jingyi
Evaluation of Proton Therapy Accuracy Using a PMMA Phantom and PET Prediction Module
title Evaluation of Proton Therapy Accuracy Using a PMMA Phantom and PET Prediction Module
title_full Evaluation of Proton Therapy Accuracy Using a PMMA Phantom and PET Prediction Module
title_fullStr Evaluation of Proton Therapy Accuracy Using a PMMA Phantom and PET Prediction Module
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Proton Therapy Accuracy Using a PMMA Phantom and PET Prediction Module
title_short Evaluation of Proton Therapy Accuracy Using a PMMA Phantom and PET Prediction Module
title_sort evaluation of proton therapy accuracy using a pmma phantom and pet prediction module
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483477
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00523
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjunyu evaluationofprotontherapyaccuracyusingapmmaphantomandpetpredictionmodule
AT luyan evaluationofprotontherapyaccuracyusingapmmaphantomandpetpredictionmodule
AT hsiwenchien evaluationofprotontherapyaccuracyusingapmmaphantomandpetpredictionmodule
AT zhangjiangang evaluationofprotontherapyaccuracyusingapmmaphantomandpetpredictionmodule
AT shengyinxiangzi evaluationofprotontherapyaccuracyusingapmmaphantomandpetpredictionmodule
AT shileijun evaluationofprotontherapyaccuracyusingapmmaphantomandpetpredictionmodule
AT wangweiwei evaluationofprotontherapyaccuracyusingapmmaphantomandpetpredictionmodule
AT lujiade evaluationofprotontherapyaccuracyusingapmmaphantomandpetpredictionmodule
AT zhourong evaluationofprotontherapyaccuracyusingapmmaphantomandpetpredictionmodule
AT chengjingyi evaluationofprotontherapyaccuracyusingapmmaphantomandpetpredictionmodule