Cargando…
Development of a Donor Tissue Holding Technique for Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using a 25-Gauge Graft Manipulator
PURPOSE: To report a modified surgical technique called the “donor tissue holding technique for Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)” using a newly developed 25-gauge graft manipulator. METHODS: Six consecutive patients exhibiting endothelial dysfunction were enrolled and treated...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000493571 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: To report a modified surgical technique called the “donor tissue holding technique for Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)” using a newly developed 25-gauge graft manipulator. METHODS: Six consecutive patients exhibiting endothelial dysfunction were enrolled and treated by DMEK. In brief, after insertion of a DMEK donor into the anterior chamber, the edge of the roll was grasped using a graft manipulator and this grasp was maintained throughout the centering and opening of the roll (holding technique). The following parameters were evaluated in comparison to the previous 10 consecutive DMEK cases in which the no touch technique was used: time of graft unfolding, incidence of intra-/postoperative complications, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and endothelial cell density (ECD) 6 months after the procedure. RESULTS: In both technique groups, neither intra- nor postoperative complications were noted in any case. No differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative BCVA (p = 0.88). Also, no differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative ECD (holding technique group: 2,108.3 cells/mm(2), no touch technique group: 1,491.7 cells/mm(2)) (p = 0.08) Most notably, the time of graft unfolding prior to filling with air was significantly reduced in the holding technique group (305.5 s) compared to that of the no touch technique group (1,310.0 s; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This donor tissue holding technique enabled rapid and safe DMEK in a reproducible manner, even in Asian eyes with shallow anterior chambers with high vitreous pressure. |
---|