Cargando…

Response of Wheat to a Multiple Species Microbial Inoculant Compared to Fertilizer Application

Microbial inoculants, including those formed from multiple species, may have dual functions as biostimulants and/or biocontrol agents, and claimed agricultural benefits are instrumental for regulatory categorisation. Biostimulants include commercial products containing substances or microorganisms t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assainar, Salmabi K., Abbott, Lynette K., Mickan, Bede S., Whiteley, Andrew S., Siddique, Kadambot H. M., Solaiman, Zakaria M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483282
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01601
_version_ 1783371906054881280
author Assainar, Salmabi K.
Abbott, Lynette K.
Mickan, Bede S.
Whiteley, Andrew S.
Siddique, Kadambot H. M.
Solaiman, Zakaria M.
author_facet Assainar, Salmabi K.
Abbott, Lynette K.
Mickan, Bede S.
Whiteley, Andrew S.
Siddique, Kadambot H. M.
Solaiman, Zakaria M.
author_sort Assainar, Salmabi K.
collection PubMed
description Microbial inoculants, including those formed from multiple species, may have dual functions as biostimulants and/or biocontrol agents, and claimed agricultural benefits are instrumental for regulatory categorisation. Biostimulants include commercial products containing substances or microorganisms that stimulate plant growth. Biostimulant microbes can be involved in a range of processes that affect N and P transformations in soil and thus influence nutrient availability, and N and P fertilizers can influence soil microbial diversity and function. A glasshouse experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of a multiple species microbial inoculant relative to a rock-based mineral fertilizer and a chemical fertilizer on wheat growth and yield, and on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. The microbial inoculant was compared to the mineral fertilizer (equivalent to 5.6 kg N ha(-1) and 5.6 kg P ha(-1)), and to the chemical fertilizer applied at three rates equivalent to: (i) 7.3 kg N ha(-1) and 8.4 kg P ha(-1) as recommended for on-farm use, (ii) 5.6 kg N ha(-1) and 6.5 kg P ha(-1) which matched the N in the mineral fertilizer, and (iii) 4.9 kg N ha(-1) and 5.6 kg P ha(-1) which matched P content in the mineral fertilizer. Despite an early reduction in plant growth, the microbial inoculant treatment increased shoot growth at maturity compared to the control. Similarly, grain yield was higher after application of the microbial inoculant when compared to control, and it was similar to that of plants receiving the fertilizer treatments. Using 16S rRNA sequencing, the microbial inoculant and fertilizer treatments were shown to influence the diversity of rhizosphere bacteria. The microbial inoculant increased the relative abundance of the phylum Actinobacteria. At tillering, the proportion of roots colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi increased with the microbial inoculant and mineral fertilizer treatments, but decreased with the chemical fertilizer treatments. At maturity, there were no treatment effects on the proportion of wheat roots colonized by AM fungi. Overall, the multiple species microbial inoculant had beneficial effects in terms of wheat yield relative to the commercial mineral and chemical fertilizers applied at the level recommended for on-farm use in south-western Australia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6243077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62430772018-11-27 Response of Wheat to a Multiple Species Microbial Inoculant Compared to Fertilizer Application Assainar, Salmabi K. Abbott, Lynette K. Mickan, Bede S. Whiteley, Andrew S. Siddique, Kadambot H. M. Solaiman, Zakaria M. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Microbial inoculants, including those formed from multiple species, may have dual functions as biostimulants and/or biocontrol agents, and claimed agricultural benefits are instrumental for regulatory categorisation. Biostimulants include commercial products containing substances or microorganisms that stimulate plant growth. Biostimulant microbes can be involved in a range of processes that affect N and P transformations in soil and thus influence nutrient availability, and N and P fertilizers can influence soil microbial diversity and function. A glasshouse experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of a multiple species microbial inoculant relative to a rock-based mineral fertilizer and a chemical fertilizer on wheat growth and yield, and on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. The microbial inoculant was compared to the mineral fertilizer (equivalent to 5.6 kg N ha(-1) and 5.6 kg P ha(-1)), and to the chemical fertilizer applied at three rates equivalent to: (i) 7.3 kg N ha(-1) and 8.4 kg P ha(-1) as recommended for on-farm use, (ii) 5.6 kg N ha(-1) and 6.5 kg P ha(-1) which matched the N in the mineral fertilizer, and (iii) 4.9 kg N ha(-1) and 5.6 kg P ha(-1) which matched P content in the mineral fertilizer. Despite an early reduction in plant growth, the microbial inoculant treatment increased shoot growth at maturity compared to the control. Similarly, grain yield was higher after application of the microbial inoculant when compared to control, and it was similar to that of plants receiving the fertilizer treatments. Using 16S rRNA sequencing, the microbial inoculant and fertilizer treatments were shown to influence the diversity of rhizosphere bacteria. The microbial inoculant increased the relative abundance of the phylum Actinobacteria. At tillering, the proportion of roots colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi increased with the microbial inoculant and mineral fertilizer treatments, but decreased with the chemical fertilizer treatments. At maturity, there were no treatment effects on the proportion of wheat roots colonized by AM fungi. Overall, the multiple species microbial inoculant had beneficial effects in terms of wheat yield relative to the commercial mineral and chemical fertilizers applied at the level recommended for on-farm use in south-western Australia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6243077/ /pubmed/30483282 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01601 Text en Copyright © 2018 Assainar, Abbott, Mickan, Whiteley, Siddique and Solaiman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Assainar, Salmabi K.
Abbott, Lynette K.
Mickan, Bede S.
Whiteley, Andrew S.
Siddique, Kadambot H. M.
Solaiman, Zakaria M.
Response of Wheat to a Multiple Species Microbial Inoculant Compared to Fertilizer Application
title Response of Wheat to a Multiple Species Microbial Inoculant Compared to Fertilizer Application
title_full Response of Wheat to a Multiple Species Microbial Inoculant Compared to Fertilizer Application
title_fullStr Response of Wheat to a Multiple Species Microbial Inoculant Compared to Fertilizer Application
title_full_unstemmed Response of Wheat to a Multiple Species Microbial Inoculant Compared to Fertilizer Application
title_short Response of Wheat to a Multiple Species Microbial Inoculant Compared to Fertilizer Application
title_sort response of wheat to a multiple species microbial inoculant compared to fertilizer application
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483282
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01601
work_keys_str_mv AT assainarsalmabik responseofwheattoamultiplespeciesmicrobialinoculantcomparedtofertilizerapplication
AT abbottlynettek responseofwheattoamultiplespeciesmicrobialinoculantcomparedtofertilizerapplication
AT mickanbedes responseofwheattoamultiplespeciesmicrobialinoculantcomparedtofertilizerapplication
AT whiteleyandrews responseofwheattoamultiplespeciesmicrobialinoculantcomparedtofertilizerapplication
AT siddiquekadambothm responseofwheattoamultiplespeciesmicrobialinoculantcomparedtofertilizerapplication
AT solaimanzakariam responseofwheattoamultiplespeciesmicrobialinoculantcomparedtofertilizerapplication