Cargando…
An Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Repair Research Pipeline
BACKGROUND: We conducted a study of recommendations from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guideline, “Optimizing the Management of Rotator Cuff Problems.” Using these recommendations, we conducted searches of clinical trial registries and bibliographic databases to note the extent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30480012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118805731 |
_version_ | 1783371981752631296 |
---|---|
author | Checketts, Jake X. Scott, Jared Gordon, Josh Jones, Jaclyn Horn, Jarryd Farabough, Michelle Whitener, Jake Boose, Marshall Vassar, Matt |
author_facet | Checketts, Jake X. Scott, Jared Gordon, Josh Jones, Jaclyn Horn, Jarryd Farabough, Michelle Whitener, Jake Boose, Marshall Vassar, Matt |
author_sort | Checketts, Jake X. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We conducted a study of recommendations from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guideline, “Optimizing the Management of Rotator Cuff Problems.” Using these recommendations, we conducted searches of clinical trial registries and bibliographic databases to note the extent to which new research has been undertaken to address areas of deficiency. HYPOTHESIS: Newly conducted research regarding rotator cuff repair and injury is available that will fill knowledge gaps identified by the AAOS guideline. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: For each recommendation in the AAOS guideline, we created PICO (participants, intervention, comparator, outcome) questions and search strings. Searches were conducted of ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MEDLINE via PubMed, and EMBASE to locate studies undertaken after the final literature search performed by the AAOS work group. RESULTS: We located 210 newly registered trials and 448 published studies that are relevant to the recommendations made in the rotator cuff guideline. The majority of the recommendations have been addressed by relevant registered trials or published studies. Of the 448 published studies, 185 directly addressed the guideline recommendations. Additionally, 71% of the 185 published studies directly addressing the recommendations were randomized trials or systematic reviews/meta-analyses. The most important finding of our study was that the recommendations in the AAOS rotator cuff guideline have been adequately addressed. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic researchers have adequately addressed knowledge gaps regarding rotator cuff repair treatment and management options. As such, the AAOS may consider a guideline update to ensure that recommendations reflect current findings in orthopaedic literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6243427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62434272018-11-26 An Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Repair Research Pipeline Checketts, Jake X. Scott, Jared Gordon, Josh Jones, Jaclyn Horn, Jarryd Farabough, Michelle Whitener, Jake Boose, Marshall Vassar, Matt Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: We conducted a study of recommendations from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guideline, “Optimizing the Management of Rotator Cuff Problems.” Using these recommendations, we conducted searches of clinical trial registries and bibliographic databases to note the extent to which new research has been undertaken to address areas of deficiency. HYPOTHESIS: Newly conducted research regarding rotator cuff repair and injury is available that will fill knowledge gaps identified by the AAOS guideline. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: For each recommendation in the AAOS guideline, we created PICO (participants, intervention, comparator, outcome) questions and search strings. Searches were conducted of ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MEDLINE via PubMed, and EMBASE to locate studies undertaken after the final literature search performed by the AAOS work group. RESULTS: We located 210 newly registered trials and 448 published studies that are relevant to the recommendations made in the rotator cuff guideline. The majority of the recommendations have been addressed by relevant registered trials or published studies. Of the 448 published studies, 185 directly addressed the guideline recommendations. Additionally, 71% of the 185 published studies directly addressing the recommendations were randomized trials or systematic reviews/meta-analyses. The most important finding of our study was that the recommendations in the AAOS rotator cuff guideline have been adequately addressed. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic researchers have adequately addressed knowledge gaps regarding rotator cuff repair treatment and management options. As such, the AAOS may consider a guideline update to ensure that recommendations reflect current findings in orthopaedic literature. SAGE Publications 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6243427/ /pubmed/30480012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118805731 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Checketts, Jake X. Scott, Jared Gordon, Josh Jones, Jaclyn Horn, Jarryd Farabough, Michelle Whitener, Jake Boose, Marshall Vassar, Matt An Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Repair Research Pipeline |
title | An Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Repair Research Pipeline |
title_full | An Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Repair Research Pipeline |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Repair Research Pipeline |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Repair Research Pipeline |
title_short | An Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Repair Research Pipeline |
title_sort | evaluation of the rotator cuff repair research pipeline |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30480012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118805731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT checkettsjakex anevaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT scottjared anevaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT gordonjosh anevaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT jonesjaclyn anevaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT hornjarryd anevaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT faraboughmichelle anevaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT whitenerjake anevaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT boosemarshall anevaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT vassarmatt anevaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT checkettsjakex evaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT scottjared evaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT gordonjosh evaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT jonesjaclyn evaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT hornjarryd evaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT faraboughmichelle evaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT whitenerjake evaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT boosemarshall evaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline AT vassarmatt evaluationoftherotatorcuffrepairresearchpipeline |