Cargando…

An Updated Systematic Review of Childhood Physical Activity Questionnaires

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This review is an update of a previous review published in 2010, and aims to summarize the available studies on the measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires for young people under the age of 18 years. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were carried ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hidding, Lisan M., Chinapaw, Mai. J. M., van Poppel, Mireille N. M., Mokkink, Lidwine B., Altenburg, Teatske M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30298479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0987-0
_version_ 1783372081328553984
author Hidding, Lisan M.
Chinapaw, Mai. J. M.
van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
Mokkink, Lidwine B.
Altenburg, Teatske M.
author_facet Hidding, Lisan M.
Chinapaw, Mai. J. M.
van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
Mokkink, Lidwine B.
Altenburg, Teatske M.
author_sort Hidding, Lisan M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This review is an update of a previous review published in 2010, and aims to summarize the available studies on the measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires for young people under the age of 18 years. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were carried out using the online PubMed, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus databases up to 2018. Articles had to evaluate at least one of the measurement properties of a questionnaire measuring at least the duration or frequency of children’s physical activity, and be published in the English language. The standardized COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used for the quality assessment of the studies. RESULTS: This review yielded 87 articles on 89 different questionnaires. Within the 87 articles, 162 studies were conducted: 103 studies assessed construct validity, 50 assessed test–retest reliability, and nine assessed measurement error. Of these studies, 38% were of poor methodological quality and 49% of fair methodological quality. A questionnaire with acceptable validity was found only for adolescents, i.e., the Greek version of the 3-Day Physical Activity Record. Questionnaires with acceptable test–retest reliability were found in all age categories, i.e., preschoolers, children, and adolescents. CONCLUSION: Unfortunately, no questionnaires were identified with conclusive evidence for both acceptable validity and reliability, partly due to the low methodological quality of the studies. This evidence is urgently needed, as current research and practice are using physical activity questionnaires of unknown validity and reliability. Therefore, recommendations for high-quality studies on measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires were formulated in the discussion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016038695. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-018-0987-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6244567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62445672018-12-04 An Updated Systematic Review of Childhood Physical Activity Questionnaires Hidding, Lisan M. Chinapaw, Mai. J. M. van Poppel, Mireille N. M. Mokkink, Lidwine B. Altenburg, Teatske M. Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This review is an update of a previous review published in 2010, and aims to summarize the available studies on the measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires for young people under the age of 18 years. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were carried out using the online PubMed, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus databases up to 2018. Articles had to evaluate at least one of the measurement properties of a questionnaire measuring at least the duration or frequency of children’s physical activity, and be published in the English language. The standardized COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used for the quality assessment of the studies. RESULTS: This review yielded 87 articles on 89 different questionnaires. Within the 87 articles, 162 studies were conducted: 103 studies assessed construct validity, 50 assessed test–retest reliability, and nine assessed measurement error. Of these studies, 38% were of poor methodological quality and 49% of fair methodological quality. A questionnaire with acceptable validity was found only for adolescents, i.e., the Greek version of the 3-Day Physical Activity Record. Questionnaires with acceptable test–retest reliability were found in all age categories, i.e., preschoolers, children, and adolescents. CONCLUSION: Unfortunately, no questionnaires were identified with conclusive evidence for both acceptable validity and reliability, partly due to the low methodological quality of the studies. This evidence is urgently needed, as current research and practice are using physical activity questionnaires of unknown validity and reliability. Therefore, recommendations for high-quality studies on measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires were formulated in the discussion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016038695. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-018-0987-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-10-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6244567/ /pubmed/30298479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0987-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Hidding, Lisan M.
Chinapaw, Mai. J. M.
van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
Mokkink, Lidwine B.
Altenburg, Teatske M.
An Updated Systematic Review of Childhood Physical Activity Questionnaires
title An Updated Systematic Review of Childhood Physical Activity Questionnaires
title_full An Updated Systematic Review of Childhood Physical Activity Questionnaires
title_fullStr An Updated Systematic Review of Childhood Physical Activity Questionnaires
title_full_unstemmed An Updated Systematic Review of Childhood Physical Activity Questionnaires
title_short An Updated Systematic Review of Childhood Physical Activity Questionnaires
title_sort updated systematic review of childhood physical activity questionnaires
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30298479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0987-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hiddinglisanm anupdatedsystematicreviewofchildhoodphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT chinapawmaijm anupdatedsystematicreviewofchildhoodphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT vanpoppelmireillenm anupdatedsystematicreviewofchildhoodphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT mokkinklidwineb anupdatedsystematicreviewofchildhoodphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT altenburgteatskem anupdatedsystematicreviewofchildhoodphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT hiddinglisanm updatedsystematicreviewofchildhoodphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT chinapawmaijm updatedsystematicreviewofchildhoodphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT vanpoppelmireillenm updatedsystematicreviewofchildhoodphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT mokkinklidwineb updatedsystematicreviewofchildhoodphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT altenburgteatskem updatedsystematicreviewofchildhoodphysicalactivityquestionnaires