Cargando…
Charged particle single nanometre manufacturing
Following a brief historical summary of the way in which electron beam lithography developed out of the scanning electron microscope, three state-of-the-art charged-particle beam nanopatterning technologies are considered. All three have been the subject of a recently completed European Union Projec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Beilstein-Institut
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30498657 http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.266 |
_version_ | 1783372051089719296 |
---|---|
author | Prewett, Philip D Hagen, Cornelis W Lenk, Claudia Lenk, Steve Kaestner, Marcus Ivanov, Tzvetan Ahmad, Ahmad Rangelow, Ivo W Shi, Xiaoqing Boden, Stuart A Robinson, Alex P G Yang, Dongxu Hari, Sangeetha Scotuzzi, Marijke Huq, Ejaz |
author_facet | Prewett, Philip D Hagen, Cornelis W Lenk, Claudia Lenk, Steve Kaestner, Marcus Ivanov, Tzvetan Ahmad, Ahmad Rangelow, Ivo W Shi, Xiaoqing Boden, Stuart A Robinson, Alex P G Yang, Dongxu Hari, Sangeetha Scotuzzi, Marijke Huq, Ejaz |
author_sort | Prewett, Philip D |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a brief historical summary of the way in which electron beam lithography developed out of the scanning electron microscope, three state-of-the-art charged-particle beam nanopatterning technologies are considered. All three have been the subject of a recently completed European Union Project entitled “Single Nanometre Manufacturing: Beyond CMOS”. Scanning helium ion beam lithography has the advantages of virtually zero proximity effect, nanoscale patterning capability and high sensitivity in combination with a novel fullerene resist based on the sub-nanometre C(60) molecule. The shot noise-limited minimum linewidth achieved to date is 6 nm. The second technology, focused electron induced processing (FEBIP), uses a nozzle-dispensed precursor gas either to etch or to deposit patterns on the nanometre scale without the need for resist. The process has potential for high throughput enhancement using multiple electron beams and a system employing up to 196 beams is under development based on a commercial SEM platform. Among its potential applications is the manufacture of templates for nanoimprint lithography, NIL. This is also a target application for the third and final charged particle technology, viz. field emission electron scanning probe lithography, FE-eSPL. This has been developed out of scanning tunneling microscopy using lower-energy electrons (tens of electronvolts rather than the tens of kiloelectronvolts of the other techniques). It has the considerable advantage of being employed without the need for a vacuum system, in ambient air and is capable of sub-10 nm patterning using either developable resists or a self-developing mode applicable for many polymeric resists, which is preferred. Like FEBIP it is potentially capable of massive parallelization for applications requiring high throughput. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6244241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Beilstein-Institut |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62442412018-11-29 Charged particle single nanometre manufacturing Prewett, Philip D Hagen, Cornelis W Lenk, Claudia Lenk, Steve Kaestner, Marcus Ivanov, Tzvetan Ahmad, Ahmad Rangelow, Ivo W Shi, Xiaoqing Boden, Stuart A Robinson, Alex P G Yang, Dongxu Hari, Sangeetha Scotuzzi, Marijke Huq, Ejaz Beilstein J Nanotechnol Review Following a brief historical summary of the way in which electron beam lithography developed out of the scanning electron microscope, three state-of-the-art charged-particle beam nanopatterning technologies are considered. All three have been the subject of a recently completed European Union Project entitled “Single Nanometre Manufacturing: Beyond CMOS”. Scanning helium ion beam lithography has the advantages of virtually zero proximity effect, nanoscale patterning capability and high sensitivity in combination with a novel fullerene resist based on the sub-nanometre C(60) molecule. The shot noise-limited minimum linewidth achieved to date is 6 nm. The second technology, focused electron induced processing (FEBIP), uses a nozzle-dispensed precursor gas either to etch or to deposit patterns on the nanometre scale without the need for resist. The process has potential for high throughput enhancement using multiple electron beams and a system employing up to 196 beams is under development based on a commercial SEM platform. Among its potential applications is the manufacture of templates for nanoimprint lithography, NIL. This is also a target application for the third and final charged particle technology, viz. field emission electron scanning probe lithography, FE-eSPL. This has been developed out of scanning tunneling microscopy using lower-energy electrons (tens of electronvolts rather than the tens of kiloelectronvolts of the other techniques). It has the considerable advantage of being employed without the need for a vacuum system, in ambient air and is capable of sub-10 nm patterning using either developable resists or a self-developing mode applicable for many polymeric resists, which is preferred. Like FEBIP it is potentially capable of massive parallelization for applications requiring high throughput. Beilstein-Institut 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6244241/ /pubmed/30498657 http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.266 Text en Copyright © 2018, Prewett et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano/termsThis is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited. The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano/terms) |
spellingShingle | Review Prewett, Philip D Hagen, Cornelis W Lenk, Claudia Lenk, Steve Kaestner, Marcus Ivanov, Tzvetan Ahmad, Ahmad Rangelow, Ivo W Shi, Xiaoqing Boden, Stuart A Robinson, Alex P G Yang, Dongxu Hari, Sangeetha Scotuzzi, Marijke Huq, Ejaz Charged particle single nanometre manufacturing |
title | Charged particle single nanometre manufacturing |
title_full | Charged particle single nanometre manufacturing |
title_fullStr | Charged particle single nanometre manufacturing |
title_full_unstemmed | Charged particle single nanometre manufacturing |
title_short | Charged particle single nanometre manufacturing |
title_sort | charged particle single nanometre manufacturing |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30498657 http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.266 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prewettphilipd chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT hagencornelisw chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT lenkclaudia chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT lenksteve chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT kaestnermarcus chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT ivanovtzvetan chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT ahmadahmad chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT rangelowivow chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT shixiaoqing chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT bodenstuarta chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT robinsonalexpg chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT yangdongxu chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT harisangeetha chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT scotuzzimarijke chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing AT huqejaz chargedparticlesinglenanometremanufacturing |