Cargando…

Objective Quantification of Liposuction Results

Currently, no reliable gold standard exists for the objective outcome measurement following liposuction. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize reported methods of monitoring liposuction results by objectively measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue. A systematic literature search was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azzi, Alain J., Lafrenière, Ann-Sophie, Viezel-Mathieu, Alex, Hemmerling, Thomas M., Gilardino, Mirko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533983
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_102_18
_version_ 1783371999100272640
author Azzi, Alain J.
Lafrenière, Ann-Sophie
Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
Hemmerling, Thomas M.
Gilardino, Mirko
author_facet Azzi, Alain J.
Lafrenière, Ann-Sophie
Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
Hemmerling, Thomas M.
Gilardino, Mirko
author_sort Azzi, Alain J.
collection PubMed
description Currently, no reliable gold standard exists for the objective outcome measurement following liposuction. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize reported methods of monitoring liposuction results by objectively measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue. A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant articles that described techniques for objectively quantifying adipose tissue following traditional liposuction. The search included published articles in three electronic databases—Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed. Subcutaneous adipose tissue was estimated using the following techniques: ultrasound, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and three-dimensional imaging volumetric analysis. Reported benefits of liposuction objective measurements included providing patients with a quantitative assessment of the liposuction results pre- and postoperatively, detecting significant changes in body fat deposits, and following patterns of fat redistribution. This review provides a summary of various techniques for quantification of liposuction results. More studies are needed to study the clinical relevancy and impact of the various imaging modalities reviewed as well as to develop automated volumetric measurement technology with improved accuracy, efficacy, and reproducibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6243817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62438172018-12-10 Objective Quantification of Liposuction Results Azzi, Alain J. Lafrenière, Ann-Sophie Viezel-Mathieu, Alex Hemmerling, Thomas M. Gilardino, Mirko J Cutan Aesthet Surg Review Article Currently, no reliable gold standard exists for the objective outcome measurement following liposuction. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize reported methods of monitoring liposuction results by objectively measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue. A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant articles that described techniques for objectively quantifying adipose tissue following traditional liposuction. The search included published articles in three electronic databases—Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed. Subcutaneous adipose tissue was estimated using the following techniques: ultrasound, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and three-dimensional imaging volumetric analysis. Reported benefits of liposuction objective measurements included providing patients with a quantitative assessment of the liposuction results pre- and postoperatively, detecting significant changes in body fat deposits, and following patterns of fat redistribution. This review provides a summary of various techniques for quantification of liposuction results. More studies are needed to study the clinical relevancy and impact of the various imaging modalities reviewed as well as to develop automated volumetric measurement technology with improved accuracy, efficacy, and reproducibility. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6243817/ /pubmed/30533983 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_102_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Azzi, Alain J.
Lafrenière, Ann-Sophie
Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
Hemmerling, Thomas M.
Gilardino, Mirko
Objective Quantification of Liposuction Results
title Objective Quantification of Liposuction Results
title_full Objective Quantification of Liposuction Results
title_fullStr Objective Quantification of Liposuction Results
title_full_unstemmed Objective Quantification of Liposuction Results
title_short Objective Quantification of Liposuction Results
title_sort objective quantification of liposuction results
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6243817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533983
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_102_18
work_keys_str_mv AT azzialainj objectivequantificationofliposuctionresults
AT lafreniereannsophie objectivequantificationofliposuctionresults
AT viezelmathieualex objectivequantificationofliposuctionresults
AT hemmerlingthomasm objectivequantificationofliposuctionresults
AT gilardinomirko objectivequantificationofliposuctionresults